Are the best coronary artery bypass surgeons identified by physician surveys?

Arthur J. Hartz, Jose S Pulido, Evelyn M. Kuhn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. This study assessed the validity of surveys for identifying the best coronary artery bypass surgeons. Methods. Data on physicians who performed coronary artery bypass surgery were available from New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Data on physicians' reputation were obtained from one national and five city surveys. The measure of surgical performance was the mortality ratio (MR), that is, the ratio of the observed to the predicted patient mortality rate. Results. Mortality ratios were very similar for the 10722 patients treated by the 31 surgeons defined as 'best' doctors in the surveys (MR = .98) and for the 74 854 patients treated by 243 other surgeons who had more than a minimal number of cases (MR = .96). The mortality ratio was 1.34 for the patients treated by surgeons with the lowest volumes and .87 for the surgeons who performed more than 400 coronary artery bypass surgeries in 3 years. Conclusions. These results suggest that the quality of a coronary artery bypass surgeon may be more closely associated with patient volume than with the surgeon's reputation among peers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1645-1648
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume87
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Coronary Artery Bypass
Physicians
Mortality
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Are the best coronary artery bypass surgeons identified by physician surveys? / Hartz, Arthur J.; Pulido, Jose S; Kuhn, Evelyn M.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 87, No. 10, 10.1997, p. 1645-1648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b22ad2fbd2ca41989b61dddf38a74486,
title = "Are the best coronary artery bypass surgeons identified by physician surveys?",
abstract = "Objectives. This study assessed the validity of surveys for identifying the best coronary artery bypass surgeons. Methods. Data on physicians who performed coronary artery bypass surgery were available from New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Data on physicians' reputation were obtained from one national and five city surveys. The measure of surgical performance was the mortality ratio (MR), that is, the ratio of the observed to the predicted patient mortality rate. Results. Mortality ratios were very similar for the 10722 patients treated by the 31 surgeons defined as 'best' doctors in the surveys (MR = .98) and for the 74 854 patients treated by 243 other surgeons who had more than a minimal number of cases (MR = .96). The mortality ratio was 1.34 for the patients treated by surgeons with the lowest volumes and .87 for the surgeons who performed more than 400 coronary artery bypass surgeries in 3 years. Conclusions. These results suggest that the quality of a coronary artery bypass surgeon may be more closely associated with patient volume than with the surgeon's reputation among peers.",
author = "Hartz, {Arthur J.} and Pulido, {Jose S} and Kuhn, {Evelyn M.}",
year = "1997",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "1645--1648",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are the best coronary artery bypass surgeons identified by physician surveys?

AU - Hartz, Arthur J.

AU - Pulido, Jose S

AU - Kuhn, Evelyn M.

PY - 1997/10

Y1 - 1997/10

N2 - Objectives. This study assessed the validity of surveys for identifying the best coronary artery bypass surgeons. Methods. Data on physicians who performed coronary artery bypass surgery were available from New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Data on physicians' reputation were obtained from one national and five city surveys. The measure of surgical performance was the mortality ratio (MR), that is, the ratio of the observed to the predicted patient mortality rate. Results. Mortality ratios were very similar for the 10722 patients treated by the 31 surgeons defined as 'best' doctors in the surveys (MR = .98) and for the 74 854 patients treated by 243 other surgeons who had more than a minimal number of cases (MR = .96). The mortality ratio was 1.34 for the patients treated by surgeons with the lowest volumes and .87 for the surgeons who performed more than 400 coronary artery bypass surgeries in 3 years. Conclusions. These results suggest that the quality of a coronary artery bypass surgeon may be more closely associated with patient volume than with the surgeon's reputation among peers.

AB - Objectives. This study assessed the validity of surveys for identifying the best coronary artery bypass surgeons. Methods. Data on physicians who performed coronary artery bypass surgery were available from New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Data on physicians' reputation were obtained from one national and five city surveys. The measure of surgical performance was the mortality ratio (MR), that is, the ratio of the observed to the predicted patient mortality rate. Results. Mortality ratios were very similar for the 10722 patients treated by the 31 surgeons defined as 'best' doctors in the surveys (MR = .98) and for the 74 854 patients treated by 243 other surgeons who had more than a minimal number of cases (MR = .96). The mortality ratio was 1.34 for the patients treated by surgeons with the lowest volumes and .87 for the surgeons who performed more than 400 coronary artery bypass surgeries in 3 years. Conclusions. These results suggest that the quality of a coronary artery bypass surgeon may be more closely associated with patient volume than with the surgeon's reputation among peers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030690284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030690284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9357346

AN - SCOPUS:0030690284

VL - 87

SP - 1645

EP - 1648

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 10

ER -