TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Kunneman, Marleen
AU - Gravholt, Derek
AU - Hartasanchez, Sandra A.
AU - Gionfriddo, Michael R.
AU - Paskins, Zoe
AU - Prokop, Larry J.
AU - Stiggelbout, Anne M.
AU - Montori, Victor M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Marleen Kunneman had financial support from the Dutch Research Council (NWO) and The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) (#016.196.138) for the submitted work. Zoe Paskins is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (Clinician Scientist Award (CS‐2018‐18‐ST2‐010)/NIHR Academy). All other authors received no financial support for the submitted work; all authors declare no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank all reviewers who helped with the full‐text screening of papers in other languages than English: Zhen Wang (Chinese), Zeljko Molivaz (Croatian), Lenka Juricekova (Czech and Slovak), Sandra Hartasanchez (French and Spanish), Marleen Kunneman (German), Spyridoula Maraka (Greek), Rachel Giblon (Hebrew), Viki Vereczki (Hungarian), Lee Yew Kong (Malay), Elizabeth Golembiewski (Polish), Marina de Toledo Barros Zullino (Portuguese), Rozalina McCoy (Russian) and Martina Peloza (Slovenian). This work was supported by and conducted independently of the Dutch Research Council (NWO) and The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) (#016.196.138).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: For too many people, their care plans are designed without fully accounting for who they are, the lives they live, what matters to them or what they aspire to achieve. We aimed to summarize instruments capable of measuring dimensions of patient–clinician collaboration to make care fit. Methods: We systematically searched several databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science) from inception to September 2021 for studies using quantitative measures to assess, evaluate or rate the work of making care fit by any participant in real-life clinical encounters. Eligibility was assessed in duplicate. After extracting all items from relevant instruments, we coded them deductively on dimensions relevant to making care fit (as presented in a recent Making Care Fit Manifesto), and inductively on the main action described. Results: We included 189 papers, mostly from North America (N = 83, 44%) and in the context of primary care (N = 54, 29%). Half of the papers (N = 88, 47%) were published in the last 5 years. We found 1243 relevant items to assess efforts of making care fit, included within 151 instruments. Most items related to the dimensions ‘Patient-clinician collaboration: content’ (N = 396, 32%) and ‘Patient-clinician collaboration: manner’ (N = 382, 31%) and the least related to ‘Ongoing and iterative process’ (N = 22, 2%) and in ‘Minimally disruptive of patient lives’ (N = 29, 2%). The items referred to 27 specific actions. Most items referred to ‘Informing’ (N = 308, 25%) and ‘Exploring’ (N = 93, 8%), the fewest items referred to ‘Following up’, ‘Comforting’ and ‘Praising’ (each N = 3, 0.2%). Discussion: Measures of the work that patients and clinicians do together to make care fit focus heavily on the content of their collaborations, particularly on exchanging information. Other dimensions and actions previously identified as crucial to making care fit are assessed infrequently or not at all. The breadth of extant measures of making care fit and the lack of appropriate measures of this key construct limit both the assessment and the successful implementation of efforts to improve patient care. Patient Contribution: Patients and caregivers from the ‘Making care fit Collaborative’ were involved in drafting the dimensions relevant to patient–clinician collaboration.
AB - Introduction: For too many people, their care plans are designed without fully accounting for who they are, the lives they live, what matters to them or what they aspire to achieve. We aimed to summarize instruments capable of measuring dimensions of patient–clinician collaboration to make care fit. Methods: We systematically searched several databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science) from inception to September 2021 for studies using quantitative measures to assess, evaluate or rate the work of making care fit by any participant in real-life clinical encounters. Eligibility was assessed in duplicate. After extracting all items from relevant instruments, we coded them deductively on dimensions relevant to making care fit (as presented in a recent Making Care Fit Manifesto), and inductively on the main action described. Results: We included 189 papers, mostly from North America (N = 83, 44%) and in the context of primary care (N = 54, 29%). Half of the papers (N = 88, 47%) were published in the last 5 years. We found 1243 relevant items to assess efforts of making care fit, included within 151 instruments. Most items related to the dimensions ‘Patient-clinician collaboration: content’ (N = 396, 32%) and ‘Patient-clinician collaboration: manner’ (N = 382, 31%) and the least related to ‘Ongoing and iterative process’ (N = 22, 2%) and in ‘Minimally disruptive of patient lives’ (N = 29, 2%). The items referred to 27 specific actions. Most items referred to ‘Informing’ (N = 308, 25%) and ‘Exploring’ (N = 93, 8%), the fewest items referred to ‘Following up’, ‘Comforting’ and ‘Praising’ (each N = 3, 0.2%). Discussion: Measures of the work that patients and clinicians do together to make care fit focus heavily on the content of their collaborations, particularly on exchanging information. Other dimensions and actions previously identified as crucial to making care fit are assessed infrequently or not at all. The breadth of extant measures of making care fit and the lack of appropriate measures of this key construct limit both the assessment and the successful implementation of efforts to improve patient care. Patient Contribution: Patients and caregivers from the ‘Making care fit Collaborative’ were involved in drafting the dimensions relevant to patient–clinician collaboration.
KW - making care fit
KW - medical decision making
KW - patient involvement
KW - patient–clinician communication
KW - shared decision making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85153287361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85153287361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/hex.13759
DO - 10.1111/hex.13759
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85153287361
SN - 1369-6513
JO - Health Expectations
JF - Health Expectations
ER -