An exploratory pilot study of palliative medicine compared to anesthesia-pain consultation for pain in patients with cancer

Deirdre R. Pachman, Keith M. Swetz, William D. Mauck, Matthew J. Pingree, Bryan C. Hoelzer, Anita J. Haugland, Paul J. Novotny, Jeff A Sloan, Timothy J. Moynihan, Richard H. Rho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Oncologists often manage cancer-associated symptoms including pain. When symptoms are severe, anesthesia-pain medicine (APM) and/or palliative medicine (PM) can effectively treat symptoms. Nevertheless, symptom management may be suboptimal, leading to diminished quality of life (QOL). We assessed the value of PM vs. APM consultation in cancer patients referred for pain management alone. Patients referred to an APM-based Cancer Pain Clinic (CPC) over an 8-month period were evaluated by PM or APM based on the first available appointment. Symptoms and QOL were assessed by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and Linear Analog Self-Assessment at baseline and 4-6 weeks after initial encounter. Data were analyzed on an available-case basis. Sixty-two patients (37 PM, 25 APM) completed the initial survey, with 48 patients (31 PM, 17 APM) completing follow-up. Mean pain score improved from 7.97 to 5.47 in the PM group (P < 0.0001) and from 7.1 to 4.5 (P = 0.29) in the APM group. The PM group demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in 8/19 symptoms vs. 3/19 in the APM group and in 3/5 QOL parameters in the PM group vs. 1/5 in the APM group. Our small sample size weakens our power and ability to detect significant differences between the groups. Only one follow-up symptom-assessment point was obtained. PM consultation is as effective as APM in improving cancer pain but may be more effective with symptom management and improving QOL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-119
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Supportive Oncology
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Referral and Consultation
Anesthesia
Pain
Medicine
Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Palliative Medicine
Referred Pain
Pain Clinics
Aptitude
Symptom Assessment
Pain Management
Sample Size
Appointments and Schedules
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Pachman, D. R., Swetz, K. M., Mauck, W. D., Pingree, M. J., Hoelzer, B. C., Haugland, A. J., ... Rho, R. H. (2011). An exploratory pilot study of palliative medicine compared to anesthesia-pain consultation for pain in patients with cancer. Journal of Supportive Oncology, 9(3), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.01.006

An exploratory pilot study of palliative medicine compared to anesthesia-pain consultation for pain in patients with cancer. / Pachman, Deirdre R.; Swetz, Keith M.; Mauck, William D.; Pingree, Matthew J.; Hoelzer, Bryan C.; Haugland, Anita J.; Novotny, Paul J.; Sloan, Jeff A; Moynihan, Timothy J.; Rho, Richard H.

In: Journal of Supportive Oncology, Vol. 9, No. 3, 05.2011, p. 113-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pachman, DR, Swetz, KM, Mauck, WD, Pingree, MJ, Hoelzer, BC, Haugland, AJ, Novotny, PJ, Sloan, JA, Moynihan, TJ & Rho, RH 2011, 'An exploratory pilot study of palliative medicine compared to anesthesia-pain consultation for pain in patients with cancer', Journal of Supportive Oncology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2011.01.006
Pachman, Deirdre R. ; Swetz, Keith M. ; Mauck, William D. ; Pingree, Matthew J. ; Hoelzer, Bryan C. ; Haugland, Anita J. ; Novotny, Paul J. ; Sloan, Jeff A ; Moynihan, Timothy J. ; Rho, Richard H. / An exploratory pilot study of palliative medicine compared to anesthesia-pain consultation for pain in patients with cancer. In: Journal of Supportive Oncology. 2011 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 113-119.
@article{37c9928779a54c3d9b543b54c1e6ce16,
title = "An exploratory pilot study of palliative medicine compared to anesthesia-pain consultation for pain in patients with cancer",
abstract = "Oncologists often manage cancer-associated symptoms including pain. When symptoms are severe, anesthesia-pain medicine (APM) and/or palliative medicine (PM) can effectively treat symptoms. Nevertheless, symptom management may be suboptimal, leading to diminished quality of life (QOL). We assessed the value of PM vs. APM consultation in cancer patients referred for pain management alone. Patients referred to an APM-based Cancer Pain Clinic (CPC) over an 8-month period were evaluated by PM or APM based on the first available appointment. Symptoms and QOL were assessed by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and Linear Analog Self-Assessment at baseline and 4-6 weeks after initial encounter. Data were analyzed on an available-case basis. Sixty-two patients (37 PM, 25 APM) completed the initial survey, with 48 patients (31 PM, 17 APM) completing follow-up. Mean pain score improved from 7.97 to 5.47 in the PM group (P < 0.0001) and from 7.1 to 4.5 (P = 0.29) in the APM group. The PM group demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in 8/19 symptoms vs. 3/19 in the APM group and in 3/5 QOL parameters in the PM group vs. 1/5 in the APM group. Our small sample size weakens our power and ability to detect significant differences between the groups. Only one follow-up symptom-assessment point was obtained. PM consultation is as effective as APM in improving cancer pain but may be more effective with symptom management and improving QOL.",
author = "Pachman, {Deirdre R.} and Swetz, {Keith M.} and Mauck, {William D.} and Pingree, {Matthew J.} and Hoelzer, {Bryan C.} and Haugland, {Anita J.} and Novotny, {Paul J.} and Sloan, {Jeff A} and Moynihan, {Timothy J.} and Rho, {Richard H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.suponc.2011.01.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "113--119",
journal = "Journal of Supportive Oncology",
issn = "1544-6794",
publisher = "Biolink Communications, Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An exploratory pilot study of palliative medicine compared to anesthesia-pain consultation for pain in patients with cancer

