Antidepressant medication management and health plan employer data information set (HEDIS) criteria: Reasons for nonadherence

Kenneth A. Kobak, L. V H Taylor, David J Katzelnick, Nevin Olson, Peter Clagnaz, Henry J. Henk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: While nationwide data have found that many patients do not meet the National Committee for Quality Assurance uniform standards for successful antidepressant treatment, reasons for this failure are not well understood. We examined the reasons for this failure through a systematic chart review. Method: A chart review was conducted on a random sample of 249 health maintenance organization patients who failed 1 or more of the 3 Health Plan Employer Data Information Set criteria (i.e., 3 follow-up visits or adequate duration of acute or continuation phase treatment). Results: The most common reason for visits failure (N = 192) was that the patient restarted a previously prescribed successful antidepressant (N = 30, 16%). In 23 patients (12%), the patient had a visit with the prescribing provider, but mental health was not coded or documented in the case notes. Twenty-one percent (N = 40) were misclassified as not having 3 visits. The most common reasons for misclassification were mental health was discussed but not coded (N = 16, 8%) and wrong start dates due to use of medication samples (N = 10, 5%). Patient nonadherence was the most common reason for failure to meet adequate acute (N = 109) and continuation (N = 99) phase duration of treatment (13% and 24%, respectively); only 9% stopped taking medication in the acute phase due to side effects. Twenty-five percent of patients had told their doctor they were taking their medication while the pharmacy database found they were not. Conclusion: A large discrepancy between patients' actual and reported compliance was found and may in part account for physicians' inability to detect and thus address this issue. Patients' restarting a previous medication is common and warrants discussion regarding differential need for visit frequency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)727-732
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychiatry
Volume63
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Antidepressive Agents
Health
Mental Health
Health Maintenance Organizations
Datasets
Patient Compliance
Treatment Failure
Compliance
Databases
Physicians
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Antidepressant medication management and health plan employer data information set (HEDIS) criteria : Reasons for nonadherence. / Kobak, Kenneth A.; Taylor, L. V H; Katzelnick, David J; Olson, Nevin; Clagnaz, Peter; Henk, Henry J.

In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 63, No. 8, 08.2002, p. 727-732.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kobak, Kenneth A. ; Taylor, L. V H ; Katzelnick, David J ; Olson, Nevin ; Clagnaz, Peter ; Henk, Henry J. / Antidepressant medication management and health plan employer data information set (HEDIS) criteria : Reasons for nonadherence. In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2002 ; Vol. 63, No. 8. pp. 727-732.
@article{75ffb9ea201d411c93f3655bd42120b7,
title = "Antidepressant medication management and health plan employer data information set (HEDIS) criteria: Reasons for nonadherence",
abstract = "Background: While nationwide data have found that many patients do not meet the National Committee for Quality Assurance uniform standards for successful antidepressant treatment, reasons for this failure are not well understood. We examined the reasons for this failure through a systematic chart review. Method: A chart review was conducted on a random sample of 249 health maintenance organization patients who failed 1 or more of the 3 Health Plan Employer Data Information Set criteria (i.e., 3 follow-up visits or adequate duration of acute or continuation phase treatment). Results: The most common reason for visits failure (N = 192) was that the patient restarted a previously prescribed successful antidepressant (N = 30, 16{\%}). In 23 patients (12{\%}), the patient had a visit with the prescribing provider, but mental health was not coded or documented in the case notes. Twenty-one percent (N = 40) were misclassified as not having 3 visits. The most common reasons for misclassification were mental health was discussed but not coded (N = 16, 8{\%}) and wrong start dates due to use of medication samples (N = 10, 5{\%}). Patient nonadherence was the most common reason for failure to meet adequate acute (N = 109) and continuation (N = 99) phase duration of treatment (13{\%} and 24{\%}, respectively); only 9{\%} stopped taking medication in the acute phase due to side effects. Twenty-five percent of patients had told their doctor they were taking their medication while the pharmacy database found they were not. Conclusion: A large discrepancy between patients' actual and reported compliance was found and may in part account for physicians' inability to detect and thus address this issue. Patients' restarting a previous medication is common and warrants discussion regarding differential need for visit frequency.",
author = "Kobak, {Kenneth A.} and Taylor, {L. V H} and Katzelnick, {David J} and Nevin Olson and Peter Clagnaz and Henk, {Henry J.}",
year = "2002",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "727--732",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Psychiatry",
issn = "0160-6689",
publisher = "Physicians Postgraduate Press Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antidepressant medication management and health plan employer data information set (HEDIS) criteria

