Assessing Statistical Competencies in Clinical and Translational Science Education: One Size Does Not Fit All

Robert A. Oster, Christopher J. Lindsell, Leah J. Welty, Madhu Mazumdar, Sally W. Thurston, Mohammad H. Rahbar, Rickey E. Carter, Bradley H. Pollock, Andrew J. Cucchiara, Elizabeth J. Kopras, Borko D. Jovanovic, Felicity T Enders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Statistics is an essential training component for a career in clinical and translational science (CTS). Given the increasing complexity of statistics, learners may have difficulty selecting appropriate courses. Our question was: what depth of statistical knowledge do different CTS learners require? Methods: For three types of CTS learners (principal investigator, co-investigator, informed reader of the literature), each with different backgrounds in research (no previous research experience, reader of the research literature, previous research experience), 18 experts in biostatistics, epidemiology, and research design proposed levels for 21 statistical competencies. Results: Statistical competencies were categorized as fundamental, intermediate, or specialized. CTS learners who intend to become independent principal investigators require more specialized training, while those intending to become informed consumers of the medical literature require more fundamental education. For most competencies, less training was proposed for those with more research background. Discussion: When selecting statistical coursework, the learner's research background and career goal should guide the decision. Some statistical competencies are considered to be more important than others. Baseline knowledge assessments may help learners identify appropriate coursework. Conclusion: Rather than one size fits all, tailoring education to baseline knowledge, learner background, and future goals increases learning potential while minimizing classroom time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)32-42
Number of pages11
JournalClinical and Translational Science
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Clinical Competence
Education
Research
Research Personnel
Biostatistics
Statistics
Epidemiology
Research Design
Learning

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Research training
  • Statistical competency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

Assessing Statistical Competencies in Clinical and Translational Science Education : One Size Does Not Fit All. / Oster, Robert A.; Lindsell, Christopher J.; Welty, Leah J.; Mazumdar, Madhu; Thurston, Sally W.; Rahbar, Mohammad H.; Carter, Rickey E.; Pollock, Bradley H.; Cucchiara, Andrew J.; Kopras, Elizabeth J.; Jovanovic, Borko D.; Enders, Felicity T.

In: Clinical and Translational Science, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.02.2015, p. 32-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oster, RA, Lindsell, CJ, Welty, LJ, Mazumdar, M, Thurston, SW, Rahbar, MH, Carter, RE, Pollock, BH, Cucchiara, AJ, Kopras, EJ, Jovanovic, BD & Enders, FT 2015, 'Assessing Statistical Competencies in Clinical and Translational Science Education: One Size Does Not Fit All', Clinical and Translational Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12204
Oster, Robert A. ; Lindsell, Christopher J. ; Welty, Leah J. ; Mazumdar, Madhu ; Thurston, Sally W. ; Rahbar, Mohammad H. ; Carter, Rickey E. ; Pollock, Bradley H. ; Cucchiara, Andrew J. ; Kopras, Elizabeth J. ; Jovanovic, Borko D. ; Enders, Felicity T. / Assessing Statistical Competencies in Clinical and Translational Science Education : One Size Does Not Fit All. In: Clinical and Translational Science. 2015 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 32-42.
@article{aa69f76fae4f4a40954d2b20d4ecfe88,
title = "Assessing Statistical Competencies in Clinical and Translational Science Education: One Size Does Not Fit All",
abstract = "Introduction: Statistics is an essential training component for a career in clinical and translational science (CTS). Given the increasing complexity of statistics, learners may have difficulty selecting appropriate courses. Our question was: what depth of statistical knowledge do different CTS learners require? Methods: For three types of CTS learners (principal investigator, co-investigator, informed reader of the literature), each with different backgrounds in research (no previous research experience, reader of the research literature, previous research experience), 18 experts in biostatistics, epidemiology, and research design proposed levels for 21 statistical competencies. Results: Statistical competencies were categorized as fundamental, intermediate, or specialized. CTS learners who intend to become independent principal investigators require more specialized training, while those intending to become informed consumers of the medical literature require more fundamental education. For most competencies, less training was proposed for those with more research background. Discussion: When selecting statistical coursework, the learner's research background and career goal should guide the decision. Some statistical competencies are considered to be more important than others. Baseline knowledge assessments may help learners identify appropriate coursework. Conclusion: Rather than one size fits all, tailoring education to baseline knowledge, learner background, and future goals increases learning potential while minimizing classroom time.",
keywords = "Assessment, Research training, Statistical competency",
author = "Oster, {Robert A.} and Lindsell, {Christopher J.} and Welty, {Leah J.} and Madhu Mazumdar and Thurston, {Sally W.} and Rahbar, {Mohammad H.} and Carter, {Rickey E.} and Pollock, {Bradley H.} and Cucchiara, {Andrew J.} and Kopras, {Elizabeth J.} and Jovanovic, {Borko D.} and Enders, {Felicity T}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cts.12204",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "32--42",
journal = "Clinical and Translational Science",
issn = "1752-8054",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing Statistical Competencies in Clinical and Translational Science Education

