TY - JOUR
T1 - All-Cause Failure Rates Increase With Time Following Meniscal Repair Despite Favorable Outcomes
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
AU - Ow, Zachariah Gene Wing
AU - Law, Michelle Shi Ni
AU - Ng, Cheng Han
AU - Krych, Aaron J.
AU - Saris, Daniel B.F.
AU - Debieux, Pedro
AU - Wong, Keng Lin
AU - Lin, Heng An
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: A. J. Krych is an editorial/board member for the American Journal of Sports Medicine and is a board or committee member of the International Cartilage Repair Society, the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery, and Orthopedic Sports Medicine, the Minnesota Orthopedic Society, and the Musculoskeletal Transplantation Foundation.__He has received research support from Aesculap/B.Braun, the Arthritis Foundation, Ceterix, Histogenics, and Arthrex. He has received royalties and been a paid consultant for Arthrex and Vericel. D. B. F. Saris has received research support from Arthrex, Ivy Sports, and Smith & Nephew. He is a paid consultant for Smith & Nephew, Cartiheal, and Vericel, outside the submitted work. He is on the editorial or governing board for the journal Cartilage. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material. K. L. Wong has received paid honorarium for lectures given for 3M-KCl.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this review is to perform a meta-analysis of studies reporting meniscus repair outcomes. Pooled analyses of such studies will provide an accurate estimate of the outcomes that can be expected following meniscal repair at various postoperative time points. Methods: A meta-analysis of meniscal repair failure (defined as persistent symptoms, lack of healing on magnetic resonance imaging or revision surgery) and other clinical outcomes was performed following meniscal repair. Patients included had traumatic, nondegenerative meniscal tears, were skeletally mature, and had specific time-points after surgery. Repairs included were performed either in isolation, or with concomitant ACL reconstruction. Because of the inherent heterogeneity of single-arm meta-analyses, pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Results: Rates of all-cause meniscal repair failure was pooled to be 12% at 0-1 years (95% CI:.09-.16), 15% at 2-3 years (95% CI:.11-.20), and 19% at 4-6 years (95% CI:.13-.24). Sensitivity analysis for studies performing meniscal repair entirely on patients with concomitant ACL reconstruction (ACLR) showed comparable rates of failure at similar time intervals. Development of osteoarthritis, in patients with knees previously free from articular pathologies, was 4% at 2-3 years (95% CI:.02-.07), and 10% at 4-6 years (95% CI:.03-.25). Conclusion: Meniscus repair for traumatic injuries have an all-cause failure rate that increases from 12% to 19% through a time period ranging from 1-6 years following surgery. The failure rates were comparable for patients with meniscal repairs performed with concomitant ACLRs. Level of Evidence: IV; Systematic Review of Level II-IV Studies.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this review is to perform a meta-analysis of studies reporting meniscus repair outcomes. Pooled analyses of such studies will provide an accurate estimate of the outcomes that can be expected following meniscal repair at various postoperative time points. Methods: A meta-analysis of meniscal repair failure (defined as persistent symptoms, lack of healing on magnetic resonance imaging or revision surgery) and other clinical outcomes was performed following meniscal repair. Patients included had traumatic, nondegenerative meniscal tears, were skeletally mature, and had specific time-points after surgery. Repairs included were performed either in isolation, or with concomitant ACL reconstruction. Because of the inherent heterogeneity of single-arm meta-analyses, pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Results: Rates of all-cause meniscal repair failure was pooled to be 12% at 0-1 years (95% CI:.09-.16), 15% at 2-3 years (95% CI:.11-.20), and 19% at 4-6 years (95% CI:.13-.24). Sensitivity analysis for studies performing meniscal repair entirely on patients with concomitant ACL reconstruction (ACLR) showed comparable rates of failure at similar time intervals. Development of osteoarthritis, in patients with knees previously free from articular pathologies, was 4% at 2-3 years (95% CI:.02-.07), and 10% at 4-6 years (95% CI:.03-.25). Conclusion: Meniscus repair for traumatic injuries have an all-cause failure rate that increases from 12% to 19% through a time period ranging from 1-6 years following surgery. The failure rates were comparable for patients with meniscal repairs performed with concomitant ACLRs. Level of Evidence: IV; Systematic Review of Level II-IV Studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108538719&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85108538719&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.033
DO - 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.033
M3 - Article
C2 - 34058318
AN - SCOPUS:85108538719
SN - 0749-8063
VL - 37
SP - 3518
EP - 3528
JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
IS - 12
ER -