Accuracy and interobserver agreement of small-caliber vs. conventional esophagogastro-duodenoscopy for evaluating esophageal varices

Surakit Pungpapong, A. Keaveny, Massimo Raimondo, Rolland Dickson, T. Woodward, Denise Harnois, M. Wallace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and study aims: Advances in endoscope design have allowed high-quality imaging using small-caliber endoscopes (< 6mm), and these have been proposed as providing an accurate modality for evaluating esophageal varices in several small studies. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and interobserver agreement of small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) compared with conventional EGD for evaluating esophageal varices in a large prospective cohort. Patients and methods: A total of 115 patients with end-stage liver disease and/or portal hypertension were prospectively enrolled into the study. EGD procedures were performed using conventional (8.6-mm) and small-caliber (4.9-mm) endoscopes, back to back and under standard sedation, by two different endoscopists. Esophageal varices were graded at the time of EGD (the "real-time" grade); and by retrospective review of photographs by three endoscopists, when a "consensus" grade (i.e. a grading agreed by two out of the three endoscopists) was used as the final result. Results: Of the 115 patients, 33 patients (29%) were classified as Child's class A, 47 patients (41 %) as Child's class B, and 35 patients (30%) as Child's class C. The mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 13.6. Thirty-six patients (31 %) had undergone previous ligation of esophageal varices. Compared with conventional EGD, the accuracy of small-caliber EGD for esophageal varices grading was 94% (consensus grade) and 95% (real-time grade). Excellent concordance was demonstrated between real-time grade and consensus grade, with a kappa of 0.95 for both types of EGD. There was excellent interobserver agreement between endoscopists, regardless of the type of EGD. The severity of hepatic dysfunction and the presence or absence of a history of previous esophageal varices ligation did not have any impact on the accuracy or interobserver agreement. Conclusions: Small-caliber EGD performed under sedation via oral intubation is a highly accurate and reliable modality for evaluating esophageal varices in patients with end-stage liver disease and/or portal hypertension, regardless of the degree of hepatic dysfunction or history of previous esophageal varices ligation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)673-678
Number of pages6
JournalEndoscopy
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

Duodenoscopy
Digestive System Endoscopy
Esophageal and Gastric Varices
End Stage Liver Disease
Endoscopes
Ligation
Portal Hypertension
Liver
Intubation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{38ab193b45514227ad92ee2b105d3704,
title = "Accuracy and interobserver agreement of small-caliber vs. conventional esophagogastro-duodenoscopy for evaluating esophageal varices",
abstract = "Background and study aims: Advances in endoscope design have allowed high-quality imaging using small-caliber endoscopes (< 6mm), and these have been proposed as providing an accurate modality for evaluating esophageal varices in several small studies. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and interobserver agreement of small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) compared with conventional EGD for evaluating esophageal varices in a large prospective cohort. Patients and methods: A total of 115 patients with end-stage liver disease and/or portal hypertension were prospectively enrolled into the study. EGD procedures were performed using conventional (8.6-mm) and small-caliber (4.9-mm) endoscopes, back to back and under standard sedation, by two different endoscopists. Esophageal varices were graded at the time of EGD (the {"}real-time{"} grade); and by retrospective review of photographs by three endoscopists, when a {"}consensus{"} grade (i.e. a grading agreed by two out of the three endoscopists) was used as the final result. Results: Of the 115 patients, 33 patients (29{\%}) were classified as Child's class A, 47 patients (41 {\%}) as Child's class B, and 35 patients (30{\%}) as Child's class C. The mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 13.6. Thirty-six patients (31 {\%}) had undergone previous ligation of esophageal varices. Compared with conventional EGD, the accuracy of small-caliber EGD for esophageal varices grading was 94{\%} (consensus grade) and 95{\%} (real-time grade). Excellent concordance was demonstrated between real-time grade and consensus grade, with a kappa of 0.95 for both types of EGD. There was excellent interobserver agreement between endoscopists, regardless of the type of EGD. The severity of hepatic dysfunction and the presence or absence of a history of previous esophageal varices ligation did not have any impact on the accuracy or interobserver agreement. Conclusions: Small-caliber EGD performed under sedation via oral intubation is a highly accurate and reliable modality for evaluating esophageal varices in patients with end-stage liver disease and/or portal hypertension, regardless of the degree of hepatic dysfunction or history of previous esophageal varices ligation.",
author = "Surakit Pungpapong and A. Keaveny and Massimo Raimondo and Rolland Dickson and T. Woodward and Denise Harnois and M. Wallace",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1055/s-2007-966351",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "673--678",
journal = "Endoscopy",
issn = "0013-726X",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy and interobserver agreement of small-caliber vs. conventional esophagogastro-duodenoscopy for evaluating esophageal varices

AU - Pungpapong, Surakit

AU - Keaveny, A.

