ACR appropriateness Criteria® occupational lung diseases

Leon Bacchus, Rakesh D. Shah, Jonathan H. Chung, Traves P. Crabtree, Darel E. Heitkamp, Mark D. Iannettoni, Geoffrey B. Johnson, Clinton Jokerst, Barbara L. McComb, Anthony G. Saleh, Robert M. Steiner, Tan Lucien H. Mohammed, James G. Ravenel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Occupational lung disease is a category of disease entities characterized by a reaction of the lung parenchyma to inhaled aerosolized particles found in the environment. This document summarizes the imaging appropriateness data for silicosis, coal worker pneumoconiosis, and asbestosis. The main points of the document are that computed tomography is more sensitive than radiography, computed tomography without contrast generally suffices for evaluation, and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography may have utility in patients with mesothelioma. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence- based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review includes an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)W1-W3
JournalJournal of thoracic imaging
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Appropriateness Criteria
  • Asbestos
  • Occupational lung diseases
  • Pneumoconiosis
  • Silicosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'ACR appropriateness Criteria® occupational lung diseases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this