Answering diabetic patients' questions using expert-vetted online resources: A case study

Yuqun Zeng, Xusheng Liu, Liwei Wang, Hongfang D Liu, Yanshan Wang

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

As an increasing number of patients seek medical information online, it is crucial to bring expert-vetted information to patients. Multiple expert-vetted online resources exist for their accuracy and authority of medical knowledge. However, it is not clear which resource is better in meeting the information needs of the patients. Utilizing a collection of questions raised by patients with diabetes retrieved from an online forum, we manually evaluated three widely used expert-vetted online resources (WebMD, MedlinePlus, and UpToDate) in terms of content coverage and time spent to find answers. The results indicated that WebMD had slightly better content coverage with less time spent in finding answers. Leveraging the Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and a clinical terminology resource, the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), we demonstrated that WebMD had a higher mapping rate of clinical concepts comparing to other resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2016
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages525-528
Number of pages4
ISBN (Electronic)9781509016105
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 17 2017
Event2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2016 - Shenzhen, China
Duration: Dec 15 2016Dec 18 2016

Other

Other2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2016
CountryChina
CityShenzhen
Period12/15/1612/18/16

Fingerprint

Terminology
Medical problems
Processing
MedlinePlus
Unified Medical Language System
Natural Language Processing

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • Expert-vetted online resources
  • Natural language processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Biochemistry, medical
  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Medicine
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Zeng, Y., Liu, X., Wang, L., Liu, H. D., & Wang, Y. (2017). Answering diabetic patients' questions using expert-vetted online resources: A case study. In Proceedings - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2016 (pp. 525-528). [7822575] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822575

Answering diabetic patients' questions using expert-vetted online resources : A case study. / Zeng, Yuqun; Liu, Xusheng; Wang, Liwei; Liu, Hongfang D; Wang, Yanshan.

Proceedings - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2016. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017. p. 525-528 7822575.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Zeng, Y, Liu, X, Wang, L, Liu, HD & Wang, Y 2017, Answering diabetic patients' questions using expert-vetted online resources: A case study. in Proceedings - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2016., 7822575, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 525-528, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2016, Shenzhen, China, 12/15/16. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822575
Zeng Y, Liu X, Wang L, Liu HD, Wang Y. Answering diabetic patients' questions using expert-vetted online resources: A case study. In Proceedings - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2016. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2017. p. 525-528. 7822575 https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822575
Zeng, Yuqun ; Liu, Xusheng ; Wang, Liwei ; Liu, Hongfang D ; Wang, Yanshan. / Answering diabetic patients' questions using expert-vetted online resources : A case study. Proceedings - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2016. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017. pp. 525-528
@inproceedings{dfb2d692b13a436da60d6b181beb8d37,
title = "Answering diabetic patients' questions using expert-vetted online resources: A case study",
abstract = "As an increasing number of patients seek medical information online, it is crucial to bring expert-vetted information to patients. Multiple expert-vetted online resources exist for their accuracy and authority of medical knowledge. However, it is not clear which resource is better in meeting the information needs of the patients. Utilizing a collection of questions raised by patients with diabetes retrieved from an online forum, we manually evaluated three widely used expert-vetted online resources (WebMD, MedlinePlus, and UpToDate) in terms of content coverage and time spent to find answers. The results indicated that WebMD had slightly better content coverage with less time spent in finding answers. Leveraging the Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and a clinical terminology resource, the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), we demonstrated that WebMD had a higher mapping rate of clinical concepts comparing to other resources.",
keywords = "Diabetes, Expert-vetted online resources, Natural language processing",
author = "Yuqun Zeng and Xusheng Liu and Liwei Wang and Liu, {Hongfang D} and Yanshan Wang",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822575",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "525--528",
booktitle = "Proceedings - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2016",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Answering diabetic patients' questions using expert-vetted online resources

T2 - A case study

AU - Zeng, Yuqun

AU - Liu, Xusheng

AU - Wang, Liwei

AU - Liu, Hongfang D

AU - Wang, Yanshan

PY - 2017/1/17

Y1 - 2017/1/17

N2 - As an increasing number of patients seek medical information online, it is crucial to bring expert-vetted information to patients. Multiple expert-vetted online resources exist for their accuracy and authority of medical knowledge. However, it is not clear which resource is better in meeting the information needs of the patients. Utilizing a collection of questions raised by patients with diabetes retrieved from an online forum, we manually evaluated three widely used expert-vetted online resources (WebMD, MedlinePlus, and UpToDate) in terms of content coverage and time spent to find answers. The results indicated that WebMD had slightly better content coverage with less time spent in finding answers. Leveraging the Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and a clinical terminology resource, the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), we demonstrated that WebMD had a higher mapping rate of clinical concepts comparing to other resources.

AB - As an increasing number of patients seek medical information online, it is crucial to bring expert-vetted information to patients. Multiple expert-vetted online resources exist for their accuracy and authority of medical knowledge. However, it is not clear which resource is better in meeting the information needs of the patients. Utilizing a collection of questions raised by patients with diabetes retrieved from an online forum, we manually evaluated three widely used expert-vetted online resources (WebMD, MedlinePlus, and UpToDate) in terms of content coverage and time spent to find answers. The results indicated that WebMD had slightly better content coverage with less time spent in finding answers. Leveraging the Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and a clinical terminology resource, the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), we demonstrated that WebMD had a higher mapping rate of clinical concepts comparing to other resources.

KW - Diabetes

KW - Expert-vetted online resources

KW - Natural language processing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013254127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013254127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822575

DO - 10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822575

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85013254127

SP - 525

EP - 528

BT - Proceedings - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2016

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

ER -