AU - Raimondo, Massimo

AU - Dickson, Rolland

AU - Woodward, T.

AU - Harnois, Denise

AU - Wallace, M.

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - Background and study aims: Advances in endoscope design have allowed high-quality imaging using small-caliber endoscopes (< 6mm), and these have been proposed as providing an accurate modality for evaluating esophageal varices in several small studies. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and interobserver agreement of small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) compared with conventional EGD for evaluating esophageal varices in a large prospective cohort. Patients and methods: A total of 115 patients with end-stage liver disease and/or portal hypertension were prospectively enrolled into the study. EGD procedures were performed using conventional (8.6-mm) and small-caliber (4.9-mm) endoscopes, back to back and under standard sedation, by two different endoscopists. Esophageal varices were graded at the time of EGD (the "real-time" grade); and by retrospective review of photographs by three endoscopists, when a "consensus" grade (i.e. a grading agreed by two out of the three endoscopists) was used as the final result. Results: Of the 115 patients, 33 patients (29%) were classified as Child's class A, 47 patients (41 %) as Child's class B, and 35 patients (30%) as Child's class C. The mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 13.6. Thirty-six patients (31 %) had undergone previous ligation of esophageal varices. Compared with conventional EGD, the accuracy of small-caliber EGD for esophageal varices grading was 94% (consensus grade) and 95% (real-time grade). Excellent concordance was demonstrated between real-time grade and consensus grade, with a kappa of 0.95 for both types of EGD. There was excellent interobserver agreement between endoscopists, regardless of the type of EGD. The severity of hepatic dysfunction and the presence or absence of a history of previous esophageal varices ligation did not have any impact on the accuracy or interobserver agreement. Conclusions: Small-caliber EGD performed under sedation via oral intubation is a highly accurate and reliable modality for evaluating esophageal varices in patients with end-stage liver disease and/or portal hypertension, regardless of the degree of hepatic dysfunction or history of previous esophageal varices ligation.

AB - Background and study aims: Advances in endoscope design have allowed high-quality imaging using small-caliber endoscopes (< 6mm), and these have been proposed as providing an accurate modality for evaluating esophageal varices in several small studies. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and interobserver agreement of small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) compared with conventional EGD for evaluating esophageal varices in a large prospective cohort. Patients and methods: A total of 115 patients with end-stage liver disease and/or portal hypertension were prospectively enrolled into the study. EGD procedures were performed using conventional (8.6-mm) and small-caliber (4.9-mm) endoscopes, back to back and under standard sedation, by two different endoscopists. Esophageal varices were graded at the time of EGD (the "real-time" grade); and by retrospective review of photographs by three endoscopists, when a "consensus" grade (i.e. a grading agreed by two out of the three endoscopists) was used as the final result. Results: Of the 115 patients, 33 patients (29%) were classified as Child's class A, 47 patients (41 %) as Child's class B, and 35 patients (30%) as Child's class C. The mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 13.6. Thirty-six patients (31 %) had undergone previous ligation of esophageal varices. Compared with conventional EGD, the accuracy of small-caliber EGD for esophageal varices grading was 94% (consensus grade) and 95% (real-time grade). Excellent concordance was demonstrated between real-time grade and consensus grade, with a kappa of 0.95 for both types of EGD. There was excellent interobserver agreement between endoscopists, regardless of the type of EGD. The severity of hepatic dysfunction and the presence or absence of a history of previous esophageal varices ligation did not have any impact on the accuracy or interobserver agreement. Conclusions: Small-caliber EGD performed under sedation via oral intubation is a highly accurate and reliable modality for evaluating esophageal varices in patients with end-stage liver disease and/or portal hypertension, regardless of the degree of hepatic dysfunction or history of previous esophageal varices ligation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548032174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548032174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-2007-966351

DO - 10.1055/s-2007-966351

M3 - Article

C2 - 17583856

AN - SCOPUS:34548032174

VL - 39

SP - 673

EP - 678

JO - Endoscopy

JF - Endoscopy

SN - 0013-726X

IS - 8

ER -