An automated analyzer provides clinically concordant results to manual back titration for quantitation of bicarbonate in pancreatic juice

Ning Zhong, Amy K. Saenger, Mark Topazian, Ferga C. Gleeson, Suresh T Chari, Jonathan E. Clain, Michael J. Levy, Elizabeth Rajan, Felicity T Enders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Secretin pancreatic function tests play an important role in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Back titration is the standard method for measurement of bicarbonate in pancreatic juice but is time consuming and manually performed. Use of an autoanalyzer for this purpose is not validated. METHODS: Bicarbonate concentrations in secretin-stimulated pancreatic juice specimens were quantitated by manual back titration, a clinical chemistry autoanalyzer (automated bicarbonate, Roche Cobas c501, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind), and a blood gas analyzer (calculated bicarbonate, GEM 3000, Instrumentation Laboratories, Bedford, Mass). Kappa statistic analysis, Bland-Altman analysis, and Lin concordance correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: Ninety specimens from 31 subjects were included. Using a bicarbonate concentration of 80 mEq/L as a cutoff value, there was poor agreement between back titration and calculated bicarbonate (κ = 0.188); however, only 1 specimen showed discrepancy between back titration and automated bicarbonate (κ = 0.977). The limit of agreement between the back titration and automated bicarbonate was -9.0 to + 8.3 mEq/L. The Lin concordance correlation coefficient between the 2 methods was 0.931 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is strong concordance between manual back titration and chemistry autoanalyzer methods for measurement of bicarbonate concentrations in pancreatic juice. Autoanalyzers may replace back titration for this purpose. Blood gas analyzers are unsuitable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)422-425
Number of pages4
JournalPancreas
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Pancreatic Juice
Bicarbonates
Secretin
Pancreatic Function Tests
Gases
Clinical Chemistry
Chronic Pancreatitis

Keywords

  • bicarbonate
  • chemistry
  • clinical
  • endoscopic ultrasound
  • pancreatic function tests
  • pancreatic juice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

An automated analyzer provides clinically concordant results to manual back titration for quantitation of bicarbonate in pancreatic juice. / Zhong, Ning; Saenger, Amy K.; Topazian, Mark; Gleeson, Ferga C.; Chari, Suresh T; Clain, Jonathan E.; Levy, Michael J.; Rajan, Elizabeth; Enders, Felicity T.

In: Pancreas, Vol. 40, No. 3, 04.2011, p. 422-425.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhong, Ning ; Saenger, Amy K. ; Topazian, Mark ; Gleeson, Ferga C. ; Chari, Suresh T ; Clain, Jonathan E. ; Levy, Michael J. ; Rajan, Elizabeth ; Enders, Felicity T. / An automated analyzer provides clinically concordant results to manual back titration for quantitation of bicarbonate in pancreatic juice. In: Pancreas. 2011 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 422-425.
@article{a0e741d40913419da36dd06cb73dcf08,
title = "An automated analyzer provides clinically concordant results to manual back titration for quantitation of bicarbonate in pancreatic juice",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Secretin pancreatic function tests play an important role in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Back titration is the standard method for measurement of bicarbonate in pancreatic juice but is time consuming and manually performed. Use of an autoanalyzer for this purpose is not validated. METHODS: Bicarbonate concentrations in secretin-stimulated pancreatic juice specimens were quantitated by manual back titration, a clinical chemistry autoanalyzer (automated bicarbonate, Roche Cobas c501, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind), and a blood gas analyzer (calculated bicarbonate, GEM 3000, Instrumentation Laboratories, Bedford, Mass). Kappa statistic analysis, Bland-Altman analysis, and Lin concordance correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: Ninety specimens from 31 subjects were included. Using a bicarbonate concentration of 80 mEq/L as a cutoff value, there was poor agreement between back titration and calculated bicarbonate (κ = 0.188); however, only 1 specimen showed discrepancy between back titration and automated bicarbonate (κ = 0.977). The limit of agreement between the back titration and automated bicarbonate was -9.0 to + 8.3 mEq/L. The Lin concordance correlation coefficient between the 2 methods was 0.931 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is strong concordance between manual back titration and chemistry autoanalyzer methods for measurement of bicarbonate concentrations in pancreatic juice. Autoanalyzers may replace back titration for this purpose. Blood gas analyzers are unsuitable.",
keywords = "bicarbonate, chemistry, clinical, endoscopic ultrasound, pancreatic function tests, pancreatic juice",
author = "Ning Zhong and Saenger, {Amy K.} and Mark Topazian and Gleeson, {Ferga C.} and Chari, {Suresh T} and Clain, {Jonathan E.} and Levy, {Michael J.} and Elizabeth Rajan and Enders, {Felicity T}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1097/MPA.0b013e318204e89a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "422--425",
journal = "Pancreas",
issn = "0885-3177",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An automated analyzer provides clinically concordant results to manual back titration for quantitation of bicarbonate in pancreatic juice

