Advances in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer through risk prediction, risk communication, and novel treatment approaches

Matthew D. Galsky, Josep Domingo-Domenech

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Although level I evidence supports the use of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy for the management of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), these treatment modalities are utilized in only a subset of patients. The reasons for lack of implementation of these treatment standards are multiple; patients may be considered ineligible for cisplatin or too old for safe cystectomy. Better means of determining a patient's probability of recurrence with surgery alone, or likelihood of benefit with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, are clearly needed. Models have been developed to individualize estimates of non-organ-confined disease based on pretreatment variables. It is critical that clinicians are able to effectively communicate complex risk-related data to patients to facilitate a shared medical decision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-92
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Advances in Hematology and Oncology
Volume11
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Keywords

  • Cisplatin
  • Muscle-invasive bladder cancer
  • Personalized therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Advances in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer through risk prediction, risk communication, and novel treatment approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this