TY - JOUR
T1 - Adherence to Public Health Measures Mitigates the Risk of COVID-19 Infection in Older Adults
T2 - A Community-Based Study
AU - Juhn, Young J.
AU - Wi, Chung Il
AU - Ryu, Euijung
AU - Sampathkumar, Priya
AU - Takahashi, Paul Y.
AU - Yao, Joseph D.
AU - Binnicker, Matthew J.
AU - Natoli, Traci L.
AU - Evans, Tamara K.
AU - King, Katherine S.
AU - Volpe, Stephanie
AU - Pirçon, Jean Yves
AU - Silvia Damaso, Damaso
AU - Pignolo, Robert J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Grant Support: This collaborative (investigator-initiated) observational study was supported by a research grant from GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (grant no. NIH UL1 TR000135). The funders for this investigator-initiated study had no influence on the study design, data collection, analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Objective: To assess the prevalence and characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases during the reopening period in older adults, given that little is known about the prevalence of COVID-19 after the stay-at-home order was lifted in the United States, nor the actual effects of adherence to recommended public health measures (RPHM) on the risk of COVID-19. Patients and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study nested in a parent prospective cohort study, which followed a population-based sample of 2325 adults 50 years and older residing in southeast Minnesota to assess the incidence of viral infections. Participants were instructed to self-collect both nasal and oropharyngeal swabs, which were tested by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction–based severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) assay between May 8, 2020, and June, 30, 2020. We assessed the prevalence of COVID-19 cases and characteristics of study subjects. Results: A total of 1505 eligible subjects participated in the study whose mean age was 68 years, with 885 (59%) women, 32 (2%) racial/ethnic minorities, and 906 (60%) with high-risk conditions for influenza. The prevalence of other Coronaviridae (human coronavirus [HCoV]-229E, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-OC43) during the 2019 to 2020 flu season was 109 (7%), and none tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Almost all participants reported adhering to the RPHM (1,488 [99%] for social distancing, 1,438 [96%] for wearing mask in a public space, 1,476 [98%] for hand hygiene, and 1,441 (96%) for staying home mostly). Eighty-six percent of participants resided in a single-family home. Conclusion: We did not identify SARS-COV-2 infection in our study cohort. The combination of participants’ behavior in following the RPHM and their living environment may considerably mitigate the risk of COVID-19.
AB - Objective: To assess the prevalence and characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases during the reopening period in older adults, given that little is known about the prevalence of COVID-19 after the stay-at-home order was lifted in the United States, nor the actual effects of adherence to recommended public health measures (RPHM) on the risk of COVID-19. Patients and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study nested in a parent prospective cohort study, which followed a population-based sample of 2325 adults 50 years and older residing in southeast Minnesota to assess the incidence of viral infections. Participants were instructed to self-collect both nasal and oropharyngeal swabs, which were tested by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction–based severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) assay between May 8, 2020, and June, 30, 2020. We assessed the prevalence of COVID-19 cases and characteristics of study subjects. Results: A total of 1505 eligible subjects participated in the study whose mean age was 68 years, with 885 (59%) women, 32 (2%) racial/ethnic minorities, and 906 (60%) with high-risk conditions for influenza. The prevalence of other Coronaviridae (human coronavirus [HCoV]-229E, HCoV-NL63, and HCoV-OC43) during the 2019 to 2020 flu season was 109 (7%), and none tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Almost all participants reported adhering to the RPHM (1,488 [99%] for social distancing, 1,438 [96%] for wearing mask in a public space, 1,476 [98%] for hand hygiene, and 1,441 (96%) for staying home mostly). Eighty-six percent of participants resided in a single-family home. Conclusion: We did not identify SARS-COV-2 infection in our study cohort. The combination of participants’ behavior in following the RPHM and their living environment may considerably mitigate the risk of COVID-19.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103005376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103005376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.12.016
DO - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.12.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 33714601
AN - SCOPUS:85103005376
SN - 0025-6196
VL - 96
SP - 912
EP - 920
JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
IS - 4
ER -