TY - JOUR
T1 - Association Between Generic-to-Generic Levothyroxine Switching and Thyrotropin Levels Among US Adults
AU - Brito, Juan P.
AU - Deng, Yihong
AU - Ross, Joseph S.
AU - Choi, Nam Hee
AU - Graham, David J.
AU - Qiang, Yandong
AU - Rantou, Elena
AU - Wang, Zhong
AU - Zhao, Liang
AU - Shah, Nilay D.
AU - Lipska, Kasia J.
N1 - Funding Information:
receiving research support through Yale University from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Medical Devices Innovation Consortium, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), and the Laura and John Arnold Foundation; he reported serving as an expert witness at the request of a relator’s attorneys at the Greene Law Firm in a qui tam suit alleging violations of the False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Statute against Biogen Inc. Dr Shah reported receiving grants from the FDA and research support through the Mayo Clinic from CMS, AHRQ, NIH NHLBI, National Science Foundation, and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Dr Lipska reported receiving grants from the National Institute on Aging and PCORI and receiving suppport from CMS to develop and evaluate publicly reported quality measures. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding Information:
Funding/Support: This project was supported by grant U01FD005938 from the FDA of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of a financial assistance award (Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation grant to Yale University and Mayo Clinic) totaling $158 430, with 100% funded by the FDA and HHS.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Medical Association. All rights reserved
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - IMPORTANCE Switching among generic levothyroxine sodium products made by different manufacturers typically occurs at the pharmacy and may affect serum thyrotropin (TSH) levels. OBJECTIVE To compare TSH levels between patients who continued taking the same sourced generic levothyroxine product and those who switched. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This comparative effectiveness research study with 1:1 propensity matching used data from OptumLabs Data Warehouse, a national administrative claims database linked to laboratory test results. Adults aged 18 years or older were included if they filled a generic levothyroxine prescription between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2019, and had a stable drug dose, the same drug manufacturer, and a normal TSH level (0.3-4.4 mIU/L) for at least 3 months before either continuing to take the same product or switching among generic levothyroxine products (index date). Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, had diagnosed hypopituitarism or hyperthyroidism, or had a medical condition or used medications that could affect thyrotropin levels. They were also excluded if they filled a prescription for other forms of thyroid replacement therapy between 6 months before the index date and when the first TSH level was obtained 6 weeks to 12 months after the index date. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2019, to November 24, 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Proportion of individuals with a normal (0.3-4.4 mIU/L) or markedly abnormal (<0.1 or >10.0 mIU/L) TSH level using the first available laboratory result 6 weeks to 12 months after the index date. A propensity score model was developed to minimize confounding using logistic regression with the binary outcome of continuing the same sourced levothyroxine product vs switching generic levothyroxine. Covariates were demographics, comorbidities, and baseline TSH level. The balance among the treatment groups was evaluated by comparing standardized mean differences of baseline covariates between the groups. RESULTS A total of 15 829 patients filled generic levothyroxine (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [14.6] years; 73.4% [11 624] were women; 4.5% [705] were Asian, 10.2% [1617] were Black, 11.4% [1801] were Hispanic, and 71.4% [11 295] were White individuals); of these patients, 56.3% [8905] received a daily levothyroxine dose of 50 μg or less. A total of 13 049 patients (82.4%) continued taking the same sourced preparation, and 2780 (17.6%) switched among generic levothyroxine preparations. Among 2780 propensity-matched patient pairs, the proportion of patients with a normal TSH level after the index date was 82.7% (2298) among nonswitchers and 84.5% (2348) among switchers (risk difference, −0.018; 95% CI, −0.038 to 0.002; P =.07). The proportion of patients with a markedly abnormal TSH level after the index date was 3.1% (87) among nonswitchers and 2.5% (69) among switchers (risk difference, 0.007; 95% CI, −0.002 to 0.015; P =.14). The mean (SD) TSH levels after the index date were 2.7 (2.3) mIU/L among nonswitchers and 2.7 (3.3) mIU/L among switchers (P =.94). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this comparative effectiveness research study suggest that switching among different generic levothyroxine products was not associated with clinically significant changes in TSH level. These findings conflict with the current guideline recommendation that warns clinicians about potential changes in TSH level associated with switching among levothyroxine products sourced from different manufacturers.
AB - IMPORTANCE Switching among generic levothyroxine sodium products made by different manufacturers typically occurs at the pharmacy and may affect serum thyrotropin (TSH) levels. OBJECTIVE To compare TSH levels between patients who continued taking the same sourced generic levothyroxine product and those who switched. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This comparative effectiveness research study with 1:1 propensity matching used data from OptumLabs Data Warehouse, a national administrative claims database linked to laboratory test results. Adults aged 18 years or older were included if they filled a generic levothyroxine prescription between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2019, and had a stable drug dose, the same drug manufacturer, and a normal TSH level (0.3-4.4 mIU/L) for at least 3 months before either continuing to take the same product or switching among generic levothyroxine products (index date). Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, had diagnosed hypopituitarism or hyperthyroidism, or had a medical condition or used medications that could affect thyrotropin levels. They were also excluded if they filled a prescription for other forms of thyroid replacement therapy between 6 months before the index date and when the first TSH level was obtained 6 weeks to 12 months after the index date. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2019, to November 24, 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Proportion of individuals with a normal (0.3-4.4 mIU/L) or markedly abnormal (<0.1 or >10.0 mIU/L) TSH level using the first available laboratory result 6 weeks to 12 months after the index date. A propensity score model was developed to minimize confounding using logistic regression with the binary outcome of continuing the same sourced levothyroxine product vs switching generic levothyroxine. Covariates were demographics, comorbidities, and baseline TSH level. The balance among the treatment groups was evaluated by comparing standardized mean differences of baseline covariates between the groups. RESULTS A total of 15 829 patients filled generic levothyroxine (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [14.6] years; 73.4% [11 624] were women; 4.5% [705] were Asian, 10.2% [1617] were Black, 11.4% [1801] were Hispanic, and 71.4% [11 295] were White individuals); of these patients, 56.3% [8905] received a daily levothyroxine dose of 50 μg or less. A total of 13 049 patients (82.4%) continued taking the same sourced preparation, and 2780 (17.6%) switched among generic levothyroxine preparations. Among 2780 propensity-matched patient pairs, the proportion of patients with a normal TSH level after the index date was 82.7% (2298) among nonswitchers and 84.5% (2348) among switchers (risk difference, −0.018; 95% CI, −0.038 to 0.002; P =.07). The proportion of patients with a markedly abnormal TSH level after the index date was 3.1% (87) among nonswitchers and 2.5% (69) among switchers (risk difference, 0.007; 95% CI, −0.002 to 0.015; P =.14). The mean (SD) TSH levels after the index date were 2.7 (2.3) mIU/L among nonswitchers and 2.7 (3.3) mIU/L among switchers (P =.94). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this comparative effectiveness research study suggest that switching among different generic levothyroxine products was not associated with clinically significant changes in TSH level. These findings conflict with the current guideline recommendation that warns clinicians about potential changes in TSH level associated with switching among levothyroxine products sourced from different manufacturers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125717135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125717135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0045
DO - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0045
M3 - Article
C2 - 35226058
AN - SCOPUS:85125717135
VL - 182
SP - 418
EP - 425
JO - Archives of internal medicine (Chicago, Ill. : 1908)
JF - Archives of internal medicine (Chicago, Ill. : 1908)
SN - 2168-6106
IS - 4
ER -