Advances and controversies in clinical nutrition: The education outcome of a live continuing medical education course

James S. Scolapio, John K. DiBaise, W. Frederick Schwenk, Mary E. Macke, Rosann Burdette

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess participants' nutrition knowledge and practice behavior before and after completing a live continuing medical education (CME) nutrition course designed for practicing nutrition clinicians. Methods: Electronic surveys were sent to the first 100 registered participants before and after attending the course. The curriculum consisted of 16.75 hours of live education. The curriculum was revised when the precourse surveys identified a gap in medical knowledge or practice behavior. Knowledge change was assessed by a 15-question survey given before and 1 week after the course. Change in practice behavior was accessed by a 10-question survey administered 2 months after the course. Results: Dietitians were the predominant discipline group attending the course. Sixty-three percent of those surveyed practiced hospital nutrition, 19% outpatient nutrition, and 18% an equal mix. Forty-eight percent indicated that they write parenteral nutrition (PN) orders and 51% write enteral nutrition (EN) orders; of these, 62% indicated they are comfortable writing PN orders and 81% are comfortable writing EN orders. Twenty-three percent indicated that they manage home PN and EN patients. Twenty-six percent stated they were certified in nutrition support. Seventy-eight percent of the participants responded to survey 2; the median correct response rates were 51% pre- and 76% postcourse. Seventy percent responded to survey 3; the median positive clinical practice behavior change was 69%. Conclusion: This live CME course improved knowledge, and a majority of attendants reported changing their nutrition practice after this course.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)90-95
Number of pages6
JournalNutrition in Clinical Practice
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2008

Fingerprint

medical education
adult education
Continuing Medical Education
clinical nutrition
education
nutrition
Education
enteral feeding
Enteral Nutrition
parenteral feeding
Parenteral Nutrition
curriculum
Curriculum
Home Parenteral Nutrition
nutrition knowledge
Nutritionists
dietitians
behavior change
electronics
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Food Science

Cite this

Advances and controversies in clinical nutrition : The education outcome of a live continuing medical education course. / Scolapio, James S.; DiBaise, John K.; Schwenk, W. Frederick; Macke, Mary E.; Burdette, Rosann.

In: Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 23, No. 1, 02.2008, p. 90-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scolapio, James S. ; DiBaise, John K. ; Schwenk, W. Frederick ; Macke, Mary E. ; Burdette, Rosann. / Advances and controversies in clinical nutrition : The education outcome of a live continuing medical education course. In: Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2008 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 90-95.
@article{bea9d1409e574bf199bac89290010f58,
title = "Advances and controversies in clinical nutrition: The education outcome of a live continuing medical education course",
abstract = "Background: The aim of this study was to assess participants' nutrition knowledge and practice behavior before and after completing a live continuing medical education (CME) nutrition course designed for practicing nutrition clinicians. Methods: Electronic surveys were sent to the first 100 registered participants before and after attending the course. The curriculum consisted of 16.75 hours of live education. The curriculum was revised when the precourse surveys identified a gap in medical knowledge or practice behavior. Knowledge change was assessed by a 15-question survey given before and 1 week after the course. Change in practice behavior was accessed by a 10-question survey administered 2 months after the course. Results: Dietitians were the predominant discipline group attending the course. Sixty-three percent of those surveyed practiced hospital nutrition, 19{\%} outpatient nutrition, and 18{\%} an equal mix. Forty-eight percent indicated that they write parenteral nutrition (PN) orders and 51{\%} write enteral nutrition (EN) orders; of these, 62{\%} indicated they are comfortable writing PN orders and 81{\%} are comfortable writing EN orders. Twenty-three percent indicated that they manage home PN and EN patients. Twenty-six percent stated they were certified in nutrition support. Seventy-eight percent of the participants responded to survey 2; the median correct response rates were 51{\%} pre- and 76{\%} postcourse. Seventy percent responded to survey 3; the median positive clinical practice behavior change was 69{\%}. Conclusion: This live CME course improved knowledge, and a majority of attendants reported changing their nutrition practice after this course.",
author = "Scolapio, {James S.} and DiBaise, {John K.} and Schwenk, {W. Frederick} and Macke, {Mary E.} and Rosann Burdette",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/011542650802300190",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "90--95",
journal = "Nutrition in Clinical Practice",
issn = "0884-5336",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advances and controversies in clinical nutrition

T2 - The education outcome of a live continuing medical education course

AU - Scolapio, James S.

AU - DiBaise, John K.

AU - Schwenk, W. Frederick

AU - Macke, Mary E.

AU - Burdette, Rosann

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to assess participants' nutrition knowledge and practice behavior before and after completing a live continuing medical education (CME) nutrition course designed for practicing nutrition clinicians. Methods: Electronic surveys were sent to the first 100 registered participants before and after attending the course. The curriculum consisted of 16.75 hours of live education. The curriculum was revised when the precourse surveys identified a gap in medical knowledge or practice behavior. Knowledge change was assessed by a 15-question survey given before and 1 week after the course. Change in practice behavior was accessed by a 10-question survey administered 2 months after the course. Results: Dietitians were the predominant discipline group attending the course. Sixty-three percent of those surveyed practiced hospital nutrition, 19% outpatient nutrition, and 18% an equal mix. Forty-eight percent indicated that they write parenteral nutrition (PN) orders and 51% write enteral nutrition (EN) orders; of these, 62% indicated they are comfortable writing PN orders and 81% are comfortable writing EN orders. Twenty-three percent indicated that they manage home PN and EN patients. Twenty-six percent stated they were certified in nutrition support. Seventy-eight percent of the participants responded to survey 2; the median correct response rates were 51% pre- and 76% postcourse. Seventy percent responded to survey 3; the median positive clinical practice behavior change was 69%. Conclusion: This live CME course improved knowledge, and a majority of attendants reported changing their nutrition practice after this course.

AB - Background: The aim of this study was to assess participants' nutrition knowledge and practice behavior before and after completing a live continuing medical education (CME) nutrition course designed for practicing nutrition clinicians. Methods: Electronic surveys were sent to the first 100 registered participants before and after attending the course. The curriculum consisted of 16.75 hours of live education. The curriculum was revised when the precourse surveys identified a gap in medical knowledge or practice behavior. Knowledge change was assessed by a 15-question survey given before and 1 week after the course. Change in practice behavior was accessed by a 10-question survey administered 2 months after the course. Results: Dietitians were the predominant discipline group attending the course. Sixty-three percent of those surveyed practiced hospital nutrition, 19% outpatient nutrition, and 18% an equal mix. Forty-eight percent indicated that they write parenteral nutrition (PN) orders and 51% write enteral nutrition (EN) orders; of these, 62% indicated they are comfortable writing PN orders and 81% are comfortable writing EN orders. Twenty-three percent indicated that they manage home PN and EN patients. Twenty-six percent stated they were certified in nutrition support. Seventy-eight percent of the participants responded to survey 2; the median correct response rates were 51% pre- and 76% postcourse. Seventy percent responded to survey 3; the median positive clinical practice behavior change was 69%. Conclusion: This live CME course improved knowledge, and a majority of attendants reported changing their nutrition practice after this course.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41149161841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41149161841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/011542650802300190

DO - 10.1177/011542650802300190

M3 - Article

C2 - 18203969

AN - SCOPUS:41149161841

VL - 23

SP - 90

EP - 95

JO - Nutrition in Clinical Practice

JF - Nutrition in Clinical Practice

SN - 0884-5336

IS - 1

ER -