Assessing professionalism in early medical education: Experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course

R. E. Bryan, Aaron Krych, S. W. Carmichael, T. R. Viggiano, Wojciech Pawlina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: As today's healthcare model moves toward more streamlined and corporate industrialism, it is our responsibility, as doctors, to ensure the integrity of medicine's foundation in professionalism. The erosion of professional values not only creates a climate of animosity, but reverberates negatively to impact the development of students, who model their behaviour after those they most respect. This hazard has spurred an evaluation of medical school curricula, with a new emphasis on professionalism in the philosophy of medical education. Courses such as Gross Anatomy that, in the past, offered "pure content," are now being used to teach and evaluate professionalism. The goal of this study was to determine if peer evaluation and self-evaluation used in conjunction and implemented early in the medical curriculum, can serve as useful tools to assess and provide feedback regarding professional behaviour in first-year medical students. Materials and Methods: From 1999 to 2003, students at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine evaluated themselves and their peers during the Gross and Developmental Anatomy Course. Numerical evaluations and written comments were statistically analysed within established categories of professionalism and correlated with academic performance, gender, and peer rating and self-rating. Results: The majority of written comments pertained to inter-professional respect, responsibility, and excellence. Students who gave higher peer evaluation and self-evaluation scores provided more positive comments, and students performing well in the course provided more positive comments about their peers and themselves than did those struggling academically. Students consistently rated their peers higher than themselves, and male students rated themselves higher than did female students. Conclusions: Implementing peer evaluation and self-evaluation early in the medical curriculum is a valuable exercise in teaching first-year medical students assessment skills when evaluating their behaviour, as well as the behaviour of their colleagues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)486-491
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore
Volume34
Issue number8
StatePublished - Sep 1 2005

Fingerprint

Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Medical Education
Anatomy
Students
Curriculum
Medical Students
Medicine
Professionalism
Climate
Medical Schools
Teaching
Exercise
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Anatomy
  • Peer evaluation
  • Professionalism
  • Self-evaluation
  • Teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Assessing professionalism in early medical education : Experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course. / Bryan, R. E.; Krych, Aaron; Carmichael, S. W.; Viggiano, T. R.; Pawlina, Wojciech.

In: Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, Vol. 34, No. 8, 01.09.2005, p. 486-491.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{54e80d21e2d14087b54669a95abad293,
title = "Assessing professionalism in early medical education: Experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course",
abstract = "Introduction: As today's healthcare model moves toward more streamlined and corporate industrialism, it is our responsibility, as doctors, to ensure the integrity of medicine's foundation in professionalism. The erosion of professional values not only creates a climate of animosity, but reverberates negatively to impact the development of students, who model their behaviour after those they most respect. This hazard has spurred an evaluation of medical school curricula, with a new emphasis on professionalism in the philosophy of medical education. Courses such as Gross Anatomy that, in the past, offered {"}pure content,{"} are now being used to teach and evaluate professionalism. The goal of this study was to determine if peer evaluation and self-evaluation used in conjunction and implemented early in the medical curriculum, can serve as useful tools to assess and provide feedback regarding professional behaviour in first-year medical students. Materials and Methods: From 1999 to 2003, students at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine evaluated themselves and their peers during the Gross and Developmental Anatomy Course. Numerical evaluations and written comments were statistically analysed within established categories of professionalism and correlated with academic performance, gender, and peer rating and self-rating. Results: The majority of written comments pertained to inter-professional respect, responsibility, and excellence. Students who gave higher peer evaluation and self-evaluation scores provided more positive comments, and students performing well in the course provided more positive comments about their peers and themselves than did those struggling academically. Students consistently rated their peers higher than themselves, and male students rated themselves higher than did female students. Conclusions: Implementing peer evaluation and self-evaluation early in the medical curriculum is a valuable exercise in teaching first-year medical students assessment skills when evaluating their behaviour, as well as the behaviour of their colleagues.",
keywords = "Anatomy, Peer evaluation, Professionalism, Self-evaluation, Teaching",
author = "Bryan, {R. E.} and Aaron Krych and Carmichael, {S. W.} and Viggiano, {T. R.} and Wojciech Pawlina",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "486--491",
journal = "Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore",
issn = "0304-4602",
publisher = "Academy of Medicine Singapore",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing professionalism in early medical education

T2 - Experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course

AU - Bryan, R. E.

