American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the respiratory health effects of asbestos

Daniel E. Banks, Runhua Shi, Jerry McLarty, Clayton T. Cowl, Dorsett Smith, Susan M. Tarlo, Feroza Daroowalla, John Balmes, Michael Baumann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of and criteria for the evaluation of asbestos-related disease impairment remains controversial after decades of research. Assessing agreement among experts who study pneumoconiosis, and diagnose and treat patients with asbestos-related respiratory conditions may be the first step in clarifying clinical and forensic/administrative issues associated with asbestos-related pulmonary conditions. Methods: We conducted a Delphi study, an iterative method of obtaining consensus among a group of experts. An expert panel was identified using an objective, nonbiased algorithm, based on the number of asbestos-related disease publications authored during the preceding 10-year period. Identified experts were invited to participate by accessing an Internet site. Each expert was presented statements developed by the authors regarding the diagnosis or treatment of asbestos-related disease; experts then ranked their degree of agreement or disagreement utilizing an 11-level modified Likert scale for each statement. Each expert was asked to justify their selection and to suggest references in support of their opinion. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and the interquartile range were used to define "consensus." The results of the collective Likert rankings, deidentified comments, and suggested references as well as the initial consensus results were then provided to the participating experts. Each panel member then ranked their extent of agreement with a modified statement for which consensus was not achieved. The process was repeated three times. Results: Consensus was achieved on all but 9 of 32 statements. Conclusions: Consensus was not achieved for nine statements. These statements may be topics for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1619-1627
Number of pages9
JournalChest
Volume135
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009

Fingerprint

Asbestos
Health
Delphi Technique
Pneumoconiosis
Nonparametric Statistics
Internet
Publications
Lung
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Banks, D. E., Shi, R., McLarty, J., Cowl, C. T., Smith, D., Tarlo, S. M., ... Baumann, M. (2009). American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the respiratory health effects of asbestos. Chest, 135(6), 1619-1627. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-1345

American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the respiratory health effects of asbestos. / Banks, Daniel E.; Shi, Runhua; McLarty, Jerry; Cowl, Clayton T.; Smith, Dorsett; Tarlo, Susan M.; Daroowalla, Feroza; Balmes, John; Baumann, Michael.

In: Chest, Vol. 135, No. 6, 01.06.2009, p. 1619-1627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Banks, DE, Shi, R, McLarty, J, Cowl, CT, Smith, D, Tarlo, SM, Daroowalla, F, Balmes, J & Baumann, M 2009, 'American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the respiratory health effects of asbestos', Chest, vol. 135, no. 6, pp. 1619-1627. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-1345
Banks, Daniel E. ; Shi, Runhua ; McLarty, Jerry ; Cowl, Clayton T. ; Smith, Dorsett ; Tarlo, Susan M. ; Daroowalla, Feroza ; Balmes, John ; Baumann, Michael. / American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the respiratory health effects of asbestos. In: Chest. 2009 ; Vol. 135, No. 6. pp. 1619-1627.
@article{325dabe7171f4fc9a304373ce3e037e5,
title = "American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the respiratory health effects of asbestos",
abstract = "Background: The diagnosis of and criteria for the evaluation of asbestos-related disease impairment remains controversial after decades of research. Assessing agreement among experts who study pneumoconiosis, and diagnose and treat patients with asbestos-related respiratory conditions may be the first step in clarifying clinical and forensic/administrative issues associated with asbestos-related pulmonary conditions. Methods: We conducted a Delphi study, an iterative method of obtaining consensus among a group of experts. An expert panel was identified using an objective, nonbiased algorithm, based on the number of asbestos-related disease publications authored during the preceding 10-year period. Identified experts were invited to participate by accessing an Internet site. Each expert was presented statements developed by the authors regarding the diagnosis or treatment of asbestos-related disease; experts then ranked their degree of agreement or disagreement utilizing an 11-level modified Likert scale for each statement. Each expert was asked to justify their selection and to suggest references in support of their opinion. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and the interquartile range were used to define {"}consensus.{"} The results of the collective Likert rankings, deidentified comments, and suggested references as well as the initial consensus results were then provided to the participating experts. Each panel member then ranked their extent of agreement with a modified statement for which consensus was not achieved. The process was repeated three times. Results: Consensus was achieved on all but 9 of 32 statements. Conclusions: Consensus was not achieved for nine statements. These statements may be topics for future research.",
author = "Banks, {Daniel E.} and Runhua Shi and Jerry McLarty and Cowl, {Clayton T.} and Dorsett Smith and Tarlo, {Susan M.} and Feroza Daroowalla and John Balmes and Michael Baumann",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1378/chest.08-1345",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "135",
pages = "1619--1627",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the respiratory health effects of asbestos

