Accuracy of real-time vsblinded offline diagnosis of neoplastic colorectal polyps using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: A pilot study

M. W. Shahid, A. M. Buchner, Massimo Raimondo, T. A. Woodward, M. Krishna, M. B. Wallace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and study aims: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is a new imaging modality that enables histological examination of gastrointestinal mucosa during endoscopic procedures. Most studies have evaluated offline interpretation of pCLE images. In clinical practice, real-time interpretation is necessary to assist decision-making during the procedure. The aim of this pilot study was to compare the accuracy of real-time pCLE diagnosis made during the procedure with that of blinded offline interpretation to provide accuracy estimates that will aid the planning of future studies. Patients and methods: pCLE was performed in patients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy. Once a polyp had been identified, one endoscopist analyzed pCLE images during the procedure and made a provisional "real-timeo" diagnosis. Saved video recordings were de-identified, randomized, and reviewed "offlineo" 1 month later by the same endoscopist, who was blinded to the original diagnoses. Results: Images from a total of 154 polyps were recorded (80 neoplastic, 74 non-neoplastic). The overall accuracy of real-time pCLE diagnosis (accuracy 79 %, sensitivity 81 %, specificity 76 %) and offline pCLE diagnosis (83 %, 88 %, and 77 %, respectively) for all 154 polyps were similar. Among polyps < 10 mm in size, the accuracy of real-time interpretation was significantly lower (accuracy 78 %, sensitivity 71 %, specificity 83 %) than that of offline pCLE interpretation (81 %, 86 %, 78 %, respectively). For polyps 10 mm, the accuracy of pCLE diagnosis in real-time was better (accuracy 85 %, sensitivity 90 %, specificity 75 %) than offline pCLE diagnosis (81 %, 97 %, and 50 %, respectively). Conclusions: These results suggest that real-time and offline interpretations of pCLE images are moderately accurate. Real-time interpretation is slightly less accurate than offline diagnosis, but overall both are comparable. Additionally, there was contrasting accuracy between the two methods for small and large polyps.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-348
Number of pages6
JournalEndoscopy
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Polyps
Lasers
Sensitivity and Specificity
Video Recording
Colonoscopy
Decision Making
Mucous Membrane

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Accuracy of real-time vsblinded offline diagnosis of neoplastic colorectal polyps using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy : A pilot study. / Shahid, M. W.; Buchner, A. M.; Raimondo, Massimo; Woodward, T. A.; Krishna, M.; Wallace, M. B.

In: Endoscopy, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2012, p. 343-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shahid, M. W. ; Buchner, A. M. ; Raimondo, Massimo ; Woodward, T. A. ; Krishna, M. ; Wallace, M. B. / Accuracy of real-time vsblinded offline diagnosis of neoplastic colorectal polyps using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy : A pilot study. In: Endoscopy. 2012 ; Vol. 44, No. 4. pp. 343-348.
@article{02af9a2f50aa4acabec7f2000b2eac7c,
title = "Accuracy of real-time vsblinded offline diagnosis of neoplastic colorectal polyps using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: A pilot study",
abstract = "Background and study aims: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is a new imaging modality that enables histological examination of gastrointestinal mucosa during endoscopic procedures. Most studies have evaluated offline interpretation of pCLE images. In clinical practice, real-time interpretation is necessary to assist decision-making during the procedure. The aim of this pilot study was to compare the accuracy of real-time pCLE diagnosis made during the procedure with that of blinded offline interpretation to provide accuracy estimates that will aid the planning of future studies. Patients and methods: pCLE was performed in patients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy. Once a polyp had been identified, one endoscopist analyzed pCLE images during the procedure and made a provisional {"}real-timeo{"} diagnosis. Saved video recordings were de-identified, randomized, and reviewed {"}offlineo{"} 1 month later by the same endoscopist, who was blinded to the original diagnoses. Results: Images from a total of 154 polyps were recorded (80 neoplastic, 74 non-neoplastic). The overall accuracy of real-time pCLE diagnosis (accuracy 79 {\%}, sensitivity 81 {\%}, specificity 76 {\%}) and offline pCLE diagnosis (83 {\%}, 88 {\%}, and 77 {\%}, respectively) for all 154 polyps were similar. Among polyps < 10 mm in size, the accuracy of real-time interpretation was significantly lower (accuracy 78 {\%}, sensitivity 71 {\%}, specificity 83 {\%}) than that of offline pCLE interpretation (81 {\%}, 86 {\%}, 78 {\%}, respectively). For polyps 10 mm, the accuracy of pCLE diagnosis in real-time was better (accuracy 85 {\%}, sensitivity 90 {\%}, specificity 75 {\%}) than offline pCLE diagnosis (81 {\%}, 97 {\%}, and 50 {\%}, respectively). Conclusions: These results suggest that real-time and offline interpretations of pCLE images are moderately accurate. Real-time interpretation is slightly less accurate than offline diagnosis, but overall both are comparable. Additionally, there was contrasting accuracy between the two methods for small and large polyps.",
author = "Shahid, {M. W.} and Buchner, {A. M.} and Massimo Raimondo and Woodward, {T. A.} and M. Krishna and Wallace, {M. B.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1055/s-0031-1291589",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "343--348",
journal = "Endoscopy",
issn = "0013-726X",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of real-time vsblinded offline diagnosis of neoplastic colorectal polyps using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Shahid, M. W.