T2 - One Size Does Not Fit All

AU - Oster, Robert A.

AU - Lindsell, Christopher J.

AU - Welty, Leah J.

AU - Mazumdar, Madhu

AU - Thurston, Sally W.

AU - Rahbar, Mohammad H.

AU - Carter, Rickey E.

AU - Pollock, Bradley H.

AU - Cucchiara, Andrew J.

AU - Kopras, Elizabeth J.

AU - Jovanovic, Borko D.

AU - Enders, Felicity T

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Introduction: Statistics is an essential training component for a career in clinical and translational science (CTS). Given the increasing complexity of statistics, learners may have difficulty selecting appropriate courses. Our question was: what depth of statistical knowledge do different CTS learners require? Methods: For three types of CTS learners (principal investigator, co-investigator, informed reader of the literature), each with different backgrounds in research (no previous research experience, reader of the research literature, previous research experience), 18 experts in biostatistics, epidemiology, and research design proposed levels for 21 statistical competencies. Results: Statistical competencies were categorized as fundamental, intermediate, or specialized. CTS learners who intend to become independent principal investigators require more specialized training, while those intending to become informed consumers of the medical literature require more fundamental education. For most competencies, less training was proposed for those with more research background. Discussion: When selecting statistical coursework, the learner's research background and career goal should guide the decision. Some statistical competencies are considered to be more important than others. Baseline knowledge assessments may help learners identify appropriate coursework. Conclusion: Rather than one size fits all, tailoring education to baseline knowledge, learner background, and future goals increases learning potential while minimizing classroom time.

AB - Introduction: Statistics is an essential training component for a career in clinical and translational science (CTS). Given the increasing complexity of statistics, learners may have difficulty selecting appropriate courses. Our question was: what depth of statistical knowledge do different CTS learners require? Methods: For three types of CTS learners (principal investigator, co-investigator, informed reader of the literature), each with different backgrounds in research (no previous research experience, reader of the research literature, previous research experience), 18 experts in biostatistics, epidemiology, and research design proposed levels for 21 statistical competencies. Results: Statistical competencies were categorized as fundamental, intermediate, or specialized. CTS learners who intend to become independent principal investigators require more specialized training, while those intending to become informed consumers of the medical literature require more fundamental education. For most competencies, less training was proposed for those with more research background. Discussion: When selecting statistical coursework, the learner's research background and career goal should guide the decision. Some statistical competencies are considered to be more important than others. Baseline knowledge assessments may help learners identify appropriate coursework. Conclusion: Rather than one size fits all, tailoring education to baseline knowledge, learner background, and future goals increases learning potential while minimizing classroom time.

KW - Assessment

KW - Research training

KW - Statistical competency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922495782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922495782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cts.12204

DO - 10.1111/cts.12204

M3 - Article

C2 - 25212569

AN - SCOPUS:84922495782

VL - 8

SP - 32

EP - 42

JO - Clinical and Translational Science

JF - Clinical and Translational Science

SN - 1752-8054

IS - 1

ER -