TY - JOUR
T1 - Advances in robotic prostatectomy
AU - Boorjian, Stephen A.
AU - Gettman, Matthew T.
PY - 2008/5
Y1 - 2008/5
N2 - Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has emerged as an important treatment option for localized prostate cancer. As such, methods to improve instrumentation, technique, outcomes, and cost require continued investigation. For example, a recently introduced four-armed robotic system has limited the need for bedside assistants, while an enhanced understanding of pelvic anatomy as visualized robotically has led to valuable modifications in operative technique. Increased surgeon experience has decreased perioperative morbidity, and has resulted in short-term pathologic and functional outcomes that compare favorably with open radical prostatectomy. Meanwhile, quality-of-life studies using validated instruments are helping to define the time course of patient recovery. Nevertheless, costs associated with robotic surgery remain daunting. As the follow-up of patients treated with RALP matures, future studies, ideally with a prospective, randomized design, will be needed to establish the long-term oncologic efficacy of the procedure and to evaluate the overall advantages of RALP compared with open surgery.
AB - Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has emerged as an important treatment option for localized prostate cancer. As such, methods to improve instrumentation, technique, outcomes, and cost require continued investigation. For example, a recently introduced four-armed robotic system has limited the need for bedside assistants, while an enhanced understanding of pelvic anatomy as visualized robotically has led to valuable modifications in operative technique. Increased surgeon experience has decreased perioperative morbidity, and has resulted in short-term pathologic and functional outcomes that compare favorably with open radical prostatectomy. Meanwhile, quality-of-life studies using validated instruments are helping to define the time course of patient recovery. Nevertheless, costs associated with robotic surgery remain daunting. As the follow-up of patients treated with RALP matures, future studies, ideally with a prospective, randomized design, will be needed to establish the long-term oncologic efficacy of the procedure and to evaluate the overall advantages of RALP compared with open surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44449142371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44449142371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11934-008-0043-y
DO - 10.1007/s11934-008-0043-y
M3 - Review article
C2 - 18765121
AN - SCOPUS:44449142371
SN - 1527-2737
VL - 9
SP - 250
EP - 256
JO - Current Urology Reports
JF - Current Urology Reports
IS - 3
ER -