An evaluation of the signal and noise characteristics of four CCD-based film digitizers

N. J. Hangiandreou, T. J. O'Connor, J. P. Felmlee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Film digitizers are common devices in radiology departments involved with picture archive and communication systems (PACS) and teleradiology. In this paper, we studied the performance of film digitizers based on charge- coupled device detectors (CCD digitizers), and compared this with the performance of a laser digitizer (the de facto standard). Our focus was on the assessment of signal, noise and useful optical density range performance. A function (L*ΔD) derived from the Rose model was used to evaluate these parameters in absolute terms, based their predicted ability to detect objects of specific size and optical density difference with respect to background. We studied CCD digitizers from four different vendors and found that none was able to reliably operate up to the maximum density of 3.0 required to digitize plain radiographs, while the laser digitizer was capable of this task. Our analysis also indicated that two of the four CCD digitizers were adequate for digitizing laser-printed cross-sectional images in certain cases. Finally, our analysis indicated that digitization of SMPTE pattern films along with visual assessment of the 5% and 95% contrast patches was not sufficient for determining the utility of film digitizers for clinical tasks. Computation of the L*ΔD function provides a useful means of assessing the performance of film digitizers (e.g., for acceptance testing and quality control), and this technique may be adaptable for evaluation of other digital imaging modalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2020-2026
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Physics
Volume25
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1998

Fingerprint

Lasers
Teleradiology
Equipment and Supplies
Radiology
Quality Control
Noise

Keywords

  • CCD film digitizers
  • Laser film digitizers
  • Quality control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

An evaluation of the signal and noise characteristics of four CCD-based film digitizers. / Hangiandreou, N. J.; O'Connor, T. J.; Felmlee, J. P.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 25, No. 10, 10.1998, p. 2020-2026.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hangiandreou, N. J. ; O'Connor, T. J. ; Felmlee, J. P. / An evaluation of the signal and noise characteristics of four CCD-based film digitizers. In: Medical Physics. 1998 ; Vol. 25, No. 10. pp. 2020-2026.
@article{746eebcf8df14debac84eb51d2b4a27c,
title = "An evaluation of the signal and noise characteristics of four CCD-based film digitizers",
abstract = "Film digitizers are common devices in radiology departments involved with picture archive and communication systems (PACS) and teleradiology. In this paper, we studied the performance of film digitizers based on charge- coupled device detectors (CCD digitizers), and compared this with the performance of a laser digitizer (the de facto standard). Our focus was on the assessment of signal, noise and useful optical density range performance. A function (L*ΔD) derived from the Rose model was used to evaluate these parameters in absolute terms, based their predicted ability to detect objects of specific size and optical density difference with respect to background. We studied CCD digitizers from four different vendors and found that none was able to reliably operate up to the maximum density of 3.0 required to digitize plain radiographs, while the laser digitizer was capable of this task. Our analysis also indicated that two of the four CCD digitizers were adequate for digitizing laser-printed cross-sectional images in certain cases. Finally, our analysis indicated that digitization of SMPTE pattern films along with visual assessment of the 5{\%} and 95{\%} contrast patches was not sufficient for determining the utility of film digitizers for clinical tasks. Computation of the L*ΔD function provides a useful means of assessing the performance of film digitizers (e.g., for acceptance testing and quality control), and this technique may be adaptable for evaluation of other digital imaging modalities.",
keywords = "CCD film digitizers, Laser film digitizers, Quality control",
author = "Hangiandreou, {N. J.} and O'Connor, {T. J.} and Felmlee, {J. P.}",
year = "1998",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1118/1.598390",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "2020--2026",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of the signal and noise characteristics of four CCD-based film digitizers

AU - Hangiandreou, N. J.

AU - O'Connor, T. J.

AU - Felmlee, J. P.

PY - 1998/10

Y1 - 1998/10

N2 - Film digitizers are common devices in radiology departments involved with picture archive and communication systems (PACS) and teleradiology. In this paper, we studied the performance of film digitizers based on charge- coupled device detectors (CCD digitizers), and compared this with the performance of a laser digitizer (the de facto standard). Our focus was on the assessment of signal, noise and useful optical density range performance. A function (L*ΔD) derived from the Rose model was used to evaluate these parameters in absolute terms, based their predicted ability to detect objects of specific size and optical density difference with respect to background. We studied CCD digitizers from four different vendors and found that none was able to reliably operate up to the maximum density of 3.0 required to digitize plain radiographs, while the laser digitizer was capable of this task. Our analysis also indicated that two of the four CCD digitizers were adequate for digitizing laser-printed cross-sectional images in certain cases. Finally, our analysis indicated that digitization of SMPTE pattern films along with visual assessment of the 5% and 95% contrast patches was not sufficient for determining the utility of film digitizers for clinical tasks. Computation of the L*ΔD function provides a useful means of assessing the performance of film digitizers (e.g., for acceptance testing and quality control), and this technique may be adaptable for evaluation of other digital imaging modalities.

AB - Film digitizers are common devices in radiology departments involved with picture archive and communication systems (PACS) and teleradiology. In this paper, we studied the performance of film digitizers based on charge- coupled device detectors (CCD digitizers), and compared this with the performance of a laser digitizer (the de facto standard). Our focus was on the assessment of signal, noise and useful optical density range performance. A function (L*ΔD) derived from the Rose model was used to evaluate these parameters in absolute terms, based their predicted ability to detect objects of specific size and optical density difference with respect to background. We studied CCD digitizers from four different vendors and found that none was able to reliably operate up to the maximum density of 3.0 required to digitize plain radiographs, while the laser digitizer was capable of this task. Our analysis also indicated that two of the four CCD digitizers were adequate for digitizing laser-printed cross-sectional images in certain cases. Finally, our analysis indicated that digitization of SMPTE pattern films along with visual assessment of the 5% and 95% contrast patches was not sufficient for determining the utility of film digitizers for clinical tasks. Computation of the L*ΔD function provides a useful means of assessing the performance of film digitizers (e.g., for acceptance testing and quality control), and this technique may be adaptable for evaluation of other digital imaging modalities.

KW - CCD film digitizers

KW - Laser film digitizers

KW - Quality control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031789517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031789517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.598390

DO - 10.1118/1.598390

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 2020

EP - 2026

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 10

ER -