Application of the Appropriateness Criteria for Echocardiography in an Academic Medical Center

Niti R. Aggarwal, Punsak Wuthiwaropas, Barry L. Karon, Fletcher A Jr. Miller, Patricia Pellikka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The authors examined the feasibility of application of the American College of Cardiology Foundation's appropriateness criteria for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at a large tertiary care practice. Methods: Indications for consecutive TTE and TEE were determined by chart review and classified according to the guidelines as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain or, for situations not addressed in the document, nonclassifiable. Results: Of the 529 studies reviewed, 469 were appropriate, 23 inappropriate, 1 uncertain, and 36 nonclassifiable. Inappropriate and nonclassifiable studies were more commonly TTE than TEE (P < .001). Inappropriate studies were more common in outpatients than inpatients (P < .001). Nonclassifiable cases included assessment after radiofrequency ablation (33.3%) and preoperative evaluation (8.3%). Disagreement between observers in selection of the criterion was present in 30.8%. Conclusions: Although the study was conducted retrospectively, only 4.7% of classifiable studies were inappropriate. The reproducibility of classification was moderate, and 6.8% of studies were not classifiable. Areas for improvement of the criteria were identified.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-274
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Transesophageal Echocardiography
Echocardiography
Tertiary Healthcare
Patient Selection
Inpatients
Outpatients
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Appropriateness
  • Echocardiography
  • Imaging
  • Transesophageal echocardiography
  • Transthoracic echocardiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Application of the Appropriateness Criteria for Echocardiography in an Academic Medical Center. / Aggarwal, Niti R.; Wuthiwaropas, Punsak; Karon, Barry L.; Miller, Fletcher A Jr.; Pellikka, Patricia.

In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, Vol. 23, No. 3, 03.2010, p. 267-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b7c1dffba5144bb7bdbfe2ed387e26eb,
title = "Application of the Appropriateness Criteria for Echocardiography in an Academic Medical Center",
abstract = "Background: The authors examined the feasibility of application of the American College of Cardiology Foundation's appropriateness criteria for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at a large tertiary care practice. Methods: Indications for consecutive TTE and TEE were determined by chart review and classified according to the guidelines as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain or, for situations not addressed in the document, nonclassifiable. Results: Of the 529 studies reviewed, 469 were appropriate, 23 inappropriate, 1 uncertain, and 36 nonclassifiable. Inappropriate and nonclassifiable studies were more commonly TTE than TEE (P < .001). Inappropriate studies were more common in outpatients than inpatients (P < .001). Nonclassifiable cases included assessment after radiofrequency ablation (33.3{\%}) and preoperative evaluation (8.3{\%}). Disagreement between observers in selection of the criterion was present in 30.8{\%}. Conclusions: Although the study was conducted retrospectively, only 4.7{\%} of classifiable studies were inappropriate. The reproducibility of classification was moderate, and 6.8{\%} of studies were not classifiable. Areas for improvement of the criteria were identified.",
keywords = "Appropriateness, Echocardiography, Imaging, Transesophageal echocardiography, Transthoracic echocardiography",
author = "Aggarwal, {Niti R.} and Punsak Wuthiwaropas and Karon, {Barry L.} and Miller, {Fletcher A Jr.} and Patricia Pellikka",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.echo.2009.11.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "267--274",
journal = "Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography",
issn = "0894-7317",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of the Appropriateness Criteria for Echocardiography in an Academic Medical Center

AU - Aggarwal, Niti R.

AU - Wuthiwaropas, Punsak

AU - Karon, Barry L.

AU - Miller, Fletcher A Jr.

AU - Pellikka, Patricia

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Background: The authors examined the feasibility of application of the American College of Cardiology Foundation's appropriateness criteria for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at a large tertiary care practice. Methods: Indications for consecutive TTE and TEE were determined by chart review and classified according to the guidelines as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain or, for situations not addressed in the document, nonclassifiable. Results: Of the 529 studies reviewed, 469 were appropriate, 23 inappropriate, 1 uncertain, and 36 nonclassifiable. Inappropriate and nonclassifiable studies were more commonly TTE than TEE (P < .001). Inappropriate studies were more common in outpatients than inpatients (P < .001). Nonclassifiable cases included assessment after radiofrequency ablation (33.3%) and preoperative evaluation (8.3%). Disagreement between observers in selection of the criterion was present in 30.8%. Conclusions: Although the study was conducted retrospectively, only 4.7% of classifiable studies were inappropriate. The reproducibility of classification was moderate, and 6.8% of studies were not classifiable. Areas for improvement of the criteria were identified.

AB - Background: The authors examined the feasibility of application of the American College of Cardiology Foundation's appropriateness criteria for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at a large tertiary care practice. Methods: Indications for consecutive TTE and TEE were determined by chart review and classified according to the guidelines as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain or, for situations not addressed in the document, nonclassifiable. Results: Of the 529 studies reviewed, 469 were appropriate, 23 inappropriate, 1 uncertain, and 36 nonclassifiable. Inappropriate and nonclassifiable studies were more commonly TTE than TEE (P < .001). Inappropriate studies were more common in outpatients than inpatients (P < .001). Nonclassifiable cases included assessment after radiofrequency ablation (33.3%) and preoperative evaluation (8.3%). Disagreement between observers in selection of the criterion was present in 30.8%. Conclusions: Although the study was conducted retrospectively, only 4.7% of classifiable studies were inappropriate. The reproducibility of classification was moderate, and 6.8% of studies were not classifiable. Areas for improvement of the criteria were identified.

KW - Appropriateness

KW - Echocardiography

KW - Imaging

KW - Transesophageal echocardiography

KW - Transthoracic echocardiography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649233812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649233812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.echo.2009.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.echo.2009.11.005

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 267

EP - 274

JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

SN - 0894-7317

IS - 3

ER -