Agreement for tumor grade of ovarian carcinoma

Analysis of archival tissues from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results residual tissue repository

Rayna K. Matsuno, Mark E. Sherman, Kala Visvanathan, Marc T. Goodman, Brenda Y. Hernandez, Charles F. Lynch, Olga B. Ioffe, David Horio, Charles Platz, Sean F. Altekruse, Ruth M. Pfeiffer, William F. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Emerging data suggest that ovarian cancers differ by tumor grade. However, the reliability of microscopic grade from paraffin tissue in the general medical community and as reflected in population-based cancer registries is unknown. Methods: We examined grade agreement between two gynecologic pathologists and the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Residual Tissue Repository (SEER). Grade agreement was assessed with percent observer agreement and kappa coefficients for 664 invasive ovarian carcinomas, using previously defined three-tier and two-tier grading systems. A random subset of ovarian carcinomas was selected to compare intra- and inter-pathologist agreement. Results: Five hundred and eighty-six of SEER's 664 tumors were confirmed invasive. Percent agreement was 49 % with fair kappa coefficient = 0.25 (95 % CI: 0.20-0.30) for the 664 tumors. Agreement improved slightly when restricted to the 586 confirmed invasive cancers; it was better for high grade than low grade tumors, for two-tier than three-tier grading systems, and within (66 %) than between study pathologists (43 %). Grade was not a robust independent predictor of ovarian cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: Grade agreement was fair between SEER and study pathologists irrespective of grading system. Recorded grade in SEER should be used with caution and is probably not a reliable metric for ovarian cancer epidemiology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)749-757
Number of pages9
JournalCancer Causes and Control
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Epidemiology
Carcinoma
Ovarian Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Paraffin
Registries
Pathologists
Population

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Kappa coefficient
  • Ovarian cancer
  • SEER
  • Tumor grade

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Agreement for tumor grade of ovarian carcinoma : Analysis of archival tissues from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results residual tissue repository. / Matsuno, Rayna K.; Sherman, Mark E.; Visvanathan, Kala; Goodman, Marc T.; Hernandez, Brenda Y.; Lynch, Charles F.; Ioffe, Olga B.; Horio, David; Platz, Charles; Altekruse, Sean F.; Pfeiffer, Ruth M.; Anderson, William F.

In: Cancer Causes and Control, Vol. 24, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 749-757.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matsuno, RK, Sherman, ME, Visvanathan, K, Goodman, MT, Hernandez, BY, Lynch, CF, Ioffe, OB, Horio, D, Platz, C, Altekruse, SF, Pfeiffer, RM & Anderson, WF 2013, 'Agreement for tumor grade of ovarian carcinoma: Analysis of archival tissues from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results residual tissue repository', Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 749-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-013-0157-5
Matsuno, Rayna K. ; Sherman, Mark E. ; Visvanathan, Kala ; Goodman, Marc T. ; Hernandez, Brenda Y. ; Lynch, Charles F. ; Ioffe, Olga B. ; Horio, David ; Platz, Charles ; Altekruse, Sean F. ; Pfeiffer, Ruth M. ; Anderson, William F. / Agreement for tumor grade of ovarian carcinoma : Analysis of archival tissues from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results residual tissue repository. In: Cancer Causes and Control. 2013 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 749-757.
@article{b3b5d25516a742c898501f4022f83daf,
title = "Agreement for tumor grade of ovarian carcinoma: Analysis of archival tissues from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results residual tissue repository",
abstract = "Background: Emerging data suggest that ovarian cancers differ by tumor grade. However, the reliability of microscopic grade from paraffin tissue in the general medical community and as reflected in population-based cancer registries is unknown. Methods: We examined grade agreement between two gynecologic pathologists and the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Residual Tissue Repository (SEER). Grade agreement was assessed with percent observer agreement and kappa coefficients for 664 invasive ovarian carcinomas, using previously defined three-tier and two-tier grading systems. A random subset of ovarian carcinomas was selected to compare intra- and inter-pathologist agreement. Results: Five hundred and eighty-six of SEER's 664 tumors were confirmed invasive. Percent agreement was 49 {\%} with fair kappa coefficient = 0.25 (95 {\%} CI: 0.20-0.30) for the 664 tumors. Agreement improved slightly when restricted to the 586 confirmed invasive cancers; it was better for high grade than low grade tumors, for two-tier than three-tier grading systems, and within (66 {\%}) than between study pathologists (43 {\%}). Grade was not a robust independent predictor of ovarian cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: Grade agreement was fair between SEER and study pathologists irrespective of grading system. Recorded grade in SEER should be used with caution and is probably not a reliable metric for ovarian cancer epidemiology.",
keywords = "Epidemiology, Kappa coefficient, Ovarian cancer, SEER, Tumor grade",
author = "Matsuno, {Rayna K.} and Sherman, {Mark E.} and Kala Visvanathan and Goodman, {Marc T.} and Hernandez, {Brenda Y.} and Lynch, {Charles F.} and Ioffe, {Olga B.} and David Horio and Charles Platz and Altekruse, {Sean F.} and Pfeiffer, {Ruth M.} and Anderson, {William F.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s10552-013-0157-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "749--757",
journal = "Cancer Causes and Control",
issn = "0957-5243",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agreement for tumor grade of ovarian carcinoma

