Association of Vital Signs and Process Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients

Nicole R. Hodgson, Karl A. Poterack, Lanyu Mi, Stephen Traub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: We sought to determine the association of abnormal vital signs with emergency department (ED) process outcomes in both discharged and admitted patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of five years of operational data at a single site. We identified all visits for patients 18 and older who were discharged home without ancillary services, and separately identified all visits for patients admitted to a floor (ward) bed. We assessed two process outcomes for discharged visits (returns to the ED within 72 hours and returns to the ED within 72 hours resulting in admission) and two process outcomes for admitted patients (transfer to a higher level of care [intermediate care or intensive care] within either six hours or 24 hours of arrival to floor). Last-recorded ED vital signs were obtained for all patients. We report rates of abnormal vital signs in each group, as well as the relative risk of meeting a process outcome for each individual vital sign abnormality. Results: Patients with tachycardia, tachypnea, or fever more commonly experienced all measured process outcomes compared to patients without these abnormal vitals; admitted hypotensive patients more frequently required transfer to a higher level of care within 24 hours. Conclusion: In a single facility, patients with abnormal last-recorded ED vital signs experienced more undesirable process outcomes than patients with normal vitals. Vital sign abnormalities may serve as a useful signal in outcome forecasting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)433-437
Number of pages5
JournalThe western journal of emergency medicine
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Vital Signs
Hospital Emergency Service
Tachypnea
Patient Transfer
Critical Care
Tachycardia
Fever

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Association of Vital Signs and Process Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients. / Hodgson, Nicole R.; Poterack, Karl A.; Mi, Lanyu; Traub, Stephen.

In: The western journal of emergency medicine, Vol. 20, No. 3, 01.05.2019, p. 433-437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hodgson, Nicole R. ; Poterack, Karl A. ; Mi, Lanyu ; Traub, Stephen. / Association of Vital Signs and Process Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients. In: The western journal of emergency medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 433-437.
@article{4fa5549e54e2414f8fc661b105442025,
title = "Association of Vital Signs and Process Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients",
abstract = "Introduction: We sought to determine the association of abnormal vital signs with emergency department (ED) process outcomes in both discharged and admitted patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of five years of operational data at a single site. We identified all visits for patients 18 and older who were discharged home without ancillary services, and separately identified all visits for patients admitted to a floor (ward) bed. We assessed two process outcomes for discharged visits (returns to the ED within 72 hours and returns to the ED within 72 hours resulting in admission) and two process outcomes for admitted patients (transfer to a higher level of care [intermediate care or intensive care] within either six hours or 24 hours of arrival to floor). Last-recorded ED vital signs were obtained for all patients. We report rates of abnormal vital signs in each group, as well as the relative risk of meeting a process outcome for each individual vital sign abnormality. Results: Patients with tachycardia, tachypnea, or fever more commonly experienced all measured process outcomes compared to patients without these abnormal vitals; admitted hypotensive patients more frequently required transfer to a higher level of care within 24 hours. Conclusion: In a single facility, patients with abnormal last-recorded ED vital signs experienced more undesirable process outcomes than patients with normal vitals. Vital sign abnormalities may serve as a useful signal in outcome forecasting.",
author = "Hodgson, {Nicole R.} and Poterack, {Karl A.} and Lanyu Mi and Stephen Traub",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5811/westjem.2019.1.41498",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "433--437",
journal = "Western Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1936-900X",
publisher = "University of California",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of Vital Signs and Process Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients

AU - Hodgson, Nicole R.

AU - Poterack, Karl A.

AU - Mi, Lanyu

AU - Traub, Stephen

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Introduction: We sought to determine the association of abnormal vital signs with emergency department (ED) process outcomes in both discharged and admitted patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of five years of operational data at a single site. We identified all visits for patients 18 and older who were discharged home without ancillary services, and separately identified all visits for patients admitted to a floor (ward) bed. We assessed two process outcomes for discharged visits (returns to the ED within 72 hours and returns to the ED within 72 hours resulting in admission) and two process outcomes for admitted patients (transfer to a higher level of care [intermediate care or intensive care] within either six hours or 24 hours of arrival to floor). Last-recorded ED vital signs were obtained for all patients. We report rates of abnormal vital signs in each group, as well as the relative risk of meeting a process outcome for each individual vital sign abnormality. Results: Patients with tachycardia, tachypnea, or fever more commonly experienced all measured process outcomes compared to patients without these abnormal vitals; admitted hypotensive patients more frequently required transfer to a higher level of care within 24 hours. Conclusion: In a single facility, patients with abnormal last-recorded ED vital signs experienced more undesirable process outcomes than patients with normal vitals. Vital sign abnormalities may serve as a useful signal in outcome forecasting.

AB - Introduction: We sought to determine the association of abnormal vital signs with emergency department (ED) process outcomes in both discharged and admitted patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of five years of operational data at a single site. We identified all visits for patients 18 and older who were discharged home without ancillary services, and separately identified all visits for patients admitted to a floor (ward) bed. We assessed two process outcomes for discharged visits (returns to the ED within 72 hours and returns to the ED within 72 hours resulting in admission) and two process outcomes for admitted patients (transfer to a higher level of care [intermediate care or intensive care] within either six hours or 24 hours of arrival to floor). Last-recorded ED vital signs were obtained for all patients. We report rates of abnormal vital signs in each group, as well as the relative risk of meeting a process outcome for each individual vital sign abnormality. Results: Patients with tachycardia, tachypnea, or fever more commonly experienced all measured process outcomes compared to patients without these abnormal vitals; admitted hypotensive patients more frequently required transfer to a higher level of care within 24 hours. Conclusion: In a single facility, patients with abnormal last-recorded ED vital signs experienced more undesirable process outcomes than patients with normal vitals. Vital sign abnormalities may serve as a useful signal in outcome forecasting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066858714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066858714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5811/westjem.2019.1.41498

DO - 10.5811/westjem.2019.1.41498

M3 - Article

C2 - 31123542

AN - SCOPUS:85066858714

VL - 20

SP - 433

EP - 437

JO - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 1936-900X

IS - 3

ER -