TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the needs of Black/African American dementia caregivers seeking emotional support
AU - Fields, Julie A.
AU - Forsberg, Leah K.
AU - Knutson, Matthew
AU - Seifert, Sara J.
AU - Farah-Milller, Emily A.
AU - Melius, Jodi L.
AU - Miller, Joel K.
AU - Knopman, David S.
AU - Boeve, Bradley F.
AU - Petersen, Ronald C.
AU - Kramer, Kevin M.
AU - Lunde, Angela M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 the Alzheimer's Association.
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Black/African Americans (B/AA) are nearly twice as likely as White/European Americans (W/EA) to have Alzheimer's or other dementias and are more likely to provide care for persons with dementia (PwD). Evidence indicates that B/AA desire having someone to talk with who understands their caregiving challenges, yet are less likely than W/EA to ask for support. Further, community resources supporting caregivers' ability to maintain health and well-being developed with input from B/AA are lacking. We aimed to determine how a technology-assisted caregiver matching service designed with user input could address diverse caregiver needs. METHODS: For this Phase I project, 32 caregivers of PwD (31% B/AA) participated in semi-structured focus groups and completed surveys to provide input regarding characteristics deemed valuable in someone they would choose to be connected with for emotional support. Through an iterative process as new information emerged, a web-based prototype and matching algorithm were developed. RESULTS: Age and sex distribution were similar between B/AA and W/EA (71 and 68 yrs; 90% and 86%, respectively). W/EA were most likely caring for a spouse/significant other (73%) whereas B/AA were caring for spouse/significant other (30%), a parent (30%;18% W/EA), a sibling (10%; 0% W/EA), or other (30%; 9%W/EA). Level of emotional support was rated "poor" (50% B/AA, 18% W/EA); "average" (0% B/AA, 14% W/EA); "good" (40% B/AA, 41% W/EA); and "excellent" (10%, 27% W/EA). Characteristics B/AA deemed "very important" or "absolutely essential" for a supportive match included living in close proximity, same ethnicity, similar lifestyle, and common values. Alternatively, W/EA selected similar age, living in close proximity, same sex, similar lifestyle, common values and interests, having the same caregiving relationship, and having the same diagnosis in their PwD (see chart). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, B/AA reported poorer levels of emotional support than W/EA. B/AA were equally likely to be supporting a spouse/significant other as a parent or other acquaintance, whereas W/EA provided support primarily for a spouse/significant other. Characteristics B/AA and W/EA consider important in a supportive caregiver match show important differences that should be considered when optimizing caregiving resources. Phase II will explore further in a much larger sample.
AB - BACKGROUND: Black/African Americans (B/AA) are nearly twice as likely as White/European Americans (W/EA) to have Alzheimer's or other dementias and are more likely to provide care for persons with dementia (PwD). Evidence indicates that B/AA desire having someone to talk with who understands their caregiving challenges, yet are less likely than W/EA to ask for support. Further, community resources supporting caregivers' ability to maintain health and well-being developed with input from B/AA are lacking. We aimed to determine how a technology-assisted caregiver matching service designed with user input could address diverse caregiver needs. METHODS: For this Phase I project, 32 caregivers of PwD (31% B/AA) participated in semi-structured focus groups and completed surveys to provide input regarding characteristics deemed valuable in someone they would choose to be connected with for emotional support. Through an iterative process as new information emerged, a web-based prototype and matching algorithm were developed. RESULTS: Age and sex distribution were similar between B/AA and W/EA (71 and 68 yrs; 90% and 86%, respectively). W/EA were most likely caring for a spouse/significant other (73%) whereas B/AA were caring for spouse/significant other (30%), a parent (30%;18% W/EA), a sibling (10%; 0% W/EA), or other (30%; 9%W/EA). Level of emotional support was rated "poor" (50% B/AA, 18% W/EA); "average" (0% B/AA, 14% W/EA); "good" (40% B/AA, 41% W/EA); and "excellent" (10%, 27% W/EA). Characteristics B/AA deemed "very important" or "absolutely essential" for a supportive match included living in close proximity, same ethnicity, similar lifestyle, and common values. Alternatively, W/EA selected similar age, living in close proximity, same sex, similar lifestyle, common values and interests, having the same caregiving relationship, and having the same diagnosis in their PwD (see chart). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, B/AA reported poorer levels of emotional support than W/EA. B/AA were equally likely to be supporting a spouse/significant other as a parent or other acquaintance, whereas W/EA provided support primarily for a spouse/significant other. Characteristics B/AA and W/EA consider important in a supportive caregiver match show important differences that should be considered when optimizing caregiving resources. Phase II will explore further in a much larger sample.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123036531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123036531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/alz.056579
DO - 10.1002/alz.056579
M3 - Article
C2 - 34971251
AN - SCOPUS:85123036531
SN - 1552-5260
VL - 17
SP - e056579
JO - Alzheimer's and Dementia
JF - Alzheimer's and Dementia
ER -