Analysis of clinical outcomes of upper and lower extremity reconstructions in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma

Trishul Kapoor, Joseph Banuelos, Kian Adabi, Steven Lawrence Moran, Oscar J. Manrique

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Primary amputations have been the standard of treatment for extremity soft tissue sarcomas. However, over the last few decades, this mode of treatment has been increasingly replaced by limb-sparing procedures.1 Our goal is to report the clinical outcomes of upper and lower extremity reconstructions in patients with a history of soft-tissue sarcoma. Methods: A retrospective review of 178 patients with a history of soft-tissue sarcoma who underwent upper or lower extremity reconstructions was conducted. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, type of flap utilized, functional outcomes, and postoperative donor-/recipient-site complications (DSC/RSC) were analyzed. Variables were compared between free and pedicle flaps (FF or PF). Results: PF reconstructions had a higher rate of DSC (P < 0.044), whereas FF reconstructions had a higher rate of RSC (P < 0.03). Upper extremity reconstruction resulted in a mean QuickDASH score of 5.98 (SD 9.37) with no significant difference between PF and FF. Lower extremity reconstruction resulted in a mean score of 71.2 (SD 10.7) for PF and 71.3 (SD 5.1) for FF on the Lower Extremity Function Scale. Conclusion: Limb-preserving reconstruction with PF and FF is a reliable and safe option after sarcoma resection. In addition, long-term outcomes are promising and reassure the adequate functionality of the limb.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Sarcoma
Lower Extremity
Extremities
Free Tissue Flaps
Amputation
Upper Extremity
Therapeutics
Demography
Tissue Donors
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • limb reconstruction
  • patient outcomes
  • sarcoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

Analysis of clinical outcomes of upper and lower extremity reconstructions in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma. / Kapoor, Trishul; Banuelos, Joseph; Adabi, Kian; Moran, Steven Lawrence; Manrique, Oscar J.

In: Journal of Surgical Oncology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{542d0fe0c3b34fe4b5dc1445c973d181,
title = "Analysis of clinical outcomes of upper and lower extremity reconstructions in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: Primary amputations have been the standard of treatment for extremity soft tissue sarcomas. However, over the last few decades, this mode of treatment has been increasingly replaced by limb-sparing procedures.1 Our goal is to report the clinical outcomes of upper and lower extremity reconstructions in patients with a history of soft-tissue sarcoma. Methods: A retrospective review of 178 patients with a history of soft-tissue sarcoma who underwent upper or lower extremity reconstructions was conducted. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, type of flap utilized, functional outcomes, and postoperative donor-/recipient-site complications (DSC/RSC) were analyzed. Variables were compared between free and pedicle flaps (FF or PF). Results: PF reconstructions had a higher rate of DSC (P < 0.044), whereas FF reconstructions had a higher rate of RSC (P < 0.03). Upper extremity reconstruction resulted in a mean QuickDASH score of 5.98 (SD 9.37) with no significant difference between PF and FF. Lower extremity reconstruction resulted in a mean score of 71.2 (SD 10.7) for PF and 71.3 (SD 5.1) for FF on the Lower Extremity Function Scale. Conclusion: Limb-preserving reconstruction with PF and FF is a reliable and safe option after sarcoma resection. In addition, long-term outcomes are promising and reassure the adequate functionality of the limb.",
keywords = "limb reconstruction, patient outcomes, sarcoma",
author = "Trishul Kapoor and Joseph Banuelos and Kian Adabi and Moran, {Steven Lawrence} and Manrique, {Oscar J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jso.25201",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "0022-4790",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of clinical outcomes of upper and lower extremity reconstructions in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma

AU - Kapoor, Trishul

AU - Banuelos, Joseph

AU - Adabi, Kian

AU - Moran, Steven Lawrence

AU - Manrique, Oscar J.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background and Objectives: Primary amputations have been the standard of treatment for extremity soft tissue sarcomas. However, over the last few decades, this mode of treatment has been increasingly replaced by limb-sparing procedures.1 Our goal is to report the clinical outcomes of upper and lower extremity reconstructions in patients with a history of soft-tissue sarcoma. Methods: A retrospective review of 178 patients with a history of soft-tissue sarcoma who underwent upper or lower extremity reconstructions was conducted. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, type of flap utilized, functional outcomes, and postoperative donor-/recipient-site complications (DSC/RSC) were analyzed. Variables were compared between free and pedicle flaps (FF or PF). Results: PF reconstructions had a higher rate of DSC (P < 0.044), whereas FF reconstructions had a higher rate of RSC (P < 0.03). Upper extremity reconstruction resulted in a mean QuickDASH score of 5.98 (SD 9.37) with no significant difference between PF and FF. Lower extremity reconstruction resulted in a mean score of 71.2 (SD 10.7) for PF and 71.3 (SD 5.1) for FF on the Lower Extremity Function Scale. Conclusion: Limb-preserving reconstruction with PF and FF is a reliable and safe option after sarcoma resection. In addition, long-term outcomes are promising and reassure the adequate functionality of the limb.

AB - Background and Objectives: Primary amputations have been the standard of treatment for extremity soft tissue sarcomas. However, over the last few decades, this mode of treatment has been increasingly replaced by limb-sparing procedures.1 Our goal is to report the clinical outcomes of upper and lower extremity reconstructions in patients with a history of soft-tissue sarcoma. Methods: A retrospective review of 178 patients with a history of soft-tissue sarcoma who underwent upper or lower extremity reconstructions was conducted. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, type of flap utilized, functional outcomes, and postoperative donor-/recipient-site complications (DSC/RSC) were analyzed. Variables were compared between free and pedicle flaps (FF or PF). Results: PF reconstructions had a higher rate of DSC (P < 0.044), whereas FF reconstructions had a higher rate of RSC (P < 0.03). Upper extremity reconstruction resulted in a mean QuickDASH score of 5.98 (SD 9.37) with no significant difference between PF and FF. Lower extremity reconstruction resulted in a mean score of 71.2 (SD 10.7) for PF and 71.3 (SD 5.1) for FF on the Lower Extremity Function Scale. Conclusion: Limb-preserving reconstruction with PF and FF is a reliable and safe option after sarcoma resection. In addition, long-term outcomes are promising and reassure the adequate functionality of the limb.

KW - limb reconstruction

KW - patient outcomes

KW - sarcoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052961459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052961459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jso.25201

DO - 10.1002/jso.25201

M3 - Article

C2 - 30196551

AN - SCOPUS:85052961459

JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology

JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology

SN - 0022-4790

ER -