AU - Banks, Daniel E.

AU - Shi, Runhua

AU - McLarty, Jerry

AU - Cowl, Clayton T.

AU - Smith, Dorsett

AU - Tarlo, Susan M.

AU - Daroowalla, Feroza

AU - Balmes, John

AU - Baumann, Michael

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - Background: The diagnosis of and criteria for the evaluation of asbestos-related disease impairment remains controversial after decades of research. Assessing agreement among experts who study pneumoconiosis, and diagnose and treat patients with asbestos-related respiratory conditions may be the first step in clarifying clinical and forensic/administrative issues associated with asbestos-related pulmonary conditions. Methods: We conducted a Delphi study, an iterative method of obtaining consensus among a group of experts. An expert panel was identified using an objective, nonbiased algorithm, based on the number of asbestos-related disease publications authored during the preceding 10-year period. Identified experts were invited to participate by accessing an Internet site. Each expert was presented statements developed by the authors regarding the diagnosis or treatment of asbestos-related disease; experts then ranked their degree of agreement or disagreement utilizing an 11-level modified Likert scale for each statement. Each expert was asked to justify their selection and to suggest references in support of their opinion. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and the interquartile range were used to define "consensus." The results of the collective Likert rankings, deidentified comments, and suggested references as well as the initial consensus results were then provided to the participating experts. Each panel member then ranked their extent of agreement with a modified statement for which consensus was not achieved. The process was repeated three times. Results: Consensus was achieved on all but 9 of 32 statements. Conclusions: Consensus was not achieved for nine statements. These statements may be topics for future research.

AB - Background: The diagnosis of and criteria for the evaluation of asbestos-related disease impairment remains controversial after decades of research. Assessing agreement among experts who study pneumoconiosis, and diagnose and treat patients with asbestos-related respiratory conditions may be the first step in clarifying clinical and forensic/administrative issues associated with asbestos-related pulmonary conditions. Methods: We conducted a Delphi study, an iterative method of obtaining consensus among a group of experts. An expert panel was identified using an objective, nonbiased algorithm, based on the number of asbestos-related disease publications authored during the preceding 10-year period. Identified experts were invited to participate by accessing an Internet site. Each expert was presented statements developed by the authors regarding the diagnosis or treatment of asbestos-related disease; experts then ranked their degree of agreement or disagreement utilizing an 11-level modified Likert scale for each statement. Each expert was asked to justify their selection and to suggest references in support of their opinion. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and the interquartile range were used to define "consensus." The results of the collective Likert rankings, deidentified comments, and suggested references as well as the initial consensus results were then provided to the participating experts. Each panel member then ranked their extent of agreement with a modified statement for which consensus was not achieved. The process was repeated three times. Results: Consensus was achieved on all but 9 of 32 statements. Conclusions: Consensus was not achieved for nine statements. These statements may be topics for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66649096433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66649096433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.08-1345

DO - 10.1378/chest.08-1345

M3 - Article

VL - 135

SP - 1619

EP - 1627

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 6

ER -