Activity aprons for inpatients requiring individual nursing assignment care: A prospective randomized controlled pilot study

Michael W. Ruff, Anthony Fine, Jayawant Mandrekar, Cindy Sweeney, Lyell Jones, James P. Klaas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Activity aprons are commercially available products used to occupy patients with dementia at home or in longterm care facilities. We hypothesized that inpatient use of activity aprons could potentially reduce or eliminate behaviors that result in self-harm, increased nursing supervision, and restraint use in an inpatient hospital setting. Methods: A single-center prospective randomized controlled pilot study was performed from July 2015 to November 2016 comparing activity apron plus standard care versus standard care alone. Consecutively enrolled patients were randomized by stratified randomization using age (cutoff: 80 years) and preexisting diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment. Primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of apron use. Secondary outcomes included duration of hospitalization postrandomization and individual nursing assignment (IA), time in restraints, nonphysical restraints use, falls, apron-related complications, dismissal destination, and 30-day hospital readmission. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled, with 13 randomized to apron and 17 randomized to the control group. There was no statistically significant reduction in mean length of hospital stay (15.8 vs 21.5 day; P = .40), duration of IA compared to non-apron control group (6.4 vs 9.1, respectively; P = .39), or antipsychotic medication use (61.5% vs 70.6% in control group; P = .60). No complications secondary to apron use were seen. Conclusions: Activity aprons are a safe addition to the standard of care when managing encephalopathic patients in the inpatient setting. These aprons may have a role as part of a comprehensive complement of interventions to address delirium and encephalopathy in hospitalized patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-187
Number of pages5
JournalNeurohospitalist
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Nursing Care
Inpatients
Nursing
Standard of Care
Control Groups
Dementia
Length of Stay
Patient Readmission
Delirium
Brain Diseases
Random Allocation
Antipsychotic Agents
Hospitalization
Safety

Keywords

  • Activity apron
  • Individual nursing assignment
  • Length of hospitalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Activity aprons for inpatients requiring individual nursing assignment care : A prospective randomized controlled pilot study. / Ruff, Michael W.; Fine, Anthony; Mandrekar, Jayawant; Sweeney, Cindy; Jones, Lyell; Klaas, James P.

In: Neurohospitalist, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.01.2018, p. 183-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{076b8540cce643549861ed8701165d32,
title = "Activity aprons for inpatients requiring individual nursing assignment care: A prospective randomized controlled pilot study",
abstract = "Background: Activity aprons are commercially available products used to occupy patients with dementia at home or in longterm care facilities. We hypothesized that inpatient use of activity aprons could potentially reduce or eliminate behaviors that result in self-harm, increased nursing supervision, and restraint use in an inpatient hospital setting. Methods: A single-center prospective randomized controlled pilot study was performed from July 2015 to November 2016 comparing activity apron plus standard care versus standard care alone. Consecutively enrolled patients were randomized by stratified randomization using age (cutoff: 80 years) and preexisting diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment. Primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of apron use. Secondary outcomes included duration of hospitalization postrandomization and individual nursing assignment (IA), time in restraints, nonphysical restraints use, falls, apron-related complications, dismissal destination, and 30-day hospital readmission. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled, with 13 randomized to apron and 17 randomized to the control group. There was no statistically significant reduction in mean length of hospital stay (15.8 vs 21.5 day; P = .40), duration of IA compared to non-apron control group (6.4 vs 9.1, respectively; P = .39), or antipsychotic medication use (61.5{\%} vs 70.6{\%} in control group; P = .60). No complications secondary to apron use were seen. Conclusions: Activity aprons are a safe addition to the standard of care when managing encephalopathic patients in the inpatient setting. These aprons may have a role as part of a comprehensive complement of interventions to address delirium and encephalopathy in hospitalized patients.",
keywords = "Activity apron, Individual nursing assignment, Length of hospitalization",
author = "Ruff, {Michael W.} and Anthony Fine and Jayawant Mandrekar and Cindy Sweeney and Lyell Jones and Klaas, {James P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1941874418773945",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "183--187",
journal = "The Neurohospitalist",
issn = "1941-8744",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Activity aprons for inpatients requiring individual nursing assignment care

T2 - A prospective randomized controlled pilot study

AU - Ruff, Michael W.

AU - Fine, Anthony

AU - Mandrekar, Jayawant

AU - Sweeney, Cindy

AU - Jones, Lyell

AU - Klaas, James P.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Activity aprons are commercially available products used to occupy patients with dementia at home or in longterm care facilities. We hypothesized that inpatient use of activity aprons could potentially reduce or eliminate behaviors that result in self-harm, increased nursing supervision, and restraint use in an inpatient hospital setting. Methods: A single-center prospective randomized controlled pilot study was performed from July 2015 to November 2016 comparing activity apron plus standard care versus standard care alone. Consecutively enrolled patients were randomized by stratified randomization using age (cutoff: 80 years) and preexisting diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment. Primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of apron use. Secondary outcomes included duration of hospitalization postrandomization and individual nursing assignment (IA), time in restraints, nonphysical restraints use, falls, apron-related complications, dismissal destination, and 30-day hospital readmission. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled, with 13 randomized to apron and 17 randomized to the control group. There was no statistically significant reduction in mean length of hospital stay (15.8 vs 21.5 day; P = .40), duration of IA compared to non-apron control group (6.4 vs 9.1, respectively; P = .39), or antipsychotic medication use (61.5% vs 70.6% in control group; P = .60). No complications secondary to apron use were seen. Conclusions: Activity aprons are a safe addition to the standard of care when managing encephalopathic patients in the inpatient setting. These aprons may have a role as part of a comprehensive complement of interventions to address delirium and encephalopathy in hospitalized patients.

AB - Background: Activity aprons are commercially available products used to occupy patients with dementia at home or in longterm care facilities. We hypothesized that inpatient use of activity aprons could potentially reduce or eliminate behaviors that result in self-harm, increased nursing supervision, and restraint use in an inpatient hospital setting. Methods: A single-center prospective randomized controlled pilot study was performed from July 2015 to November 2016 comparing activity apron plus standard care versus standard care alone. Consecutively enrolled patients were randomized by stratified randomization using age (cutoff: 80 years) and preexisting diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment. Primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of apron use. Secondary outcomes included duration of hospitalization postrandomization and individual nursing assignment (IA), time in restraints, nonphysical restraints use, falls, apron-related complications, dismissal destination, and 30-day hospital readmission. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled, with 13 randomized to apron and 17 randomized to the control group. There was no statistically significant reduction in mean length of hospital stay (15.8 vs 21.5 day; P = .40), duration of IA compared to non-apron control group (6.4 vs 9.1, respectively; P = .39), or antipsychotic medication use (61.5% vs 70.6% in control group; P = .60). No complications secondary to apron use were seen. Conclusions: Activity aprons are a safe addition to the standard of care when managing encephalopathic patients in the inpatient setting. These aprons may have a role as part of a comprehensive complement of interventions to address delirium and encephalopathy in hospitalized patients.

KW - Activity apron

KW - Individual nursing assignment

KW - Length of hospitalization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063600270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063600270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1941874418773945

DO - 10.1177/1941874418773945

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063600270

VL - 8

SP - 183

EP - 187

JO - The Neurohospitalist

JF - The Neurohospitalist

SN - 1941-8744

IS - 4

ER -