AU - Zhong, Ning

AU - Saenger, Amy K.

AU - Topazian, Mark

AU - Gleeson, Ferga C.

AU - Chari, Suresh T

AU - Clain, Jonathan E.

AU - Levy, Michael J.

AU - Rajan, Elizabeth

AU - Enders, Felicity T

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Secretin pancreatic function tests play an important role in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Back titration is the standard method for measurement of bicarbonate in pancreatic juice but is time consuming and manually performed. Use of an autoanalyzer for this purpose is not validated. METHODS: Bicarbonate concentrations in secretin-stimulated pancreatic juice specimens were quantitated by manual back titration, a clinical chemistry autoanalyzer (automated bicarbonate, Roche Cobas c501, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind), and a blood gas analyzer (calculated bicarbonate, GEM 3000, Instrumentation Laboratories, Bedford, Mass). Kappa statistic analysis, Bland-Altman analysis, and Lin concordance correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: Ninety specimens from 31 subjects were included. Using a bicarbonate concentration of 80 mEq/L as a cutoff value, there was poor agreement between back titration and calculated bicarbonate (κ = 0.188); however, only 1 specimen showed discrepancy between back titration and automated bicarbonate (κ = 0.977). The limit of agreement between the back titration and automated bicarbonate was -9.0 to + 8.3 mEq/L. The Lin concordance correlation coefficient between the 2 methods was 0.931 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is strong concordance between manual back titration and chemistry autoanalyzer methods for measurement of bicarbonate concentrations in pancreatic juice. Autoanalyzers may replace back titration for this purpose. Blood gas analyzers are unsuitable.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Secretin pancreatic function tests play an important role in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Back titration is the standard method for measurement of bicarbonate in pancreatic juice but is time consuming and manually performed. Use of an autoanalyzer for this purpose is not validated. METHODS: Bicarbonate concentrations in secretin-stimulated pancreatic juice specimens were quantitated by manual back titration, a clinical chemistry autoanalyzer (automated bicarbonate, Roche Cobas c501, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind), and a blood gas analyzer (calculated bicarbonate, GEM 3000, Instrumentation Laboratories, Bedford, Mass). Kappa statistic analysis, Bland-Altman analysis, and Lin concordance correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: Ninety specimens from 31 subjects were included. Using a bicarbonate concentration of 80 mEq/L as a cutoff value, there was poor agreement between back titration and calculated bicarbonate (κ = 0.188); however, only 1 specimen showed discrepancy between back titration and automated bicarbonate (κ = 0.977). The limit of agreement between the back titration and automated bicarbonate was -9.0 to + 8.3 mEq/L. The Lin concordance correlation coefficient between the 2 methods was 0.931 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is strong concordance between manual back titration and chemistry autoanalyzer methods for measurement of bicarbonate concentrations in pancreatic juice. Autoanalyzers may replace back titration for this purpose. Blood gas analyzers are unsuitable.

KW - bicarbonate

KW - chemistry

KW - clinical

KW - endoscopic ultrasound

KW - pancreatic function tests

KW - pancreatic juice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954414697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954414697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318204e89a

DO - 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318204e89a

M3 - Article

C2 - 21240033

AN - SCOPUS:79954414697

VL - 40

SP - 422

EP - 425

JO - Pancreas

JF - Pancreas

SN - 0885-3177

IS - 3

ER -