Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: Time to rethink our therapeutic options?

Saul F. Morales-Valero, Giuseppe Lanzino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is a well-recognized risk factor for ischemic stroke, and its prevalence increases with age. In the late 1980s and in the 1990s, well-designed randomized trials established a definite advantage for carotid endarterectomy in reducing the risk of ipsilateral stroke when compared with medical therapy alone. However, medical treatment of cardiovascular disease has improved significantly over the past 2 decades, and this has, in turn, resulted in a decline of the stroke risk in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis treated medically. This improvement in medical therapy casts doubts on the effectiveness of large-scale invasive treatment in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Several studies have been conducted to identify possible subgroups of patients with asymptomatic stenosis who are at higher risk of stroke in order to maximize the potential benefits of invasive treatment. Ongoing large-scale trials comparing best current medical therapy to available invasive treatments, such as carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting, are likely to shed some light on this debated topic in the near future. In this review, the authors summarize the current controversy surrounding the ideal management of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberE2
JournalNeurosurgical focus
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Keywords

  • Carotid artery stenosis
  • Carotid endarterectomy
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: Time to rethink our therapeutic options?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this