Assessment of the diagnostic performance and interobserver variability of endocytoscopy in Barrett's esophagus: A pilot ex-vivo study

Yutaka Tomizawa, Prasad G Iyer, Louis M. Wongkeesong, Navtej Singh Buttar, Lori S. Lutzke, Tsung Teh Wu, Kenneth Ke Ning Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIM: To investigate a classification of endocytoscopy (ECS) images in Barrett's esophagus (BE) and evaluate its diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. METHODS: ECS was applied to surveillance endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) specimens of BE ex-vivo. The mucosal surface of specimen was stained with 1% methylene blue and surveyed with a catheter-type endocytoscope. We selected still images that were most representative of the endoscopically suspect lesion and matched with the final histopathological diagnosis to accomplish accurate correlation. The diagnostic performance and inter-observer variability of the new classification scheme were assessed in a blinded fashion by physicians with expertise in both BE and ECS and inexperienced physicians with no prior exposure to ECS. RESULTS: Three staff physicians and 22 gastroenterology fellows classified eight randomly assigned unknown still ECS pictures (two images per each classification) into one of four histopathologic categories as follows: (1) BEC1-squamous epithelium; (2) BEC2-BE without dysplasia; (3) BEC3-BE with dysplasia; and (4) BEC4-esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in BE. Accuracy of diagnosis in staff physicians and clinical fellows were, respectively, 100% and 99.4% for BEC1, 95.8% and 83.0% for BEC2, 91.7% and 83.0% for BEC3, and 95.8% and 98.3% for BEC4. Interobserver agreement of the faculty physicians and fellows in classifying each category were 0.932 and 0.897, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to investigate classification system of ECS in BE. This ex-vivo pilot study demonstrated acceptable diagnostic accuracy and excellent interobserver agreement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8652-8658
Number of pages7
JournalWorld Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume19
Issue number46
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 14 2013

Fingerprint

Barrett Esophagus
Observer Variation
Physicians
Methylene Blue
Gastroenterology
Adenocarcinoma
Catheters
Epithelium

Keywords

  • Barrett's esophagus
  • Dysplasia
  • Endocytoscopy
  • Esophageal adenocarcinoma
  • Interobserver agreement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Assessment of the diagnostic performance and interobserver variability of endocytoscopy in Barrett's esophagus : A pilot ex-vivo study. / Tomizawa, Yutaka; Iyer, Prasad G; Wongkeesong, Louis M.; Buttar, Navtej Singh; Lutzke, Lori S.; Wu, Tsung Teh; Wang, Kenneth Ke Ning.

In: World Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 19, No. 46, 14.12.2013, p. 8652-8658.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7b862a7a692e4182ae9bf6ddecad62f4,
title = "Assessment of the diagnostic performance and interobserver variability of endocytoscopy in Barrett's esophagus: A pilot ex-vivo study",
abstract = "AIM: To investigate a classification of endocytoscopy (ECS) images in Barrett's esophagus (BE) and evaluate its diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. METHODS: ECS was applied to surveillance endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) specimens of BE ex-vivo. The mucosal surface of specimen was stained with 1{\%} methylene blue and surveyed with a catheter-type endocytoscope. We selected still images that were most representative of the endoscopically suspect lesion and matched with the final histopathological diagnosis to accomplish accurate correlation. The diagnostic performance and inter-observer variability of the new classification scheme were assessed in a blinded fashion by physicians with expertise in both BE and ECS and inexperienced physicians with no prior exposure to ECS. RESULTS: Three staff physicians and 22 gastroenterology fellows classified eight randomly assigned unknown still ECS pictures (two images per each classification) into one of four histopathologic categories as follows: (1) BEC1-squamous epithelium; (2) BEC2-BE without dysplasia; (3) BEC3-BE with dysplasia; and (4) BEC4-esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in BE. Accuracy of diagnosis in staff physicians and clinical fellows were, respectively, 100{\%} and 99.4{\%} for BEC1, 95.8{\%} and 83.0{\%} for BEC2, 91.7{\%} and 83.0{\%} for BEC3, and 95.8{\%} and 98.3{\%} for BEC4. Interobserver agreement of the faculty physicians and fellows in classifying each category were 0.932 and 0.897, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to investigate classification system of ECS in BE. This ex-vivo pilot study demonstrated acceptable diagnostic accuracy and excellent interobserver agreement.",
keywords = "Barrett's esophagus, Dysplasia, Endocytoscopy, Esophageal adenocarcinoma, Interobserver agreement",
author = "Yutaka Tomizawa and Iyer, {Prasad G} and Wongkeesong, {Louis M.} and Buttar, {Navtej Singh} and Lutzke, {Lori S.} and Wu, {Tsung Teh} and Wang, {Kenneth Ke Ning}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "14",
doi = "10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8652",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "8652--8658",
journal = "World Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "1007-9327",
publisher = "WJG Press",
number = "46",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of the diagnostic performance and interobserver variability of endocytoscopy in Barrett's esophagus