AU - Buchner, A. M.

AU - Raimondo, Massimo

AU - Woodward, T. A.

AU - Krishna, M.

AU - Wallace, M. B.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Background and study aims: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is a new imaging modality that enables histological examination of gastrointestinal mucosa during endoscopic procedures. Most studies have evaluated offline interpretation of pCLE images. In clinical practice, real-time interpretation is necessary to assist decision-making during the procedure. The aim of this pilot study was to compare the accuracy of real-time pCLE diagnosis made during the procedure with that of blinded offline interpretation to provide accuracy estimates that will aid the planning of future studies. Patients and methods: pCLE was performed in patients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy. Once a polyp had been identified, one endoscopist analyzed pCLE images during the procedure and made a provisional "real-timeo" diagnosis. Saved video recordings were de-identified, randomized, and reviewed "offlineo" 1 month later by the same endoscopist, who was blinded to the original diagnoses. Results: Images from a total of 154 polyps were recorded (80 neoplastic, 74 non-neoplastic). The overall accuracy of real-time pCLE diagnosis (accuracy 79 %, sensitivity 81 %, specificity 76 %) and offline pCLE diagnosis (83 %, 88 %, and 77 %, respectively) for all 154 polyps were similar. Among polyps < 10 mm in size, the accuracy of real-time interpretation was significantly lower (accuracy 78 %, sensitivity 71 %, specificity 83 %) than that of offline pCLE interpretation (81 %, 86 %, 78 %, respectively). For polyps 10 mm, the accuracy of pCLE diagnosis in real-time was better (accuracy 85 %, sensitivity 90 %, specificity 75 %) than offline pCLE diagnosis (81 %, 97 %, and 50 %, respectively). Conclusions: These results suggest that real-time and offline interpretations of pCLE images are moderately accurate. Real-time interpretation is slightly less accurate than offline diagnosis, but overall both are comparable. Additionally, there was contrasting accuracy between the two methods for small and large polyps.

AB - Background and study aims: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is a new imaging modality that enables histological examination of gastrointestinal mucosa during endoscopic procedures. Most studies have evaluated offline interpretation of pCLE images. In clinical practice, real-time interpretation is necessary to assist decision-making during the procedure. The aim of this pilot study was to compare the accuracy of real-time pCLE diagnosis made during the procedure with that of blinded offline interpretation to provide accuracy estimates that will aid the planning of future studies. Patients and methods: pCLE was performed in patients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy. Once a polyp had been identified, one endoscopist analyzed pCLE images during the procedure and made a provisional "real-timeo" diagnosis. Saved video recordings were de-identified, randomized, and reviewed "offlineo" 1 month later by the same endoscopist, who was blinded to the original diagnoses. Results: Images from a total of 154 polyps were recorded (80 neoplastic, 74 non-neoplastic). The overall accuracy of real-time pCLE diagnosis (accuracy 79 %, sensitivity 81 %, specificity 76 %) and offline pCLE diagnosis (83 %, 88 %, and 77 %, respectively) for all 154 polyps were similar. Among polyps < 10 mm in size, the accuracy of real-time interpretation was significantly lower (accuracy 78 %, sensitivity 71 %, specificity 83 %) than that of offline pCLE interpretation (81 %, 86 %, 78 %, respectively). For polyps 10 mm, the accuracy of pCLE diagnosis in real-time was better (accuracy 85 %, sensitivity 90 %, specificity 75 %) than offline pCLE diagnosis (81 %, 97 %, and 50 %, respectively). Conclusions: These results suggest that real-time and offline interpretations of pCLE images are moderately accurate. Real-time interpretation is slightly less accurate than offline diagnosis, but overall both are comparable. Additionally, there was contrasting accuracy between the two methods for small and large polyps.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858796890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858796890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0031-1291589

DO - 10.1055/s-0031-1291589

M3 - Article

C2 - 22382851

AN - SCOPUS:84858796890

VL - 44

SP - 343

EP - 348

JO - Endoscopy

JF - Endoscopy

SN - 0013-726X

IS - 4

ER -