Association of negative fluid balance during the de-escalation phase of sepsis management with mortality: A cohort study

Tsering Dhondup, Jong Chie Claudia Tien, Alberto Marquez, Cassie C. Kennedy, Ognjen Gajic, Kianoush B. Kashani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the impact of negative fluid balance during the fluid de-escalation phase of sepsis management. Material and methods: This is a historical cohort study of adult intensive care units (ICU) patients with septic shock and severe sepsis in a quaternary medical center, from January 2007 through December 2009. We used regression modeling to assess the impact of negative volume balance on mortality after adjustments for age, comorbidities, and illness severity. Results: Among 633 enrolled patients, 387 patients reached negative fluid balance who in comparison with others had a lower 90-day mortality rate (36% vs. 44%; P = .048), despite higher severity of illness. Each 1-L negative daily fluid balance was associated with reduced ICU, hospital, 90-day and 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39 [95%CI, 0.28–0.57], 0.76 [95%CI, 0.63–0.94], 0.69 [95%CI, 0.59–0.81], 0.67 [0.58–0.78], respectively; P < .05). This protective effect of negative volume balance was maintained when cumulative ICU fluid balance was utilized. Conclusions: There is not only a significant association between outcomes of patients who were resuscitated for sepsis and achieving negative fluid balance, but also the amount of daily or cumulative negative fluid balance is associated with lower mortality of these patients. Prospective clinical trials are needed to validate this finding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-21
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume55
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2020

Fingerprint

Water-Electrolyte Balance
Sepsis
Cohort Studies
Mortality
Intensive Care Units
Septic Shock
Comorbidity
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • De-escalation
  • Fluid balance
  • Mortality
  • Resuscitation
  • Severe sepsis
  • Shock, septic
  • Water-electrolyte balance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Association of negative fluid balance during the de-escalation phase of sepsis management with mortality : A cohort study. / Dhondup, Tsering; Tien, Jong Chie Claudia; Marquez, Alberto; Kennedy, Cassie C.; Gajic, Ognjen; Kashani, Kianoush B.

In: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 55, 02.2020, p. 16-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64a196a1809e4c69adbadd61c4cec77d,
title = "Association of negative fluid balance during the de-escalation phase of sepsis management with mortality: A cohort study",
abstract = "Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the impact of negative fluid balance during the fluid de-escalation phase of sepsis management. Material and methods: This is a historical cohort study of adult intensive care units (ICU) patients with septic shock and severe sepsis in a quaternary medical center, from January 2007 through December 2009. We used regression modeling to assess the impact of negative volume balance on mortality after adjustments for age, comorbidities, and illness severity. Results: Among 633 enrolled patients, 387 patients reached negative fluid balance who in comparison with others had a lower 90-day mortality rate (36{\%} vs. 44{\%}; P = .048), despite higher severity of illness. Each 1-L negative daily fluid balance was associated with reduced ICU, hospital, 90-day and 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39 [95{\%}CI, 0.28–0.57], 0.76 [95{\%}CI, 0.63–0.94], 0.69 [95{\%}CI, 0.59–0.81], 0.67 [0.58–0.78], respectively; P < .05). This protective effect of negative volume balance was maintained when cumulative ICU fluid balance was utilized. Conclusions: There is not only a significant association between outcomes of patients who were resuscitated for sepsis and achieving negative fluid balance, but also the amount of daily or cumulative negative fluid balance is associated with lower mortality of these patients. Prospective clinical trials are needed to validate this finding.",
keywords = "De-escalation, Fluid balance, Mortality, Resuscitation, Severe sepsis, Shock, septic, Water-electrolyte balance",
author = "Tsering Dhondup and Tien, {Jong Chie Claudia} and Alberto Marquez and Kennedy, {Cassie C.} and Ognjen Gajic and Kashani, {Kianoush B.}",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.09.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "16--21",
journal = "Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "0883-9441",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of negative fluid balance during the de-escalation phase of sepsis management with mortality

T2 - A cohort study

AU - Dhondup, Tsering

AU - Tien, Jong Chie Claudia

AU - Marquez, Alberto

AU - Kennedy, Cassie C.

AU - Gajic, Ognjen

AU - Kashani, Kianoush B.

PY - 2020/2

Y1 - 2020/2

N2 - Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the impact of negative fluid balance during the fluid de-escalation phase of sepsis management. Material and methods: This is a historical cohort study of adult intensive care units (ICU) patients with septic shock and severe sepsis in a quaternary medical center, from January 2007 through December 2009. We used regression modeling to assess the impact of negative volume balance on mortality after adjustments for age, comorbidities, and illness severity. Results: Among 633 enrolled patients, 387 patients reached negative fluid balance who in comparison with others had a lower 90-day mortality rate (36% vs. 44%; P = .048), despite higher severity of illness. Each 1-L negative daily fluid balance was associated with reduced ICU, hospital, 90-day and 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39 [95%CI, 0.28–0.57], 0.76 [95%CI, 0.63–0.94], 0.69 [95%CI, 0.59–0.81], 0.67 [0.58–0.78], respectively; P < .05). This protective effect of negative volume balance was maintained when cumulative ICU fluid balance was utilized. Conclusions: There is not only a significant association between outcomes of patients who were resuscitated for sepsis and achieving negative fluid balance, but also the amount of daily or cumulative negative fluid balance is associated with lower mortality of these patients. Prospective clinical trials are needed to validate this finding.

AB - Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the impact of negative fluid balance during the fluid de-escalation phase of sepsis management. Material and methods: This is a historical cohort study of adult intensive care units (ICU) patients with septic shock and severe sepsis in a quaternary medical center, from January 2007 through December 2009. We used regression modeling to assess the impact of negative volume balance on mortality after adjustments for age, comorbidities, and illness severity. Results: Among 633 enrolled patients, 387 patients reached negative fluid balance who in comparison with others had a lower 90-day mortality rate (36% vs. 44%; P = .048), despite higher severity of illness. Each 1-L negative daily fluid balance was associated with reduced ICU, hospital, 90-day and 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39 [95%CI, 0.28–0.57], 0.76 [95%CI, 0.63–0.94], 0.69 [95%CI, 0.59–0.81], 0.67 [0.58–0.78], respectively; P < .05). This protective effect of negative volume balance was maintained when cumulative ICU fluid balance was utilized. Conclusions: There is not only a significant association between outcomes of patients who were resuscitated for sepsis and achieving negative fluid balance, but also the amount of daily or cumulative negative fluid balance is associated with lower mortality of these patients. Prospective clinical trials are needed to validate this finding.

KW - De-escalation

KW - Fluid balance

KW - Mortality

KW - Resuscitation

KW - Severe sepsis

KW - Shock, septic

KW - Water-electrolyte balance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073989610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073989610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.09.025

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.09.025

M3 - Article

C2 - 31670149

AN - SCOPUS:85073989610

VL - 55

SP - 16

EP - 21

JO - Journal of Critical Care

JF - Journal of Critical Care

SN - 0883-9441

ER -