T2 - Analysis of archival tissues from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results residual tissue repository

AU - Matsuno, Rayna K.

AU - Sherman, Mark E.

AU - Visvanathan, Kala

AU - Goodman, Marc T.

AU - Hernandez, Brenda Y.

AU - Lynch, Charles F.

AU - Ioffe, Olga B.

AU - Horio, David

AU - Platz, Charles

AU - Altekruse, Sean F.

AU - Pfeiffer, Ruth M.

AU - Anderson, William F.

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Background: Emerging data suggest that ovarian cancers differ by tumor grade. However, the reliability of microscopic grade from paraffin tissue in the general medical community and as reflected in population-based cancer registries is unknown. Methods: We examined grade agreement between two gynecologic pathologists and the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Residual Tissue Repository (SEER). Grade agreement was assessed with percent observer agreement and kappa coefficients for 664 invasive ovarian carcinomas, using previously defined three-tier and two-tier grading systems. A random subset of ovarian carcinomas was selected to compare intra- and inter-pathologist agreement. Results: Five hundred and eighty-six of SEER's 664 tumors were confirmed invasive. Percent agreement was 49 % with fair kappa coefficient = 0.25 (95 % CI: 0.20-0.30) for the 664 tumors. Agreement improved slightly when restricted to the 586 confirmed invasive cancers; it was better for high grade than low grade tumors, for two-tier than three-tier grading systems, and within (66 %) than between study pathologists (43 %). Grade was not a robust independent predictor of ovarian cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: Grade agreement was fair between SEER and study pathologists irrespective of grading system. Recorded grade in SEER should be used with caution and is probably not a reliable metric for ovarian cancer epidemiology.

AB - Background: Emerging data suggest that ovarian cancers differ by tumor grade. However, the reliability of microscopic grade from paraffin tissue in the general medical community and as reflected in population-based cancer registries is unknown. Methods: We examined grade agreement between two gynecologic pathologists and the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Residual Tissue Repository (SEER). Grade agreement was assessed with percent observer agreement and kappa coefficients for 664 invasive ovarian carcinomas, using previously defined three-tier and two-tier grading systems. A random subset of ovarian carcinomas was selected to compare intra- and inter-pathologist agreement. Results: Five hundred and eighty-six of SEER's 664 tumors were confirmed invasive. Percent agreement was 49 % with fair kappa coefficient = 0.25 (95 % CI: 0.20-0.30) for the 664 tumors. Agreement improved slightly when restricted to the 586 confirmed invasive cancers; it was better for high grade than low grade tumors, for two-tier than three-tier grading systems, and within (66 %) than between study pathologists (43 %). Grade was not a robust independent predictor of ovarian cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: Grade agreement was fair between SEER and study pathologists irrespective of grading system. Recorded grade in SEER should be used with caution and is probably not a reliable metric for ovarian cancer epidemiology.

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Kappa coefficient

KW - Ovarian cancer

KW - SEER

KW - Tumor grade

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876462833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876462833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10552-013-0157-5

DO - 10.1007/s10552-013-0157-5

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 749

EP - 757

JO - Cancer Causes and Control

JF - Cancer Causes and Control

SN - 0957-5243

IS - 4

ER -