Areal and volumetric bone density in Hong Kong Chinese: A comparison with Caucasians living in the United States

E. M C Lau, H. Lynn, J. Woo, L. J. Melton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is a common perception that Asians have lower bone density than Caucasians. However, such relationships could be confounded by bone size. In this study, the skeletal status of a convenience sample of 482 men and 887 women living in Hong Kong is compared with published data for Caucasians living in Rochester, Minnesota. Areal bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) and volumetric bone mineral apparent density (BMAD, g/cm3) were determined for the lumbar spine and proximal femur, using the Hologic QDR 2000 instrument. Cross-calibration was performed by measuring a common phantom, and the Hong Kong data were adjusted by a multiplication factor. Lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD and BMAD of Chinese men and women were all significantly lower (P < 0.001 by t-test) than those of Caucasians, but the differences in BMAD were on average only about half the size of the differences in BMD. For instance, in postmenopausal Chinese women, BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were 15.2% and 18.8% lower respectively, but BMAD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were only 7.8% and 12.4% lower respectively. Similar trends were observed in men. After adjusting for age, body height and weight, the difference in BMAD between Caucasians and Chinese was further reduced and only statistically significant among postmenopausal women and among men younger than age 50 years for the lumbar spine. For instance, the adjusted BMAD in postmenopausal Chinese women at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were 3.9% (P = 0.03 by ANCOVA) and 7.3% (P < 0.001 by ANCOVA) lower respectively, while the adjusted BMAD at the lumbar spine for Chinese men younger than 50 years was 11.7% lower (P < 0.01 by ANCOVA). Predictors of BMAD in Hong Kong Chinese women include body weight, age at menarche, cigarette smoking, and oral contraceptive use (P < 0.001), while body weight was the only independent predictor of BMAD in Hong Kong Chinese men (P < 0.001). We conclude that bone density is lower in Hong Kong Chinese men and women than in Caucasians, although such differences were attenuated by adjustments for bone size, body weight and height.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)583-588
Number of pages6
JournalOsteoporosis International
Volume14
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2003

Fingerprint

Hong Kong
Bone Density
Spine
Femur Neck
Body Weight
Body Height
Bone and Bones
Menarche
Oral Contraceptives
Femur
Calibration
Smoking

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Asians
  • Bone mineral density
  • Chinese
  • Ethnic groups
  • Osteoporosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Areal and volumetric bone density in Hong Kong Chinese : A comparison with Caucasians living in the United States. / Lau, E. M C; Lynn, H.; Woo, J.; Melton, L. J.

In: Osteoporosis International, Vol. 14, No. 7, 01.07.2003, p. 583-588.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lau, E. M C ; Lynn, H. ; Woo, J. ; Melton, L. J. / Areal and volumetric bone density in Hong Kong Chinese : A comparison with Caucasians living in the United States. In: Osteoporosis International. 2003 ; Vol. 14, No. 7. pp. 583-588.
@article{8d4e22ea8dcd4d0bbef3a27fe6038a1c,
title = "Areal and volumetric bone density in Hong Kong Chinese: A comparison with Caucasians living in the United States",
abstract = "It is a common perception that Asians have lower bone density than Caucasians. However, such relationships could be confounded by bone size. In this study, the skeletal status of a convenience sample of 482 men and 887 women living in Hong Kong is compared with published data for Caucasians living in Rochester, Minnesota. Areal bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) and volumetric bone mineral apparent density (BMAD, g/cm3) were determined for the lumbar spine and proximal femur, using the Hologic QDR 2000 instrument. Cross-calibration was performed by measuring a common phantom, and the Hong Kong data were adjusted by a multiplication factor. Lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD and BMAD of Chinese men and women were all significantly lower (P < 0.001 by t-test) than those of Caucasians, but the differences in BMAD were on average only about half the size of the differences in BMD. For instance, in postmenopausal Chinese women, BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were 15.2{\%} and 18.8{\%} lower respectively, but BMAD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were only 7.8{\%} and 12.4{\%} lower respectively. Similar trends were observed in men. After adjusting for age, body height and weight, the difference in BMAD between Caucasians and Chinese was further reduced and only statistically significant among postmenopausal women and among men younger than age 50 years for the lumbar spine. For instance, the adjusted BMAD in postmenopausal Chinese women at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were 3.9{\%} (P = 0.03 by ANCOVA) and 7.3{\%} (P < 0.001 by ANCOVA) lower respectively, while the adjusted BMAD at the lumbar spine for Chinese men younger than 50 years was 11.7{\%} lower (P < 0.01 by ANCOVA). Predictors of BMAD in Hong Kong Chinese women include body weight, age at menarche, cigarette smoking, and oral contraceptive use (P < 0.001), while body weight was the only independent predictor of BMAD in Hong Kong Chinese men (P < 0.001). We conclude that bone density is lower in Hong Kong Chinese men and women than in Caucasians, although such differences were attenuated by adjustments for bone size, body weight and height.",
keywords = "Aging, Asians, Bone mineral density, Chinese, Ethnic groups, Osteoporosis",
author = "Lau, {E. M C} and H. Lynn and J. Woo and Melton, {L. J.}",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00198-003-1402-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "583--588",
journal = "Osteoporosis International",
issn = "0937-941X",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Areal and volumetric bone density in Hong Kong Chinese

T2 - A comparison with Caucasians living in the United States

AU - Lau, E. M C

AU - Lynn, H.

