Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Incidence and clinical outcomes of patients requiring anterior versus posterior repeat cervical fusion

Mohamad Bydon, Risheng Xu, Rafael De La Garza-Ramos, Mohamed Macki, Daniel M. Sciubba, Jean Paul Wolinsky, Timothy F. Witham, Ziya L. Gokaslan, Ali Bydon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background : Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a well-recognized long-term outcome in patients with degenerative disease of the spine. In this manuscript, we focus on the development in ASD in patients who have undergone a prior anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods : Patient data were collected via clinical notes and patient interviews. Patients were followed for an average of 92.4 ± 72.6 months after the index ACDF. Results : Of the 108 patients who underwent revision surgery due to symptomatic ASD, 77 patients underwent re-do ACDF, while 31 patients had posterior fusion surgery. Patients were more likely to be operated on posteriorly if they were older (P = 0.0115), male (P = 0.006), or had a higher number of cervical vertebral segments fused during the index ACDF (P = 0.013). These patients were statistically also more likely to exhibit myelopathic symptoms (P = 0.0053), and usually had worse neurologic function as assessed on the Nurick (P = 0.0005) and ASIA scales (P = 0.0020). Postoperatively, patients receiving anterior revision surgeries had higher rates of recurrent radiculopathy (P = 0.0425) and higher recurrence of ASD compared with patients fused posteriorly (P < 0.0001). Conclusions : Patients undergoing an anterior revision surgery for ASD after ACDF have higher rates of postoperative radiculopathy and redevelopment of ASD when compared with posteriorly approached patients. Patients receiving posterior revision surgery had higher intraoperative blood loss, hospitalizations, and postoperative complications such as wound infections and discharge to rehabilitation, but had a statistically lower chance of redevelopment of ASD requiring secondary revision surgery. This may be due to the fact that posterior revision surgeries involved more levels fused. This study provides one of the longest and most comprehensive follow-ups of this challenging patient population. Prospective studies comparing surgical approaches and techniques are needed to corroborate our findings. Copyright:

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSurgical Neurology International
Volume5
Issue numberSUPPL. 3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diskectomy
Incidence
Reoperation
Radiculopathy
Wound Infection

Keywords

  • Adjacent level disease
  • adjacent segment disease
  • anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
  • cervical
  • spine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion : Incidence and clinical outcomes of patients requiring anterior versus posterior repeat cervical fusion. / Bydon, Mohamad; Xu, Risheng; De La Garza-Ramos, Rafael; Macki, Mohamed; Sciubba, Daniel M.; Wolinsky, Jean Paul; Witham, Timothy F.; Gokaslan, Ziya L.; Bydon, Ali.

In: Surgical Neurology International, Vol. 5, No. SUPPL. 3, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bydon, Mohamad ; Xu, Risheng ; De La Garza-Ramos, Rafael ; Macki, Mohamed ; Sciubba, Daniel M. ; Wolinsky, Jean Paul ; Witham, Timothy F. ; Gokaslan, Ziya L. ; Bydon, Ali. / Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion : Incidence and clinical outcomes of patients requiring anterior versus posterior repeat cervical fusion. In: Surgical Neurology International. 2014 ; Vol. 5, No. SUPPL. 3.
@article{f349c2a233ac4b27ab0a87f7a8eec850,
title = "Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Incidence and clinical outcomes of patients requiring anterior versus posterior repeat cervical fusion",
abstract = "Background : Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a well-recognized long-term outcome in patients with degenerative disease of the spine. In this manuscript, we focus on the development in ASD in patients who have undergone a prior anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods : Patient data were collected via clinical notes and patient interviews. Patients were followed for an average of 92.4 ± 72.6 months after the index ACDF. Results : Of the 108 patients who underwent revision surgery due to symptomatic ASD, 77 patients underwent re-do ACDF, while 31 patients had posterior fusion surgery. Patients were more likely to be operated on posteriorly if they were older (P = 0.0115), male (P = 0.006), or had a higher number of cervical vertebral segments fused during the index ACDF (P = 0.013). These patients were statistically also more likely to exhibit myelopathic symptoms (P = 0.0053), and usually had worse neurologic function as assessed on the Nurick (P = 0.0005) and ASIA scales (P = 0.0020). Postoperatively, patients receiving anterior revision surgeries had higher rates of recurrent radiculopathy (P = 0.0425) and higher recurrence of ASD compared with patients fused posteriorly (P < 0.0001). Conclusions : Patients undergoing an anterior revision surgery for ASD after ACDF have higher rates of postoperative radiculopathy and redevelopment of ASD when compared with posteriorly approached patients. Patients receiving posterior revision surgery had higher intraoperative blood loss, hospitalizations, and postoperative complications such as wound infections and discharge to rehabilitation, but had a statistically lower chance of redevelopment of ASD requiring secondary revision surgery. This may be due to the fact that posterior revision surgeries involved more levels fused. This study provides one of the longest and most comprehensive follow-ups of this challenging patient population. Prospective studies comparing surgical approaches and techniques are needed to corroborate our findings. Copyright:",
keywords = "Adjacent level disease, adjacent segment disease, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cervical, spine",
author = "Mohamad Bydon and Risheng Xu and {De La Garza-Ramos}, Rafael and Mohamed Macki and Sciubba, {Daniel M.} and Wolinsky, {Jean Paul} and Witham, {Timothy F.} and Gokaslan, {Ziya L.} and Ali Bydon",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.4103/2152-7806.130676",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Surgical Neurology International",
issn = "2152-7806",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "SUPPL. 3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

