Advances in the laboratory diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection

Andrej Trampuz, James M. Steckelberg, Douglas R. Osmon, Franklin R. Cockerill, Arlen D. Hanssen, Robin Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prosthetic joint implant surgery (arthroplasty) provides restoration of movement to almost half a million people each year in the USA, with major health and economic benefits. While the majority of recipients experience dramatic relief of preoperative pain at the arthroplasty site, some prostheses fail to achieve this result. This is most commonly the result of aseptic biomechanical failure or prosthetic joint infection (PJI), both of which are associated with significant morbidity. Because the management of PJI differs from that of aseptic failure, it is important to accurately differentiate these two entities. Current laboratory methods for diagnosis of PJI depend on isolation of a pathogen by culture from a clinical specimen (e.g., synovial fluid, periprosthetic tissue). However, as PJI is typically a low organism burden and focal infection caused by commensal micro-organisms, these methods have neither ideal sensitivity nor ideal specificity. Therefore, culture-independent molecular methods have been used to improve the diagnosis of PJI. In the research setting, detection of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) by polymerase chain reaction has been the prime focus of the molecular diagnosis of PJI. In this article, advantages and limitations of conventional and molecular methods for the laboratory diagnosis of PJI are reviewed, as is the use of methods that may improve detection of organisms in the biofilm environment. The diagnosis of PJI remains challenging and a rapid, sensitive and specific method is needed for appropriate surgical and medical treatment decisions in the growing arthroplasty population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalReviews in Medical Microbiology
Volume14
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2003

Fingerprint

Clinical Laboratory Techniques
Joints
Infection
Arthroplasty
Focal Infection
Synovial Fluid
Insurance Benefits
DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase
Biofilms
Ribosomal DNA
Prostheses and Implants
Economics
Morbidity
Pain
Polymerase Chain Reaction

Keywords

  • 16S ribosomal DNA
  • Laboratory diagnostics
  • Polymerase chain reaction
  • Prosthesis-related infections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology
  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

Trampuz, A., Steckelberg, J. M., Osmon, D. R., Cockerill, F. R., Hanssen, A. D., & Patel, R. (2003). Advances in the laboratory diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Reviews in Medical Microbiology, 14(1), 1-14.

Advances in the laboratory diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. / Trampuz, Andrej; Steckelberg, James M.; Osmon, Douglas R.; Cockerill, Franklin R.; Hanssen, Arlen D.; Patel, Robin.

In: Reviews in Medical Microbiology, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.2003, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trampuz, A, Steckelberg, JM, Osmon, DR, Cockerill, FR, Hanssen, AD & Patel, R 2003, 'Advances in the laboratory diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection', Reviews in Medical Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-14.
Trampuz A, Steckelberg JM, Osmon DR, Cockerill FR, Hanssen AD, Patel R. Advances in the laboratory diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Reviews in Medical Microbiology. 2003 Jan;14(1):1-14.
Trampuz, Andrej ; Steckelberg, James M. ; Osmon, Douglas R. ; Cockerill, Franklin R. ; Hanssen, Arlen D. ; Patel, Robin. / Advances in the laboratory diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. In: Reviews in Medical Microbiology. 2003 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 1-14.
@article{b969a35584b0406aa31b544267f9772b,
title = "Advances in the laboratory diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection",
abstract = "Prosthetic joint implant surgery (arthroplasty) provides restoration of movement to almost half a million people each year in the USA, with major health and economic benefits. While the majority of recipients experience dramatic relief of preoperative pain at the arthroplasty site, some prostheses fail to achieve this result. This is most commonly the result of aseptic biomechanical failure or prosthetic joint infection (PJI), both of which are associated with significant morbidity. Because the management of PJI differs from that of aseptic failure, it is important to accurately differentiate these two entities. Current laboratory methods for diagnosis of PJI depend on isolation of a pathogen by culture from a clinical specimen (e.g., synovial fluid, periprosthetic tissue). However, as PJI is typically a low organism burden and focal infection caused by commensal micro-organisms, these methods have neither ideal sensitivity nor ideal specificity. Therefore, culture-independent molecular methods have been used to improve the diagnosis of PJI. In the research setting, detection of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) by polymerase chain reaction has been the prime focus of the molecular diagnosis of PJI. In this article, advantages and limitations of conventional and molecular methods for the laboratory diagnosis of PJI are reviewed, as is the use of methods that may improve detection of organisms in the biofilm environment. The diagnosis of PJI remains challenging and a rapid, sensitive and specific method is needed for appropriate surgical and medical treatment decisions in the growing arthroplasty population.",
keywords = "16S ribosomal DNA, Laboratory diagnostics, Polymerase chain reaction, Prosthesis-related infections",
author = "Andrej Trampuz and Steckelberg, {James M.} and Osmon, {Douglas R.} and Cockerill, {Franklin R.} and Hanssen, {Arlen D.} and Robin Patel",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Reviews in Medical Microbiology",
issn = "0954-139X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advances in the laboratory diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection

