ACL surgery - The Pittsburgh experience

Michael K. Gilbart, Anikar Chhabra, Christopher D. Harner

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are currently more than 100,000 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions performed annually in the United States. The overall rate of success of ACL reconstruction in terms of restoration of stability, loss of sensation of giving way and relief of symptoms is reported between 75% and 90% in the literature. Approximately 8% of these patients have an unsatisfactory result due to recurrent instability and graft failure. An ACL reconstruction failure may consist of a combination of subjective factors of pain, instability, or stiffness as well as objective findings of laxity, progressive degenerative changes, or loss of motion. For many of those patients who experience a failure following an ACL reconstruction, revision ACL reconstruction is indicated to provide the patient with a stable knee, to prevent further injury to the cartilage and menisci, and to improve patient function. Operative considerations include the timing of the surgery, graft selection, and surgical technique. Other considerations include the treatment of combined instabilities, the treatment of pre-existing meniscal or articular pathology, and the necessity of performing any corrective limb realignment procedures. This article will discuss the mechanisms of failure of ACL reconstructions, will provide an approach to patients with ACL reconstruction failures, and will discuss the rationale for primary grafting and for staged revision surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-85
Number of pages7
JournalSports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Transplants
Reoperation
Cartilage
Knee
Extremities
Joints
Pathology
Pain
Wounds and Injuries
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • ACL reconstruction
  • ACL revision
  • Allograft
  • Autograft
  • Staged revision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

ACL surgery - The Pittsburgh experience. / Gilbart, Michael K.; Chhabra, Anikar; Harner, Christopher D.

In: Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2005, p. 79-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Gilbart, Michael K. ; Chhabra, Anikar ; Harner, Christopher D. / ACL surgery - The Pittsburgh experience. In: Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review. 2005 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 79-85.
@article{f583c1dcb4074e4eacd0b64f6e8461a8,
title = "ACL surgery - The Pittsburgh experience",
abstract = "There are currently more than 100,000 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions performed annually in the United States. The overall rate of success of ACL reconstruction in terms of restoration of stability, loss of sensation of giving way and relief of symptoms is reported between 75{\%} and 90{\%} in the literature. Approximately 8{\%} of these patients have an unsatisfactory result due to recurrent instability and graft failure. An ACL reconstruction failure may consist of a combination of subjective factors of pain, instability, or stiffness as well as objective findings of laxity, progressive degenerative changes, or loss of motion. For many of those patients who experience a failure following an ACL reconstruction, revision ACL reconstruction is indicated to provide the patient with a stable knee, to prevent further injury to the cartilage and menisci, and to improve patient function. Operative considerations include the timing of the surgery, graft selection, and surgical technique. Other considerations include the treatment of combined instabilities, the treatment of pre-existing meniscal or articular pathology, and the necessity of performing any corrective limb realignment procedures. This article will discuss the mechanisms of failure of ACL reconstructions, will provide an approach to patients with ACL reconstruction failures, and will discuss the rationale for primary grafting and for staged revision surgery.",
keywords = "ACL reconstruction, ACL revision, Allograft, Autograft, Staged revision",
author = "Gilbart, {Michael K.} and Anikar Chhabra and Harner, {Christopher D.}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1097/01.jsa.0000155846.62034.c6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "79--85",
journal = "Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review",
issn = "1062-8592",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACL surgery - The Pittsburgh experience

AU - Gilbart, Michael K.

AU - Chhabra, Anikar

AU - Harner, Christopher D.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - There are currently more than 100,000 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions performed annually in the United States. The overall rate of success of ACL reconstruction in terms of restoration of stability, loss of sensation of giving way and relief of symptoms is reported between 75% and 90% in the literature. Approximately 8% of these patients have an unsatisfactory result due to recurrent instability and graft failure. An ACL reconstruction failure may consist of a combination of subjective factors of pain, instability, or stiffness as well as objective findings of laxity, progressive degenerative changes, or loss of motion. For many of those patients who experience a failure following an ACL reconstruction, revision ACL reconstruction is indicated to provide the patient with a stable knee, to prevent further injury to the cartilage and menisci, and to improve patient function. Operative considerations include the timing of the surgery, graft selection, and surgical technique. Other considerations include the treatment of combined instabilities, the treatment of pre-existing meniscal or articular pathology, and the necessity of performing any corrective limb realignment procedures. This article will discuss the mechanisms of failure of ACL reconstructions, will provide an approach to patients with ACL reconstruction failures, and will discuss the rationale for primary grafting and for staged revision surgery.

AB - There are currently more than 100,000 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions performed annually in the United States. The overall rate of success of ACL reconstruction in terms of restoration of stability, loss of sensation of giving way and relief of symptoms is reported between 75% and 90% in the literature. Approximately 8% of these patients have an unsatisfactory result due to recurrent instability and graft failure. An ACL reconstruction failure may consist of a combination of subjective factors of pain, instability, or stiffness as well as objective findings of laxity, progressive degenerative changes, or loss of motion. For many of those patients who experience a failure following an ACL reconstruction, revision ACL reconstruction is indicated to provide the patient with a stable knee, to prevent further injury to the cartilage and menisci, and to improve patient function. Operative considerations include the timing of the surgery, graft selection, and surgical technique. Other considerations include the treatment of combined instabilities, the treatment of pre-existing meniscal or articular pathology, and the necessity of performing any corrective limb realignment procedures. This article will discuss the mechanisms of failure of ACL reconstructions, will provide an approach to patients with ACL reconstruction failures, and will discuss the rationale for primary grafting and for staged revision surgery.

KW - ACL reconstruction

KW - ACL revision

KW - Allograft

KW - Autograft

KW - Staged revision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20344369805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20344369805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.jsa.0000155846.62034.c6

DO - 10.1097/01.jsa.0000155846.62034.c6

M3 - Review article

VL - 13

SP - 79

EP - 85

JO - Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review

JF - Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review

SN - 1062-8592

IS - 2

ER -