T2 - Incidence and clinical outcomes of patients requiring anterior versus posterior repeat cervical fusion

AU - Bydon, Mohamad

AU - Xu, Risheng

AU - De La Garza-Ramos, Rafael

AU - Macki, Mohamed

AU - Sciubba, Daniel M.

AU - Wolinsky, Jean Paul

AU - Witham, Timothy F.

AU - Gokaslan, Ziya L.

AU - Bydon, Ali

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background : Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a well-recognized long-term outcome in patients with degenerative disease of the spine. In this manuscript, we focus on the development in ASD in patients who have undergone a prior anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods : Patient data were collected via clinical notes and patient interviews. Patients were followed for an average of 92.4 ± 72.6 months after the index ACDF. Results : Of the 108 patients who underwent revision surgery due to symptomatic ASD, 77 patients underwent re-do ACDF, while 31 patients had posterior fusion surgery. Patients were more likely to be operated on posteriorly if they were older (P = 0.0115), male (P = 0.006), or had a higher number of cervical vertebral segments fused during the index ACDF (P = 0.013). These patients were statistically also more likely to exhibit myelopathic symptoms (P = 0.0053), and usually had worse neurologic function as assessed on the Nurick (P = 0.0005) and ASIA scales (P = 0.0020). Postoperatively, patients receiving anterior revision surgeries had higher rates of recurrent radiculopathy (P = 0.0425) and higher recurrence of ASD compared with patients fused posteriorly (P < 0.0001). Conclusions : Patients undergoing an anterior revision surgery for ASD after ACDF have higher rates of postoperative radiculopathy and redevelopment of ASD when compared with posteriorly approached patients. Patients receiving posterior revision surgery had higher intraoperative blood loss, hospitalizations, and postoperative complications such as wound infections and discharge to rehabilitation, but had a statistically lower chance of redevelopment of ASD requiring secondary revision surgery. This may be due to the fact that posterior revision surgeries involved more levels fused. This study provides one of the longest and most comprehensive follow-ups of this challenging patient population. Prospective studies comparing surgical approaches and techniques are needed to corroborate our findings. Copyright:

AB - Background : Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a well-recognized long-term outcome in patients with degenerative disease of the spine. In this manuscript, we focus on the development in ASD in patients who have undergone a prior anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods : Patient data were collected via clinical notes and patient interviews. Patients were followed for an average of 92.4 ± 72.6 months after the index ACDF. Results : Of the 108 patients who underwent revision surgery due to symptomatic ASD, 77 patients underwent re-do ACDF, while 31 patients had posterior fusion surgery. Patients were more likely to be operated on posteriorly if they were older (P = 0.0115), male (P = 0.006), or had a higher number of cervical vertebral segments fused during the index ACDF (P = 0.013). These patients were statistically also more likely to exhibit myelopathic symptoms (P = 0.0053), and usually had worse neurologic function as assessed on the Nurick (P = 0.0005) and ASIA scales (P = 0.0020). Postoperatively, patients receiving anterior revision surgeries had higher rates of recurrent radiculopathy (P = 0.0425) and higher recurrence of ASD compared with patients fused posteriorly (P < 0.0001). Conclusions : Patients undergoing an anterior revision surgery for ASD after ACDF have higher rates of postoperative radiculopathy and redevelopment of ASD when compared with posteriorly approached patients. Patients receiving posterior revision surgery had higher intraoperative blood loss, hospitalizations, and postoperative complications such as wound infections and discharge to rehabilitation, but had a statistically lower chance of redevelopment of ASD requiring secondary revision surgery. This may be due to the fact that posterior revision surgeries involved more levels fused. This study provides one of the longest and most comprehensive follow-ups of this challenging patient population. Prospective studies comparing surgical approaches and techniques are needed to corroborate our findings. Copyright:

KW - Adjacent level disease

KW - adjacent segment disease

KW - anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

KW - cervical

KW - spine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906836493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906836493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/2152-7806.130676

DO - 10.4103/2152-7806.130676

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Surgical Neurology International

JF - Surgical Neurology International

SN - 2152-7806

IS - SUPPL. 3

ER -