AU - Krych, Aaron

AU - Carmichael, S. W.

AU - Viggiano, T. R.

AU - Pawlina, Wojciech

PY - 2005/9/1

Y1 - 2005/9/1

N2 - Introduction: As today's healthcare model moves toward more streamlined and corporate industrialism, it is our responsibility, as doctors, to ensure the integrity of medicine's foundation in professionalism. The erosion of professional values not only creates a climate of animosity, but reverberates negatively to impact the development of students, who model their behaviour after those they most respect. This hazard has spurred an evaluation of medical school curricula, with a new emphasis on professionalism in the philosophy of medical education. Courses such as Gross Anatomy that, in the past, offered "pure content," are now being used to teach and evaluate professionalism. The goal of this study was to determine if peer evaluation and self-evaluation used in conjunction and implemented early in the medical curriculum, can serve as useful tools to assess and provide feedback regarding professional behaviour in first-year medical students. Materials and Methods: From 1999 to 2003, students at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine evaluated themselves and their peers during the Gross and Developmental Anatomy Course. Numerical evaluations and written comments were statistically analysed within established categories of professionalism and correlated with academic performance, gender, and peer rating and self-rating. Results: The majority of written comments pertained to inter-professional respect, responsibility, and excellence. Students who gave higher peer evaluation and self-evaluation scores provided more positive comments, and students performing well in the course provided more positive comments about their peers and themselves than did those struggling academically. Students consistently rated their peers higher than themselves, and male students rated themselves higher than did female students. Conclusions: Implementing peer evaluation and self-evaluation early in the medical curriculum is a valuable exercise in teaching first-year medical students assessment skills when evaluating their behaviour, as well as the behaviour of their colleagues.

AB - Introduction: As today's healthcare model moves toward more streamlined and corporate industrialism, it is our responsibility, as doctors, to ensure the integrity of medicine's foundation in professionalism. The erosion of professional values not only creates a climate of animosity, but reverberates negatively to impact the development of students, who model their behaviour after those they most respect. This hazard has spurred an evaluation of medical school curricula, with a new emphasis on professionalism in the philosophy of medical education. Courses such as Gross Anatomy that, in the past, offered "pure content," are now being used to teach and evaluate professionalism. The goal of this study was to determine if peer evaluation and self-evaluation used in conjunction and implemented early in the medical curriculum, can serve as useful tools to assess and provide feedback regarding professional behaviour in first-year medical students. Materials and Methods: From 1999 to 2003, students at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine evaluated themselves and their peers during the Gross and Developmental Anatomy Course. Numerical evaluations and written comments were statistically analysed within established categories of professionalism and correlated with academic performance, gender, and peer rating and self-rating. Results: The majority of written comments pertained to inter-professional respect, responsibility, and excellence. Students who gave higher peer evaluation and self-evaluation scores provided more positive comments, and students performing well in the course provided more positive comments about their peers and themselves than did those struggling academically. Students consistently rated their peers higher than themselves, and male students rated themselves higher than did female students. Conclusions: Implementing peer evaluation and self-evaluation early in the medical curriculum is a valuable exercise in teaching first-year medical students assessment skills when evaluating their behaviour, as well as the behaviour of their colleagues.

KW - Anatomy

KW - Peer evaluation

KW - Professionalism

KW - Self-evaluation

KW - Teaching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144489984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27144489984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16205826

AN - SCOPUS:27144489984

VL - 34

SP - 486

EP - 491

JO - Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore

JF - Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore

SN - 0304-4602

IS - 8

ER -