Angioplastia y stenting de la estenosis carotídea. ¿Alternativa terapéutica o posibilidad técnica?

Translated title of the contribution: Angioplasty and stenting of carotid stenosis. Therapeutic alternative or technical possibility?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. Review the current knowledge on the use of angioplasty and stenting (A/S) for the treatment of carotid stenosis with emphasis on proposed indications. Development. The standard treatment for carotid stenosis is carotid endarterectomy (CE). However, excessive surgical risk and/or technical difficulty occasionally impose limitations on the surgical approach. Therefore, the option of percutaneous treatment with A/S becomes an appealing alternative. A/S techniques are constantly improved but there is very little prospective data supporting its value at present. The reported complication rates appear comparable to those of CE. Indications for A/S of the carotid artery are not fully delineated yet. We believe that adequate candidates for carotid A/S must have symptomatic high-degree carotid stenosis and at least one of the following situations: unstable coronary disease, severe systemic disease, surgically inaccessible carotid lesion (including some cases of carotid stenosis secondary to neck radiation), contralateral carotid occlusion, or recurrent stenosis after prior CE. Conclusions. A/S represents a promising alternative to CE in the treatment of carotid stenosis. However, in the absence of prospective comparative trials, A/S should be currently reserved exclusively for those patients in whom surgery is prohibited by very high surgical risk or technical inaccessibility. A/S of the carotid artery should only be performed by operators with ample expertise in the field.

Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)270-275
Number of pages6
JournalRevista de Neurologia
Volume32
Issue number3
StatePublished - Feb 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Carotid Stenosis
Angioplasty
Carotid Endarterectomy
Therapeutics
Carotid Arteries
Coronary Disease
Pathologic Constriction
Neck
Radiation

Keywords

  • Angioplasty
  • Carotid endarterectomy
  • Carotid stenosis
  • Complications
  • Indications
  • Stenting
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Angioplastia y stenting de la estenosis carotídea. ¿Alternativa terapéutica o posibilidad técnica? / Forteza, A.; Rabinstein, Alejandro.

In: Revista de Neurologia, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.02.2001, p. 270-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{047eba73a2d74a48b0df7f0d55c96da3,
title = "Angioplastia y stenting de la estenosis carot{\'i}dea. ¿Alternativa terap{\'e}utica o posibilidad t{\'e}cnica?",
abstract = "Objective. Review the current knowledge on the use of angioplasty and stenting (A/S) for the treatment of carotid stenosis with emphasis on proposed indications. Development. The standard treatment for carotid stenosis is carotid endarterectomy (CE). However, excessive surgical risk and/or technical difficulty occasionally impose limitations on the surgical approach. Therefore, the option of percutaneous treatment with A/S becomes an appealing alternative. A/S techniques are constantly improved but there is very little prospective data supporting its value at present. The reported complication rates appear comparable to those of CE. Indications for A/S of the carotid artery are not fully delineated yet. We believe that adequate candidates for carotid A/S must have symptomatic high-degree carotid stenosis and at least one of the following situations: unstable coronary disease, severe systemic disease, surgically inaccessible carotid lesion (including some cases of carotid stenosis secondary to neck radiation), contralateral carotid occlusion, or recurrent stenosis after prior CE. Conclusions. A/S represents a promising alternative to CE in the treatment of carotid stenosis. However, in the absence of prospective comparative trials, A/S should be currently reserved exclusively for those patients in whom surgery is prohibited by very high surgical risk or technical inaccessibility. A/S of the carotid artery should only be performed by operators with ample expertise in the field.",
keywords = "Angioplasty, Carotid endarterectomy, Carotid stenosis, Complications, Indications, Stenting, Treatment",
author = "A. Forteza and Alejandro Rabinstein",
year = "2001",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "32",
pages = "270--275",
journal = "Revista de Neurologia",
issn = "0210-0010",
publisher = "Revista de Neurologia",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Angioplastia y stenting de la estenosis carotídea. ¿Alternativa terapéutica o posibilidad técnica?

AU - Forteza, A.

AU - Rabinstein, Alejandro

PY - 2001/2/1

Y1 - 2001/2/1

N2 - Objective. Review the current knowledge on the use of angioplasty and stenting (A/S) for the treatment of carotid stenosis with emphasis on proposed indications. Development. The standard treatment for carotid stenosis is carotid endarterectomy (CE). However, excessive surgical risk and/or technical difficulty occasionally impose limitations on the surgical approach. Therefore, the option of percutaneous treatment with A/S becomes an appealing alternative. A/S techniques are constantly improved but there is very little prospective data supporting its value at present. The reported complication rates appear comparable to those of CE. Indications for A/S of the carotid artery are not fully delineated yet. We believe that adequate candidates for carotid A/S must have symptomatic high-degree carotid stenosis and at least one of the following situations: unstable coronary disease, severe systemic disease, surgically inaccessible carotid lesion (including some cases of carotid stenosis secondary to neck radiation), contralateral carotid occlusion, or recurrent stenosis after prior CE. Conclusions. A/S represents a promising alternative to CE in the treatment of carotid stenosis. However, in the absence of prospective comparative trials, A/S should be currently reserved exclusively for those patients in whom surgery is prohibited by very high surgical risk or technical inaccessibility. A/S of the carotid artery should only be performed by operators with ample expertise in the field.

AB - Objective. Review the current knowledge on the use of angioplasty and stenting (A/S) for the treatment of carotid stenosis with emphasis on proposed indications. Development. The standard treatment for carotid stenosis is carotid endarterectomy (CE). However, excessive surgical risk and/or technical difficulty occasionally impose limitations on the surgical approach. Therefore, the option of percutaneous treatment with A/S becomes an appealing alternative. A/S techniques are constantly improved but there is very little prospective data supporting its value at present. The reported complication rates appear comparable to those of CE. Indications for A/S of the carotid artery are not fully delineated yet. We believe that adequate candidates for carotid A/S must have symptomatic high-degree carotid stenosis and at least one of the following situations: unstable coronary disease, severe systemic disease, surgically inaccessible carotid lesion (including some cases of carotid stenosis secondary to neck radiation), contralateral carotid occlusion, or recurrent stenosis after prior CE. Conclusions. A/S represents a promising alternative to CE in the treatment of carotid stenosis. However, in the absence of prospective comparative trials, A/S should be currently reserved exclusively for those patients in whom surgery is prohibited by very high surgical risk or technical inaccessibility. A/S of the carotid artery should only be performed by operators with ample expertise in the field.

KW - Angioplasty

KW - Carotid endarterectomy

KW - Carotid stenosis

KW - Complications

KW - Indications

KW - Stenting

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035245109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035245109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 11310284

AN - SCOPUS:0035245109

VL - 32

SP - 270

EP - 275

JO - Revista de Neurologia

JF - Revista de Neurologia

SN - 0210-0010

IS - 3

ER -