Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences

Cara J. Alexander, Weronika M. Crescini, Justin E. Juskewitch, Nirusha Lachman, Wojciech Pawlina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The goals of our study were to determine the predictive value and usability of an audience response system (ARS) as a knowledge assessment tool in an undergraduate medical curriculum. Over a three year period (2006-2008), data were collected from first year didactic blocks in Genetics/Histology and Anatomy/Radiology (n = 42-50 per class). During each block, students answered clinically oriented multiple choice questions using the ARS. Students' performances were recorded and cumulative ARS scores were compared with final examination performances. Correlation coefficients between these variables were calculated to assess the existence and direction of an association between ARS and final examination score. If associations existed, univariate models were then constructed using ARS as a predictor of final examination score. Student and faculty perception of ARS difficulty, usefulness, effect on performance, and preferred use were evaluated using a questionnaire. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between ARS and final examination scores in all didactic blocks and predictive univariate models were constructed for each relationship (all P < 0.0001). Students and faculty agreed that ARS was easy to use and a reliable tool for providing real-time feedback that improved their performance and participation. In conclusion, we found ARS to be an effective assessment tool benefiting the faculty and the students in a curriculum focused on interaction and self-directed learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)160-166
Number of pages7
JournalAnatomical Sciences Education
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Teaching
Students
Technology
Curriculum
Radiology
Anatomy
Histology
Learning

Keywords

  • Audience response system (ARS)
  • Formative feedback
  • Gross anatomy
  • Histology
  • Innovations
  • Interactive learning
  • Medical curriculum
  • Medical students
  • Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Histology
  • Embryology

Cite this

Alexander, C. J., Crescini, W. M., Juskewitch, J. E., Lachman, N., & Pawlina, W. (2009). Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences. Anatomical Sciences Education, 2(4), 160-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.99

Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences. / Alexander, Cara J.; Crescini, Weronika M.; Juskewitch, Justin E.; Lachman, Nirusha; Pawlina, Wojciech.

In: Anatomical Sciences Education, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2009, p. 160-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alexander, CJ, Crescini, WM, Juskewitch, JE, Lachman, N & Pawlina, W 2009, 'Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences', Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 160-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.99
Alexander, Cara J. ; Crescini, Weronika M. ; Juskewitch, Justin E. ; Lachman, Nirusha ; Pawlina, Wojciech. / Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences. In: Anatomical Sciences Education. 2009 ; Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 160-166.
@article{8e7775ea9b2b41e087b670591ca8d14d,
title = "Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences",
abstract = "The goals of our study were to determine the predictive value and usability of an audience response system (ARS) as a knowledge assessment tool in an undergraduate medical curriculum. Over a three year period (2006-2008), data were collected from first year didactic blocks in Genetics/Histology and Anatomy/Radiology (n = 42-50 per class). During each block, students answered clinically oriented multiple choice questions using the ARS. Students' performances were recorded and cumulative ARS scores were compared with final examination performances. Correlation coefficients between these variables were calculated to assess the existence and direction of an association between ARS and final examination score. If associations existed, univariate models were then constructed using ARS as a predictor of final examination score. Student and faculty perception of ARS difficulty, usefulness, effect on performance, and preferred use were evaluated using a questionnaire. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between ARS and final examination scores in all didactic blocks and predictive univariate models were constructed for each relationship (all P < 0.0001). Students and faculty agreed that ARS was easy to use and a reliable tool for providing real-time feedback that improved their performance and participation. In conclusion, we found ARS to be an effective assessment tool benefiting the faculty and the students in a curriculum focused on interaction and self-directed learning.",
keywords = "Audience response system (ARS), Formative feedback, Gross anatomy, Histology, Innovations, Interactive learning, Medical curriculum, Medical students, Technology",
author = "Alexander, {Cara J.} and Crescini, {Weronika M.} and Juskewitch, {Justin E.} and Nirusha Lachman and Wojciech Pawlina",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1002/ase.99",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "160--166",
journal = "Anatomical Sciences Education",
issn = "1935-9772",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences

AU - Alexander, Cara J.

AU - Crescini, Weronika M.

AU - Juskewitch, Justin E.

AU - Lachman, Nirusha

AU - Pawlina, Wojciech

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The goals of our study were to determine the predictive value and usability of an audience response system (ARS) as a knowledge assessment tool in an undergraduate medical curriculum. Over a three year period (2006-2008), data were collected from first year didactic blocks in Genetics/Histology and Anatomy/Radiology (n = 42-50 per class). During each block, students answered clinically oriented multiple choice questions using the ARS. Students' performances were recorded and cumulative ARS scores were compared with final examination performances. Correlation coefficients between these variables were calculated to assess the existence and direction of an association between ARS and final examination score. If associations existed, univariate models were then constructed using ARS as a predictor of final examination score. Student and faculty perception of ARS difficulty, usefulness, effect on performance, and preferred use were evaluated using a questionnaire. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between ARS and final examination scores in all didactic blocks and predictive univariate models were constructed for each relationship (all P < 0.0001). Students and faculty agreed that ARS was easy to use and a reliable tool for providing real-time feedback that improved their performance and participation. In conclusion, we found ARS to be an effective assessment tool benefiting the faculty and the students in a curriculum focused on interaction and self-directed learning.

AB - The goals of our study were to determine the predictive value and usability of an audience response system (ARS) as a knowledge assessment tool in an undergraduate medical curriculum. Over a three year period (2006-2008), data were collected from first year didactic blocks in Genetics/Histology and Anatomy/Radiology (n = 42-50 per class). During each block, students answered clinically oriented multiple choice questions using the ARS. Students' performances were recorded and cumulative ARS scores were compared with final examination performances. Correlation coefficients between these variables were calculated to assess the existence and direction of an association between ARS and final examination score. If associations existed, univariate models were then constructed using ARS as a predictor of final examination score. Student and faculty perception of ARS difficulty, usefulness, effect on performance, and preferred use were evaluated using a questionnaire. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between ARS and final examination scores in all didactic blocks and predictive univariate models were constructed for each relationship (all P < 0.0001). Students and faculty agreed that ARS was easy to use and a reliable tool for providing real-time feedback that improved their performance and participation. In conclusion, we found ARS to be an effective assessment tool benefiting the faculty and the students in a curriculum focused on interaction and self-directed learning.

KW - Audience response system (ARS)

KW - Formative feedback

KW - Gross anatomy

KW - Histology

KW - Innovations

KW - Interactive learning

KW - Medical curriculum

KW - Medical students

KW - Technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350489123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350489123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ase.99

DO - 10.1002/ase.99

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 160

EP - 166

JO - Anatomical Sciences Education

JF - Anatomical Sciences Education

SN - 1935-9772

IS - 4

ER -