TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of the Changing Economics of US Hospital Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Programs
AU - Kumar, Vinayak
AU - Sandhu, Gurpreet S.
AU - Harper, Charles M.
AU - Ting, Henry H.
AU - Rihal, Charanjit S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Potential Competing Interests: Dr Sandhu has received research grants as the site principal investigator for the multi-center REPRISE 3 and SURTAVI clinical trials sponsored by Boston Scientific and Medtronic respectively. Dr Rihal has received research grants from Edwards Lifesciences , Medtronic , and Abbott Vascular ; and has been on steering committee with Edwards Lifesciences. This study has no input from any industry. The remaining authors report no competing interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - New technologies in medicine, even if they are promising medically, are often expensive and logistically difficult to implement at the hospital level. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a model technology that is revolutionary in treating aortic stenosis, but has been plagued with significant challenges with financial sustainability. In this article, a margin analysis at the hospital level was performed using literature data. A TAVR industry analysis was performed using Porter's Five Forces framework. The data indicate that TAVR is more expensive than surgical aortic valve replacement, although the cost of TAVR is declining with the use of an optimized minimalist protocol. The overall industry is growing as its clinical indications expand, and it will likely undergo significant reduction of costs when new valves enter the US market. As such, TAVR is a growing industry, with financial sustainability currently dependent on operational efficiency. A concluding list of specific program interventions is provided to help TAVR programs improve operational efficiency and clinical outcomes, as well as help decide whether to create, expand, or redirect funding for TAVR programs. Importantly, the frameworks used to analyze this rapidly evolving technology can be applied to other new technologies to determine financial sustainability.
AB - New technologies in medicine, even if they are promising medically, are often expensive and logistically difficult to implement at the hospital level. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a model technology that is revolutionary in treating aortic stenosis, but has been plagued with significant challenges with financial sustainability. In this article, a margin analysis at the hospital level was performed using literature data. A TAVR industry analysis was performed using Porter's Five Forces framework. The data indicate that TAVR is more expensive than surgical aortic valve replacement, although the cost of TAVR is declining with the use of an optimized minimalist protocol. The overall industry is growing as its clinical indications expand, and it will likely undergo significant reduction of costs when new valves enter the US market. As such, TAVR is a growing industry, with financial sustainability currently dependent on operational efficiency. A concluding list of specific program interventions is provided to help TAVR programs improve operational efficiency and clinical outcomes, as well as help decide whether to create, expand, or redirect funding for TAVR programs. Importantly, the frameworks used to analyze this rapidly evolving technology can be applied to other new technologies to determine financial sustainability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095827179&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095827179&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.012
DO - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.012
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33168158
AN - SCOPUS:85095827179
SN - 0025-6196
VL - 96
SP - 174
EP - 182
JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
IS - 1
ER -