AU - Pachman, Deirdre R.

AU - Swetz, Keith M.

AU - Mauck, William D.

AU - Pingree, Matthew J.

AU - Hoelzer, Bryan C.

AU - Haugland, Anita J.

AU - Novotny, Paul J.

AU - Sloan, Jeff A

AU - Moynihan, Timothy J.

AU - Rho, Richard H.

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Oncologists often manage cancer-associated symptoms including pain. When symptoms are severe, anesthesia-pain medicine (APM) and/or palliative medicine (PM) can effectively treat symptoms. Nevertheless, symptom management may be suboptimal, leading to diminished quality of life (QOL). We assessed the value of PM vs. APM consultation in cancer patients referred for pain management alone. Patients referred to an APM-based Cancer Pain Clinic (CPC) over an 8-month period were evaluated by PM or APM based on the first available appointment. Symptoms and QOL were assessed by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and Linear Analog Self-Assessment at baseline and 4-6 weeks after initial encounter. Data were analyzed on an available-case basis. Sixty-two patients (37 PM, 25 APM) completed the initial survey, with 48 patients (31 PM, 17 APM) completing follow-up. Mean pain score improved from 7.97 to 5.47 in the PM group (P < 0.0001) and from 7.1 to 4.5 (P = 0.29) in the APM group. The PM group demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in 8/19 symptoms vs. 3/19 in the APM group and in 3/5 QOL parameters in the PM group vs. 1/5 in the APM group. Our small sample size weakens our power and ability to detect significant differences between the groups. Only one follow-up symptom-assessment point was obtained. PM consultation is as effective as APM in improving cancer pain but may be more effective with symptom management and improving QOL.

AB - Oncologists often manage cancer-associated symptoms including pain. When symptoms are severe, anesthesia-pain medicine (APM) and/or palliative medicine (PM) can effectively treat symptoms. Nevertheless, symptom management may be suboptimal, leading to diminished quality of life (QOL). We assessed the value of PM vs. APM consultation in cancer patients referred for pain management alone. Patients referred to an APM-based Cancer Pain Clinic (CPC) over an 8-month period were evaluated by PM or APM based on the first available appointment. Symptoms and QOL were assessed by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and Linear Analog Self-Assessment at baseline and 4-6 weeks after initial encounter. Data were analyzed on an available-case basis. Sixty-two patients (37 PM, 25 APM) completed the initial survey, with 48 patients (31 PM, 17 APM) completing follow-up. Mean pain score improved from 7.97 to 5.47 in the PM group (P < 0.0001) and from 7.1 to 4.5 (P = 0.29) in the APM group. The PM group demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in 8/19 symptoms vs. 3/19 in the APM group and in 3/5 QOL parameters in the PM group vs. 1/5 in the APM group. Our small sample size weakens our power and ability to detect significant differences between the groups. Only one follow-up symptom-assessment point was obtained. PM consultation is as effective as APM in improving cancer pain but may be more effective with symptom management and improving QOL.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960122340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960122340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.suponc.2011.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.suponc.2011.01.006

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 113

EP - 119

JO - Journal of Supportive Oncology

JF - Journal of Supportive Oncology

SN - 1544-6794

IS - 3

ER -