TY - JOUR
T1 - Added Value of Selected Images Embedded Into Radiology Reports to Referring Clinicians
AU - Iyer, Veena R.
AU - Hahn, Peter F.
AU - Blaszkowsky, Lawrence S.
AU - Thayer, Sarah P.
AU - Halpern, Elkan F.
AU - Harisinghani, Mukesh G.
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the added utility of embedding images for findings described in radiology text reports to referring clinicians. Methods: Thirty-five cases referred for abdominal CT scans in 2007 and 2008 were included. Referring physicians were asked to view text-only reports, followed by the same reports with pertinent images embedded. For each pair of reports, a questionnaire was administered. A 5-point, Likert-type scale was used to assess if the clinical query was satisfactorily answered by the text-only report. A "yes-or-no" question was used to assess whether the report with images answered the clinical query better; a positive answer to this question generated "yes-or-no" queries to examine whether the report with images helped in making a more confident decision on management, whether it reduced time spent in forming the plan, and whether it altered management. The questionnaire asked whether a radiologist would be contacted with queries on reading the text-only report and the report with images. Results: In 32 of 35 cases, the text-only reports satisfactorily answered the clinical queries. In these 32 cases, the reports with attached images helped in making more confident management decisions and reduced time in planning management. Attached images altered management in 2 cases. Radiologists would have been consulted for clarifications in 21 and 10 cases on reading the text-only reports and the reports with embedded images, respectively. Conclusions: Providing relevant images with reports saves time, increases physicians' confidence in deciding treatment plans, and can alter management.
AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the added utility of embedding images for findings described in radiology text reports to referring clinicians. Methods: Thirty-five cases referred for abdominal CT scans in 2007 and 2008 were included. Referring physicians were asked to view text-only reports, followed by the same reports with pertinent images embedded. For each pair of reports, a questionnaire was administered. A 5-point, Likert-type scale was used to assess if the clinical query was satisfactorily answered by the text-only report. A "yes-or-no" question was used to assess whether the report with images answered the clinical query better; a positive answer to this question generated "yes-or-no" queries to examine whether the report with images helped in making a more confident decision on management, whether it reduced time spent in forming the plan, and whether it altered management. The questionnaire asked whether a radiologist would be contacted with queries on reading the text-only report and the report with images. Results: In 32 of 35 cases, the text-only reports satisfactorily answered the clinical queries. In these 32 cases, the reports with attached images helped in making more confident management decisions and reduced time in planning management. Attached images altered management in 2 cases. Radiologists would have been consulted for clarifications in 21 and 10 cases on reading the text-only reports and the reports with embedded images, respectively. Conclusions: Providing relevant images with reports saves time, increases physicians' confidence in deciding treatment plans, and can alter management.
KW - Radiology reporting
KW - communication
KW - digital images
KW - radiology practice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928096215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928096215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.10.014
DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.10.014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84928096215
SN - 1546-1440
VL - 7
SP - 205
EP - 210
JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology
IS - 3
ER -