Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing: Potential receptivity to computed tomographic colonography

Timothy J. Beebe, C. Daniel Johnson, Sarah M. Stoner, Kari J. Anderson, Paul John Limburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether removal of the laxative preparation would improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. RESPONDENTS AND METHODS: Data are from a mixe-mode mall and telephone survey of 1636 noninstitutionalized Minnesota residents who were 18 years or older that was conducted from July 15 through October 25, 2005. The overall response rate was 49%. Analysis focused on the 759 respondents who were 50 years or older. RESULTS: One third (32%) of the respondents identified the laxative preparation as the most troublesome part of CRC screening. Overall, the self-reported likelihood and anticipated timing of examination increase when the laxative preparation is removed. Both univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the odds of being "much more likely" to undergo screening in the future with a test that does not includs a laxative preparation are greatest among those who have been tested previously, regard the laxative preparation as a big problem, or both. CONCLUSION: In this prospective survey, laxative preparation appeared to be a major disincentive to CRC screening. Emerging data suggest that performance of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography may represent an attractive option that removes this relatively common disincentive to CRC screening participation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)666-671
Number of pages6
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
Volume82
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Computed Tomographic Colonography
Laxatives
Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Motivation
Telephone
Multivariate Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{9202643e1f5744cdb4d077c39cff5eee,
title = "Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing: Potential receptivity to computed tomographic colonography",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether removal of the laxative preparation would improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. RESPONDENTS AND METHODS: Data are from a mixe-mode mall and telephone survey of 1636 noninstitutionalized Minnesota residents who were 18 years or older that was conducted from July 15 through October 25, 2005. The overall response rate was 49{\%}. Analysis focused on the 759 respondents who were 50 years or older. RESULTS: One third (32{\%}) of the respondents identified the laxative preparation as the most troublesome part of CRC screening. Overall, the self-reported likelihood and anticipated timing of examination increase when the laxative preparation is removed. Both univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the odds of being {"}much more likely{"} to undergo screening in the future with a test that does not includs a laxative preparation are greatest among those who have been tested previously, regard the laxative preparation as a big problem, or both. CONCLUSION: In this prospective survey, laxative preparation appeared to be a major disincentive to CRC screening. Emerging data suggest that performance of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography may represent an attractive option that removes this relatively common disincentive to CRC screening participation.",
author = "Beebe, {Timothy J.} and Johnson, {C. Daniel} and Stoner, {Sarah M.} and Anderson, {Kari J.} and Limburg, {Paul John}",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.4065/82.6.666",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "666--671",
journal = "Mayo Clinic Proceedings",
issn = "0025-6196",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing

T2 - Potential receptivity to computed tomographic colonography

AU - Beebe, Timothy J.

AU - Johnson, C. Daniel

AU - Stoner, Sarah M.

AU - Anderson, Kari J.

AU - Limburg, Paul John

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether removal of the laxative preparation would improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. RESPONDENTS AND METHODS: Data are from a mixe-mode mall and telephone survey of 1636 noninstitutionalized Minnesota residents who were 18 years or older that was conducted from July 15 through October 25, 2005. The overall response rate was 49%. Analysis focused on the 759 respondents who were 50 years or older. RESULTS: One third (32%) of the respondents identified the laxative preparation as the most troublesome part of CRC screening. Overall, the self-reported likelihood and anticipated timing of examination increase when the laxative preparation is removed. Both univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the odds of being "much more likely" to undergo screening in the future with a test that does not includs a laxative preparation are greatest among those who have been tested previously, regard the laxative preparation as a big problem, or both. CONCLUSION: In this prospective survey, laxative preparation appeared to be a major disincentive to CRC screening. Emerging data suggest that performance of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography may represent an attractive option that removes this relatively common disincentive to CRC screening participation.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether removal of the laxative preparation would improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. RESPONDENTS AND METHODS: Data are from a mixe-mode mall and telephone survey of 1636 noninstitutionalized Minnesota residents who were 18 years or older that was conducted from July 15 through October 25, 2005. The overall response rate was 49%. Analysis focused on the 759 respondents who were 50 years or older. RESULTS: One third (32%) of the respondents identified the laxative preparation as the most troublesome part of CRC screening. Overall, the self-reported likelihood and anticipated timing of examination increase when the laxative preparation is removed. Both univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the odds of being "much more likely" to undergo screening in the future with a test that does not includs a laxative preparation are greatest among those who have been tested previously, regard the laxative preparation as a big problem, or both. CONCLUSION: In this prospective survey, laxative preparation appeared to be a major disincentive to CRC screening. Emerging data suggest that performance of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography may represent an attractive option that removes this relatively common disincentive to CRC screening participation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249944908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249944908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4065/82.6.666

DO - 10.4065/82.6.666

M3 - Article

C2 - 17550745

AN - SCOPUS:34249944908

VL - 82

SP - 666

EP - 671

JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

SN - 0025-6196

IS - 6

ER -