Automatically extracting sentences from medline citations to support clinicians' information needs

Siddhartha Reddy Jonnalagadda, Guilherme Del Fiol, Richard Medlin, Charlene Weir, Marcelo Fiszman, Javed Mostafa, Hongfang D Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Online health knowledge resources contain answers to most of the information needs raised by clinicians in the course of care. However, significant barriers limit the use of these resources for decisionmaking, especially clinicians' lack of time. In this study we assessed the feasibility of automatically generating knowledge summaries for a particular clinical topic composed of relevant sentences extracted from Medline citations. Methods: The proposed approach combines information retrieval and semantic information extraction techniques to identify relevant sentences from Medline abstracts. We assessed this approach in two case studies on the treatment alternatives for depression and Alzheimer's disease. Results: A total of 515 of 564 (91.3%) sentences retrieved in the two case studies were relevant to the topic of interest. About one-third of the relevant sentences described factual knowledge or a study conclusion that can be used for supporting information needs at the point of care. Conclusions: The high rate of relevant sentences is desirable, given that clinicians' lack of time is one of the main barriers to using knowledge resources at the point of care. Sentence rank was not significantly associated with relevancy, possibly due to most sentences being highly relevant. Sentences located closer to the end of the abstract and sentences with treatment and comparative predications were likely to be conclusive sentences. Our proposed technical approach to helping clinicians meet their information needs is promising. The approach can be extended for other knowledge resources and information need types.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)995-1000
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Point-of-Care Systems
Information Storage and Retrieval
Health Resources
Feasibility Studies
Semantics
Alzheimer Disease
Depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Automatically extracting sentences from medline citations to support clinicians' information needs. / Jonnalagadda, Siddhartha Reddy; Del Fiol, Guilherme; Medlin, Richard; Weir, Charlene; Fiszman, Marcelo; Mostafa, Javed; Liu, Hongfang D.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2013, p. 995-1000.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jonnalagadda, Siddhartha Reddy ; Del Fiol, Guilherme ; Medlin, Richard ; Weir, Charlene ; Fiszman, Marcelo ; Mostafa, Javed ; Liu, Hongfang D. / Automatically extracting sentences from medline citations to support clinicians' information needs. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2013 ; Vol. 20, No. 5. pp. 995-1000.
@article{de21d8c8e5fe431f8ee5c32920d5570a,
title = "Automatically extracting sentences from medline citations to support clinicians' information needs",
abstract = "Objective: Online health knowledge resources contain answers to most of the information needs raised by clinicians in the course of care. However, significant barriers limit the use of these resources for decisionmaking, especially clinicians' lack of time. In this study we assessed the feasibility of automatically generating knowledge summaries for a particular clinical topic composed of relevant sentences extracted from Medline citations. Methods: The proposed approach combines information retrieval and semantic information extraction techniques to identify relevant sentences from Medline abstracts. We assessed this approach in two case studies on the treatment alternatives for depression and Alzheimer's disease. Results: A total of 515 of 564 (91.3{\%}) sentences retrieved in the two case studies were relevant to the topic of interest. About one-third of the relevant sentences described factual knowledge or a study conclusion that can be used for supporting information needs at the point of care. Conclusions: The high rate of relevant sentences is desirable, given that clinicians' lack of time is one of the main barriers to using knowledge resources at the point of care. Sentence rank was not significantly associated with relevancy, possibly due to most sentences being highly relevant. Sentences located closer to the end of the abstract and sentences with treatment and comparative predications were likely to be conclusive sentences. Our proposed technical approach to helping clinicians meet their information needs is promising. The approach can be extended for other knowledge resources and information need types.",
author = "Jonnalagadda, {Siddhartha Reddy} and {Del Fiol}, Guilherme and Richard Medlin and Charlene Weir and Marcelo Fiszman and Javed Mostafa and Liu, {Hongfang D}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001347",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "995--1000",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automatically extracting sentences from medline citations to support clinicians' information needs

AU - Jonnalagadda, Siddhartha Reddy

AU - Del Fiol, Guilherme

AU - Medlin, Richard

AU - Weir, Charlene

AU - Fiszman, Marcelo

AU - Mostafa, Javed

AU - Liu, Hongfang D

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Objective: Online health knowledge resources contain answers to most of the information needs raised by clinicians in the course of care. However, significant barriers limit the use of these resources for decisionmaking, especially clinicians' lack of time. In this study we assessed the feasibility of automatically generating knowledge summaries for a particular clinical topic composed of relevant sentences extracted from Medline citations. Methods: The proposed approach combines information retrieval and semantic information extraction techniques to identify relevant sentences from Medline abstracts. We assessed this approach in two case studies on the treatment alternatives for depression and Alzheimer's disease. Results: A total of 515 of 564 (91.3%) sentences retrieved in the two case studies were relevant to the topic of interest. About one-third of the relevant sentences described factual knowledge or a study conclusion that can be used for supporting information needs at the point of care. Conclusions: The high rate of relevant sentences is desirable, given that clinicians' lack of time is one of the main barriers to using knowledge resources at the point of care. Sentence rank was not significantly associated with relevancy, possibly due to most sentences being highly relevant. Sentences located closer to the end of the abstract and sentences with treatment and comparative predications were likely to be conclusive sentences. Our proposed technical approach to helping clinicians meet their information needs is promising. The approach can be extended for other knowledge resources and information need types.

AB - Objective: Online health knowledge resources contain answers to most of the information needs raised by clinicians in the course of care. However, significant barriers limit the use of these resources for decisionmaking, especially clinicians' lack of time. In this study we assessed the feasibility of automatically generating knowledge summaries for a particular clinical topic composed of relevant sentences extracted from Medline citations. Methods: The proposed approach combines information retrieval and semantic information extraction techniques to identify relevant sentences from Medline abstracts. We assessed this approach in two case studies on the treatment alternatives for depression and Alzheimer's disease. Results: A total of 515 of 564 (91.3%) sentences retrieved in the two case studies were relevant to the topic of interest. About one-third of the relevant sentences described factual knowledge or a study conclusion that can be used for supporting information needs at the point of care. Conclusions: The high rate of relevant sentences is desirable, given that clinicians' lack of time is one of the main barriers to using knowledge resources at the point of care. Sentence rank was not significantly associated with relevancy, possibly due to most sentences being highly relevant. Sentences located closer to the end of the abstract and sentences with treatment and comparative predications were likely to be conclusive sentences. Our proposed technical approach to helping clinicians meet their information needs is promising. The approach can be extended for other knowledge resources and information need types.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882770655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882770655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001347

DO - 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001347

M3 - Article

C2 - 23100128

AN - SCOPUS:84882770655

VL - 20

SP - 995

EP - 1000

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 5

ER -