Anatomy of energetic changes accompanying urea-induced protein denaturation

Matthew T Auton, L. M F Holthauzen, D. Wayne Bolen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

203 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because of its protein-denaturing ability, urea has played a pivotal role in the experimental and conceptual understanding of protein folding and unfolding. The measure of urea's ability to force a protein to unfold is given by the m value, an experimental quantity giving the free energy change for unfolding per molar urea. With the aid of Tanford's transfer model [Tanford C (1964) J Am Chem Soc 86:2050-2059], we use newly obtained group transfer free energies (GTFEs) of protein side-chain and backbone units from water to 1 M urea to account for the m value of urea, and the method reveals the anatomy of protein denaturation in terms of residue-level free energy contributions of groups newly exposed on denaturation. The GTFEs were obtained by accounting for solubility and activity coefficient ratios accompanying the transfer of glycine from water to 1 M urea. Contrary to the opinions of some researchers, the GTFEs show that urea does not denature proteins through favorable interactions with nonpolar side chains; what drives urea-induced protein unfolding is the large favorable interaction of urea with the peptide backbone. Although the m value is said to be proportional to surface area newly exposed on denaturation, only ≈25% of the area favorably contributes to unfolding (because of newly exposed backbone units), with ≈75% modestly opposing urea-induced denaturation (originating from side-chain exposure). Use of the transfer model and newly determined GTFEs achieves the long-sought goal of predicting urea-dependent cooperative protein unfolding energetics at the level of individual amino acid residues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15317-15322
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume104
Issue number39
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 25 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Protein Denaturation
Urea
Anatomy
Protein Unfolding
Energy Transfer
Proteins
Water
Protein Folding
Solubility
Glycine
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Activity coefficient
  • M value
  • Self-avoiding random coil
  • Transfer free energy
  • Transfer model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General
  • Genetics

Cite this

Anatomy of energetic changes accompanying urea-induced protein denaturation. / Auton, Matthew T; Holthauzen, L. M F; Bolen, D. Wayne.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 104, No. 39, 25.09.2007, p. 15317-15322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fde03fbade8548d5b6a6cdfd91dbd1e8,
title = "Anatomy of energetic changes accompanying urea-induced protein denaturation",
abstract = "Because of its protein-denaturing ability, urea has played a pivotal role in the experimental and conceptual understanding of protein folding and unfolding. The measure of urea's ability to force a protein to unfold is given by the m value, an experimental quantity giving the free energy change for unfolding per molar urea. With the aid of Tanford's transfer model [Tanford C (1964) J Am Chem Soc 86:2050-2059], we use newly obtained group transfer free energies (GTFEs) of protein side-chain and backbone units from water to 1 M urea to account for the m value of urea, and the method reveals the anatomy of protein denaturation in terms of residue-level free energy contributions of groups newly exposed on denaturation. The GTFEs were obtained by accounting for solubility and activity coefficient ratios accompanying the transfer of glycine from water to 1 M urea. Contrary to the opinions of some researchers, the GTFEs show that urea does not denature proteins through favorable interactions with nonpolar side chains; what drives urea-induced protein unfolding is the large favorable interaction of urea with the peptide backbone. Although the m value is said to be proportional to surface area newly exposed on denaturation, only ≈25{\%} of the area favorably contributes to unfolding (because of newly exposed backbone units), with ≈75{\%} modestly opposing urea-induced denaturation (originating from side-chain exposure). Use of the transfer model and newly determined GTFEs achieves the long-sought goal of predicting urea-dependent cooperative protein unfolding energetics at the level of individual amino acid residues.",
keywords = "Activity coefficient, M value, Self-avoiding random coil, Transfer free energy, Transfer model",
author = "Auton, {Matthew T} and Holthauzen, {L. M F} and Bolen, {D. Wayne}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.0706251104",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "15317--15322",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "39",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anatomy of energetic changes accompanying urea-induced protein denaturation

AU - Auton, Matthew T

AU - Holthauzen, L. M F

AU - Bolen, D. Wayne

PY - 2007/9/25

Y1 - 2007/9/25

N2 - Because of its protein-denaturing ability, urea has played a pivotal role in the experimental and conceptual understanding of protein folding and unfolding. The measure of urea's ability to force a protein to unfold is given by the m value, an experimental quantity giving the free energy change for unfolding per molar urea. With the aid of Tanford's transfer model [Tanford C (1964) J Am Chem Soc 86:2050-2059], we use newly obtained group transfer free energies (GTFEs) of protein side-chain and backbone units from water to 1 M urea to account for the m value of urea, and the method reveals the anatomy of protein denaturation in terms of residue-level free energy contributions of groups newly exposed on denaturation. The GTFEs were obtained by accounting for solubility and activity coefficient ratios accompanying the transfer of glycine from water to 1 M urea. Contrary to the opinions of some researchers, the GTFEs show that urea does not denature proteins through favorable interactions with nonpolar side chains; what drives urea-induced protein unfolding is the large favorable interaction of urea with the peptide backbone. Although the m value is said to be proportional to surface area newly exposed on denaturation, only ≈25% of the area favorably contributes to unfolding (because of newly exposed backbone units), with ≈75% modestly opposing urea-induced denaturation (originating from side-chain exposure). Use of the transfer model and newly determined GTFEs achieves the long-sought goal of predicting urea-dependent cooperative protein unfolding energetics at the level of individual amino acid residues.

AB - Because of its protein-denaturing ability, urea has played a pivotal role in the experimental and conceptual understanding of protein folding and unfolding. The measure of urea's ability to force a protein to unfold is given by the m value, an experimental quantity giving the free energy change for unfolding per molar urea. With the aid of Tanford's transfer model [Tanford C (1964) J Am Chem Soc 86:2050-2059], we use newly obtained group transfer free energies (GTFEs) of protein side-chain and backbone units from water to 1 M urea to account for the m value of urea, and the method reveals the anatomy of protein denaturation in terms of residue-level free energy contributions of groups newly exposed on denaturation. The GTFEs were obtained by accounting for solubility and activity coefficient ratios accompanying the transfer of glycine from water to 1 M urea. Contrary to the opinions of some researchers, the GTFEs show that urea does not denature proteins through favorable interactions with nonpolar side chains; what drives urea-induced protein unfolding is the large favorable interaction of urea with the peptide backbone. Although the m value is said to be proportional to surface area newly exposed on denaturation, only ≈25% of the area favorably contributes to unfolding (because of newly exposed backbone units), with ≈75% modestly opposing urea-induced denaturation (originating from side-chain exposure). Use of the transfer model and newly determined GTFEs achieves the long-sought goal of predicting urea-dependent cooperative protein unfolding energetics at the level of individual amino acid residues.

KW - Activity coefficient

KW - M value

KW - Self-avoiding random coil

KW - Transfer free energy

KW - Transfer model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34848916114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34848916114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.0706251104

DO - 10.1073/pnas.0706251104

M3 - Article

C2 - 17878304

AN - SCOPUS:34848916114

VL - 104

SP - 15317

EP - 15322

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 39

ER -