T2 - Reasons for nonadherence

AU - Kobak, Kenneth A.

AU - Taylor, L. V H

AU - Katzelnick, David J

AU - Olson, Nevin

AU - Clagnaz, Peter

AU - Henk, Henry J.

PY - 2002/8

Y1 - 2002/8

N2 - Background: While nationwide data have found that many patients do not meet the National Committee for Quality Assurance uniform standards for successful antidepressant treatment, reasons for this failure are not well understood. We examined the reasons for this failure through a systematic chart review. Method: A chart review was conducted on a random sample of 249 health maintenance organization patients who failed 1 or more of the 3 Health Plan Employer Data Information Set criteria (i.e., 3 follow-up visits or adequate duration of acute or continuation phase treatment). Results: The most common reason for visits failure (N = 192) was that the patient restarted a previously prescribed successful antidepressant (N = 30, 16%). In 23 patients (12%), the patient had a visit with the prescribing provider, but mental health was not coded or documented in the case notes. Twenty-one percent (N = 40) were misclassified as not having 3 visits. The most common reasons for misclassification were mental health was discussed but not coded (N = 16, 8%) and wrong start dates due to use of medication samples (N = 10, 5%). Patient nonadherence was the most common reason for failure to meet adequate acute (N = 109) and continuation (N = 99) phase duration of treatment (13% and 24%, respectively); only 9% stopped taking medication in the acute phase due to side effects. Twenty-five percent of patients had told their doctor they were taking their medication while the pharmacy database found they were not. Conclusion: A large discrepancy between patients' actual and reported compliance was found and may in part account for physicians' inability to detect and thus address this issue. Patients' restarting a previous medication is common and warrants discussion regarding differential need for visit frequency.

AB - Background: While nationwide data have found that many patients do not meet the National Committee for Quality Assurance uniform standards for successful antidepressant treatment, reasons for this failure are not well understood. We examined the reasons for this failure through a systematic chart review. Method: A chart review was conducted on a random sample of 249 health maintenance organization patients who failed 1 or more of the 3 Health Plan Employer Data Information Set criteria (i.e., 3 follow-up visits or adequate duration of acute or continuation phase treatment). Results: The most common reason for visits failure (N = 192) was that the patient restarted a previously prescribed successful antidepressant (N = 30, 16%). In 23 patients (12%), the patient had a visit with the prescribing provider, but mental health was not coded or documented in the case notes. Twenty-one percent (N = 40) were misclassified as not having 3 visits. The most common reasons for misclassification were mental health was discussed but not coded (N = 16, 8%) and wrong start dates due to use of medication samples (N = 10, 5%). Patient nonadherence was the most common reason for failure to meet adequate acute (N = 109) and continuation (N = 99) phase duration of treatment (13% and 24%, respectively); only 9% stopped taking medication in the acute phase due to side effects. Twenty-five percent of patients had told their doctor they were taking their medication while the pharmacy database found they were not. Conclusion: A large discrepancy between patients' actual and reported compliance was found and may in part account for physicians' inability to detect and thus address this issue. Patients' restarting a previous medication is common and warrants discussion regarding differential need for visit frequency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036674008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036674008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12197454

AN - SCOPUS:0036674008

VL - 63

SP - 727

EP - 732

JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

SN - 0160-6689

IS - 8

ER -