Assessing and predicting the likelihood of interventions during routine annual follow-up visits for management of obstructive sleep

Srikant Nannapaneni, Timothy Ian Morgenthaler, Kannan Ramar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objectives: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on established positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment are often advised routine annual follow-up visits to assess ongoing effectiveness and address problems associated with therapy. This study evaluates the clinical utility of annual face-to-face follow-up visits. Design: We performed a retrospective chart review of OSA patients on PAP who had completed a routine annual follow-up visit. Demographics, polysomnography, PAP compliance, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), subjective complaints (efficacy and interface issues, equipment malfunction, prescription renewal), objective findings (efficacy or leak issues, equipment problems), and visit-specific interventions were recorded. We determined relationships between patient provided information and likelihood of therapeutic versus administrative interventions. Setting: Academic sleep center. Measurements and Results: Among 716 patients who met study criteria, we abstracted data on 180 randomly selected patients. On multivariate analyses, only subjective complaints or objective findings by providers were associated with a therapeutic intervention (p < 0.0001). Though most patients (55 of 63 patients, 87.3%) who required therapeutic interventions had objective findings, without subjective complaints, the odds of such findings were only 0.12 (95% CI = 0.06-0.24, p < 0.0001). Without subjective complaints, the likelihood of a therapeutic intervention was 0.07 (95% CI = 0.03-0.15, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our data suggests that in the absence of a subjective complaint, an annual follow-up is more likely to require administrative rather than face-to-face clinical intervention. Designing a clinic model to account for this might reduce resource utilization. However, the value and optimal timing of "routine" annual follow-up visits requires further evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)919-924
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
Volume10
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Sleep
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Pressure
Therapeutics
Equipment Failure
Polysomnography
Compliance
Prescriptions
Multivariate Analysis
Demography
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Clinic visits
  • Complaints
  • CPAP
  • Follow-up
  • Obstructive sleep apnea

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Neurology

Cite this

Assessing and predicting the likelihood of interventions during routine annual follow-up visits for management of obstructive sleep. / Nannapaneni, Srikant; Morgenthaler, Timothy Ian; Ramar, Kannan.

In: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 8, 2014, p. 919-924.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7e92fc3dae0c40e5a38ba681d21b74a1,
title = "Assessing and predicting the likelihood of interventions during routine annual follow-up visits for management of obstructive sleep",
abstract = "Study Objectives: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on established positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment are often advised routine annual follow-up visits to assess ongoing effectiveness and address problems associated with therapy. This study evaluates the clinical utility of annual face-to-face follow-up visits. Design: We performed a retrospective chart review of OSA patients on PAP who had completed a routine annual follow-up visit. Demographics, polysomnography, PAP compliance, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), subjective complaints (efficacy and interface issues, equipment malfunction, prescription renewal), objective findings (efficacy or leak issues, equipment problems), and visit-specific interventions were recorded. We determined relationships between patient provided information and likelihood of therapeutic versus administrative interventions. Setting: Academic sleep center. Measurements and Results: Among 716 patients who met study criteria, we abstracted data on 180 randomly selected patients. On multivariate analyses, only subjective complaints or objective findings by providers were associated with a therapeutic intervention (p < 0.0001). Though most patients (55 of 63 patients, 87.3{\%}) who required therapeutic interventions had objective findings, without subjective complaints, the odds of such findings were only 0.12 (95{\%} CI = 0.06-0.24, p < 0.0001). Without subjective complaints, the likelihood of a therapeutic intervention was 0.07 (95{\%} CI = 0.03-0.15, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our data suggests that in the absence of a subjective complaint, an annual follow-up is more likely to require administrative rather than face-to-face clinical intervention. Designing a clinic model to account for this might reduce resource utilization. However, the value and optimal timing of {"}routine{"} annual follow-up visits requires further evaluation.",
keywords = "Clinic visits, Complaints, CPAP, Follow-up, Obstructive sleep apnea",
author = "Srikant Nannapaneni and Morgenthaler, {Timothy Ian} and Kannan Ramar",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5664/jcsm.3972",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "919--924",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine",
issn = "1550-9389",
publisher = "American Academy of Sleep Medicine",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing and predicting the likelihood of interventions during routine annual follow-up visits for management of obstructive sleep

AU - Nannapaneni, Srikant

AU - Morgenthaler, Timothy Ian

AU - Ramar, Kannan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Study Objectives: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on established positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment are often advised routine annual follow-up visits to assess ongoing effectiveness and address problems associated with therapy. This study evaluates the clinical utility of annual face-to-face follow-up visits. Design: We performed a retrospective chart review of OSA patients on PAP who had completed a routine annual follow-up visit. Demographics, polysomnography, PAP compliance, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), subjective complaints (efficacy and interface issues, equipment malfunction, prescription renewal), objective findings (efficacy or leak issues, equipment problems), and visit-specific interventions were recorded. We determined relationships between patient provided information and likelihood of therapeutic versus administrative interventions. Setting: Academic sleep center. Measurements and Results: Among 716 patients who met study criteria, we abstracted data on 180 randomly selected patients. On multivariate analyses, only subjective complaints or objective findings by providers were associated with a therapeutic intervention (p < 0.0001). Though most patients (55 of 63 patients, 87.3%) who required therapeutic interventions had objective findings, without subjective complaints, the odds of such findings were only 0.12 (95% CI = 0.06-0.24, p < 0.0001). Without subjective complaints, the likelihood of a therapeutic intervention was 0.07 (95% CI = 0.03-0.15, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our data suggests that in the absence of a subjective complaint, an annual follow-up is more likely to require administrative rather than face-to-face clinical intervention. Designing a clinic model to account for this might reduce resource utilization. However, the value and optimal timing of "routine" annual follow-up visits requires further evaluation.

AB - Study Objectives: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on established positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment are often advised routine annual follow-up visits to assess ongoing effectiveness and address problems associated with therapy. This study evaluates the clinical utility of annual face-to-face follow-up visits. Design: We performed a retrospective chart review of OSA patients on PAP who had completed a routine annual follow-up visit. Demographics, polysomnography, PAP compliance, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), subjective complaints (efficacy and interface issues, equipment malfunction, prescription renewal), objective findings (efficacy or leak issues, equipment problems), and visit-specific interventions were recorded. We determined relationships between patient provided information and likelihood of therapeutic versus administrative interventions. Setting: Academic sleep center. Measurements and Results: Among 716 patients who met study criteria, we abstracted data on 180 randomly selected patients. On multivariate analyses, only subjective complaints or objective findings by providers were associated with a therapeutic intervention (p < 0.0001). Though most patients (55 of 63 patients, 87.3%) who required therapeutic interventions had objective findings, without subjective complaints, the odds of such findings were only 0.12 (95% CI = 0.06-0.24, p < 0.0001). Without subjective complaints, the likelihood of a therapeutic intervention was 0.07 (95% CI = 0.03-0.15, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our data suggests that in the absence of a subjective complaint, an annual follow-up is more likely to require administrative rather than face-to-face clinical intervention. Designing a clinic model to account for this might reduce resource utilization. However, the value and optimal timing of "routine" annual follow-up visits requires further evaluation.

KW - Clinic visits

KW - Complaints

KW - CPAP

KW - Follow-up

KW - Obstructive sleep apnea

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940265982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940265982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5664/jcsm.3972

DO - 10.5664/jcsm.3972

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 919

EP - 924

JO - Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine

JF - Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine

SN - 1550-9389

IS - 8

ER -