T2 - A pilot ex-vivo study

AU - Tomizawa, Yutaka

AU - Iyer, Prasad G

AU - Wongkeesong, Louis M.

AU - Buttar, Navtej Singh

AU - Lutzke, Lori S.

AU - Wu, Tsung Teh

AU - Wang, Kenneth Ke Ning

PY - 2013/12/14

Y1 - 2013/12/14

N2 - AIM: To investigate a classification of endocytoscopy (ECS) images in Barrett's esophagus (BE) and evaluate its diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. METHODS: ECS was applied to surveillance endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) specimens of BE ex-vivo. The mucosal surface of specimen was stained with 1% methylene blue and surveyed with a catheter-type endocytoscope. We selected still images that were most representative of the endoscopically suspect lesion and matched with the final histopathological diagnosis to accomplish accurate correlation. The diagnostic performance and inter-observer variability of the new classification scheme were assessed in a blinded fashion by physicians with expertise in both BE and ECS and inexperienced physicians with no prior exposure to ECS. RESULTS: Three staff physicians and 22 gastroenterology fellows classified eight randomly assigned unknown still ECS pictures (two images per each classification) into one of four histopathologic categories as follows: (1) BEC1-squamous epithelium; (2) BEC2-BE without dysplasia; (3) BEC3-BE with dysplasia; and (4) BEC4-esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in BE. Accuracy of diagnosis in staff physicians and clinical fellows were, respectively, 100% and 99.4% for BEC1, 95.8% and 83.0% for BEC2, 91.7% and 83.0% for BEC3, and 95.8% and 98.3% for BEC4. Interobserver agreement of the faculty physicians and fellows in classifying each category were 0.932 and 0.897, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to investigate classification system of ECS in BE. This ex-vivo pilot study demonstrated acceptable diagnostic accuracy and excellent interobserver agreement.

AB - AIM: To investigate a classification of endocytoscopy (ECS) images in Barrett's esophagus (BE) and evaluate its diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. METHODS: ECS was applied to surveillance endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) specimens of BE ex-vivo. The mucosal surface of specimen was stained with 1% methylene blue and surveyed with a catheter-type endocytoscope. We selected still images that were most representative of the endoscopically suspect lesion and matched with the final histopathological diagnosis to accomplish accurate correlation. The diagnostic performance and inter-observer variability of the new classification scheme were assessed in a blinded fashion by physicians with expertise in both BE and ECS and inexperienced physicians with no prior exposure to ECS. RESULTS: Three staff physicians and 22 gastroenterology fellows classified eight randomly assigned unknown still ECS pictures (two images per each classification) into one of four histopathologic categories as follows: (1) BEC1-squamous epithelium; (2) BEC2-BE without dysplasia; (3) BEC3-BE with dysplasia; and (4) BEC4-esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in BE. Accuracy of diagnosis in staff physicians and clinical fellows were, respectively, 100% and 99.4% for BEC1, 95.8% and 83.0% for BEC2, 91.7% and 83.0% for BEC3, and 95.8% and 98.3% for BEC4. Interobserver agreement of the faculty physicians and fellows in classifying each category were 0.932 and 0.897, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to investigate classification system of ECS in BE. This ex-vivo pilot study demonstrated acceptable diagnostic accuracy and excellent interobserver agreement.

KW - Barrett's esophagus

KW - Dysplasia

KW - Endocytoscopy

KW - Esophageal adenocarcinoma

KW - Interobserver agreement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890354276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890354276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8652

DO - 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8652

M3 - Article

C2 - 24379583

AN - SCOPUS:84890354276

VL - 19

SP - 8652

EP - 8658

JO - World Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - World Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 1007-9327

IS - 46

ER -