AU - Trampuz, Andrej

AU - Steckelberg, James M.

AU - Osmon, Douglas R.

AU - Cockerill, Franklin R.

AU - Hanssen, Arlen D.

AU - Patel, Robin

PY - 2003/1

Y1 - 2003/1

N2 - Prosthetic joint implant surgery (arthroplasty) provides restoration of movement to almost half a million people each year in the USA, with major health and economic benefits. While the majority of recipients experience dramatic relief of preoperative pain at the arthroplasty site, some prostheses fail to achieve this result. This is most commonly the result of aseptic biomechanical failure or prosthetic joint infection (PJI), both of which are associated with significant morbidity. Because the management of PJI differs from that of aseptic failure, it is important to accurately differentiate these two entities. Current laboratory methods for diagnosis of PJI depend on isolation of a pathogen by culture from a clinical specimen (e.g., synovial fluid, periprosthetic tissue). However, as PJI is typically a low organism burden and focal infection caused by commensal micro-organisms, these methods have neither ideal sensitivity nor ideal specificity. Therefore, culture-independent molecular methods have been used to improve the diagnosis of PJI. In the research setting, detection of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) by polymerase chain reaction has been the prime focus of the molecular diagnosis of PJI. In this article, advantages and limitations of conventional and molecular methods for the laboratory diagnosis of PJI are reviewed, as is the use of methods that may improve detection of organisms in the biofilm environment. The diagnosis of PJI remains challenging and a rapid, sensitive and specific method is needed for appropriate surgical and medical treatment decisions in the growing arthroplasty population.

AB - Prosthetic joint implant surgery (arthroplasty) provides restoration of movement to almost half a million people each year in the USA, with major health and economic benefits. While the majority of recipients experience dramatic relief of preoperative pain at the arthroplasty site, some prostheses fail to achieve this result. This is most commonly the result of aseptic biomechanical failure or prosthetic joint infection (PJI), both of which are associated with significant morbidity. Because the management of PJI differs from that of aseptic failure, it is important to accurately differentiate these two entities. Current laboratory methods for diagnosis of PJI depend on isolation of a pathogen by culture from a clinical specimen (e.g., synovial fluid, periprosthetic tissue). However, as PJI is typically a low organism burden and focal infection caused by commensal micro-organisms, these methods have neither ideal sensitivity nor ideal specificity. Therefore, culture-independent molecular methods have been used to improve the diagnosis of PJI. In the research setting, detection of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) by polymerase chain reaction has been the prime focus of the molecular diagnosis of PJI. In this article, advantages and limitations of conventional and molecular methods for the laboratory diagnosis of PJI are reviewed, as is the use of methods that may improve detection of organisms in the biofilm environment. The diagnosis of PJI remains challenging and a rapid, sensitive and specific method is needed for appropriate surgical and medical treatment decisions in the growing arthroplasty population.

KW - 16S ribosomal DNA

KW - Laboratory diagnostics

KW - Polymerase chain reaction

KW - Prosthesis-related infections

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037239668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037239668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Reviews in Medical Microbiology

JF - Reviews in Medical Microbiology

SN - 0954-139X

IS - 1

ER -