AU - Woo, J.

AU - Melton, L. J.

PY - 2003/7/1

Y1 - 2003/7/1

N2 - It is a common perception that Asians have lower bone density than Caucasians. However, such relationships could be confounded by bone size. In this study, the skeletal status of a convenience sample of 482 men and 887 women living in Hong Kong is compared with published data for Caucasians living in Rochester, Minnesota. Areal bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) and volumetric bone mineral apparent density (BMAD, g/cm3) were determined for the lumbar spine and proximal femur, using the Hologic QDR 2000 instrument. Cross-calibration was performed by measuring a common phantom, and the Hong Kong data were adjusted by a multiplication factor. Lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD and BMAD of Chinese men and women were all significantly lower (P < 0.001 by t-test) than those of Caucasians, but the differences in BMAD were on average only about half the size of the differences in BMD. For instance, in postmenopausal Chinese women, BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were 15.2% and 18.8% lower respectively, but BMAD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were only 7.8% and 12.4% lower respectively. Similar trends were observed in men. After adjusting for age, body height and weight, the difference in BMAD between Caucasians and Chinese was further reduced and only statistically significant among postmenopausal women and among men younger than age 50 years for the lumbar spine. For instance, the adjusted BMAD in postmenopausal Chinese women at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were 3.9% (P = 0.03 by ANCOVA) and 7.3% (P < 0.001 by ANCOVA) lower respectively, while the adjusted BMAD at the lumbar spine for Chinese men younger than 50 years was 11.7% lower (P < 0.01 by ANCOVA). Predictors of BMAD in Hong Kong Chinese women include body weight, age at menarche, cigarette smoking, and oral contraceptive use (P < 0.001), while body weight was the only independent predictor of BMAD in Hong Kong Chinese men (P < 0.001). We conclude that bone density is lower in Hong Kong Chinese men and women than in Caucasians, although such differences were attenuated by adjustments for bone size, body weight and height.

AB - It is a common perception that Asians have lower bone density than Caucasians. However, such relationships could be confounded by bone size. In this study, the skeletal status of a convenience sample of 482 men and 887 women living in Hong Kong is compared with published data for Caucasians living in Rochester, Minnesota. Areal bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) and volumetric bone mineral apparent density (BMAD, g/cm3) were determined for the lumbar spine and proximal femur, using the Hologic QDR 2000 instrument. Cross-calibration was performed by measuring a common phantom, and the Hong Kong data were adjusted by a multiplication factor. Lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD and BMAD of Chinese men and women were all significantly lower (P < 0.001 by t-test) than those of Caucasians, but the differences in BMAD were on average only about half the size of the differences in BMD. For instance, in postmenopausal Chinese women, BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were 15.2% and 18.8% lower respectively, but BMAD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were only 7.8% and 12.4% lower respectively. Similar trends were observed in men. After adjusting for age, body height and weight, the difference in BMAD between Caucasians and Chinese was further reduced and only statistically significant among postmenopausal women and among men younger than age 50 years for the lumbar spine. For instance, the adjusted BMAD in postmenopausal Chinese women at the femoral neck and lumbar spine were 3.9% (P = 0.03 by ANCOVA) and 7.3% (P < 0.001 by ANCOVA) lower respectively, while the adjusted BMAD at the lumbar spine for Chinese men younger than 50 years was 11.7% lower (P < 0.01 by ANCOVA). Predictors of BMAD in Hong Kong Chinese women include body weight, age at menarche, cigarette smoking, and oral contraceptive use (P < 0.001), while body weight was the only independent predictor of BMAD in Hong Kong Chinese men (P < 0.001). We conclude that bone density is lower in Hong Kong Chinese men and women than in Caucasians, although such differences were attenuated by adjustments for bone size, body weight and height.

KW - Aging

KW - Asians

KW - Bone mineral density

KW - Chinese

KW - Ethnic groups

KW - Osteoporosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0043028690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0043028690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00198-003-1402-7

DO - 10.1007/s00198-003-1402-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 12827221

AN - SCOPUS:0043028690

VL - 14

SP - 583

EP - 588

JO - Osteoporosis International

JF - Osteoporosis International

SN - 0937-941X

IS - 7

ER -