Application of the noise power spectrum to positron emission CT self-absorption correction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two methods are compared in correcting for self-absorption in positron emission CT scans, or equivalently, in determining the integral of attenuation along a strip in a cross section. These are CT reconstruction and direct measurement. It is shown that the former method is slightly more precise than the latter with the degree of improvement proportional to the number of angles used. Additionally, it is demonstrated that the CT approach is statistically very inefficient in its use of detected events in comparison to the direct approach. For the CT case, it is shown using the noise power spectrum that two-thirds of the variance in the attenuation integral is from one projection alone, namely that along the direction of the strip. The remaining one-third is primarily from adjacent projections. For the problem of determining the attenuation in a single strip within the slice, the CT approach is not recommended. However, if the problem is extended to a complete set of strips within the slice, as is desired in positron emission CT, the CT approach may require considerably less counting time than the direct approach for comparable precision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)220-224
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Physics
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1981
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electrons
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Application of the noise power spectrum to positron emission CT self-absorption correction. / Riederer, Stephen J.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1981, p. 220-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3cad1eec99d34109bfe913310535d995,
title = "Application of the noise power spectrum to positron emission CT self-absorption correction",
abstract = "Two methods are compared in correcting for self-absorption in positron emission CT scans, or equivalently, in determining the integral of attenuation along a strip in a cross section. These are CT reconstruction and direct measurement. It is shown that the former method is slightly more precise than the latter with the degree of improvement proportional to the number of angles used. Additionally, it is demonstrated that the CT approach is statistically very inefficient in its use of detected events in comparison to the direct approach. For the CT case, it is shown using the noise power spectrum that two-thirds of the variance in the attenuation integral is from one projection alone, namely that along the direction of the strip. The remaining one-third is primarily from adjacent projections. For the problem of determining the attenuation in a single strip within the slice, the CT approach is not recommended. However, if the problem is extended to a complete set of strips within the slice, as is desired in positron emission CT, the CT approach may require considerably less counting time than the direct approach for comparable precision.",
author = "Riederer, {Stephen J}",
year = "1981",
doi = "10.1118/1.594937",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "220--224",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of the noise power spectrum to positron emission CT self-absorption correction

AU - Riederer, Stephen J

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - Two methods are compared in correcting for self-absorption in positron emission CT scans, or equivalently, in determining the integral of attenuation along a strip in a cross section. These are CT reconstruction and direct measurement. It is shown that the former method is slightly more precise than the latter with the degree of improvement proportional to the number of angles used. Additionally, it is demonstrated that the CT approach is statistically very inefficient in its use of detected events in comparison to the direct approach. For the CT case, it is shown using the noise power spectrum that two-thirds of the variance in the attenuation integral is from one projection alone, namely that along the direction of the strip. The remaining one-third is primarily from adjacent projections. For the problem of determining the attenuation in a single strip within the slice, the CT approach is not recommended. However, if the problem is extended to a complete set of strips within the slice, as is desired in positron emission CT, the CT approach may require considerably less counting time than the direct approach for comparable precision.

AB - Two methods are compared in correcting for self-absorption in positron emission CT scans, or equivalently, in determining the integral of attenuation along a strip in a cross section. These are CT reconstruction and direct measurement. It is shown that the former method is slightly more precise than the latter with the degree of improvement proportional to the number of angles used. Additionally, it is demonstrated that the CT approach is statistically very inefficient in its use of detected events in comparison to the direct approach. For the CT case, it is shown using the noise power spectrum that two-thirds of the variance in the attenuation integral is from one projection alone, namely that along the direction of the strip. The remaining one-third is primarily from adjacent projections. For the problem of determining the attenuation in a single strip within the slice, the CT approach is not recommended. However, if the problem is extended to a complete set of strips within the slice, as is desired in positron emission CT, the CT approach may require considerably less counting time than the direct approach for comparable precision.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019523336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019523336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.594937

DO - 10.1118/1.594937

M3 - Article

C2 - 6976506

AN - SCOPUS:0019523336

VL - 8

SP - 220

EP - 224

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 2

ER -