Absolutely no hope? Some ambiguity of futility of care in devastating acute stroke

E. F M Wijdicks, Alejandro Rabinstein

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Devastating stroke can produce irreversible brain damage of massive proportions. In those patients, continuation of aggressive medical or surgical care may be futile and may unnecessarily prolong the suffering of families. Therefore, it is essential for clinicians to be aware of key clinical and radiologic features predictive of poor outcome. There has not been a critical review of the data used to make decisions of withdrawal of care in patients with severe strokes. Data Source: Literature review. Data Synthesis: Although in many instances the studies that validate these prognosticators represent class III or class IV evidence, there are several clinico-radiologic profiles that have consistently been predictive of mortality or dependency after cerebrovascular catastrophes. Conclusions: Inconclusiveness remains in the determination of futility of care after major stroke. However, predictors of dismal outcome after several types of stroke have been identified and are relevant information in regard to withdrawal of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2332-2342
Number of pages11
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume32
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hope
Medical Futility
Stroke
Information Storage and Retrieval
Psychological Stress
Patient Care
Mortality
Brain

Keywords

  • Futility
  • Hemorrhage
  • Intensive care unit outcome
  • Resuscitation
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Absolutely no hope? Some ambiguity of futility of care in devastating acute stroke. / Wijdicks, E. F M; Rabinstein, Alejandro.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 11, 01.11.2004, p. 2332-2342.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{2ee66ef586bd42668a5022c4bdaf68ac,
title = "Absolutely no hope? Some ambiguity of futility of care in devastating acute stroke",
abstract = "Objective: Devastating stroke can produce irreversible brain damage of massive proportions. In those patients, continuation of aggressive medical or surgical care may be futile and may unnecessarily prolong the suffering of families. Therefore, it is essential for clinicians to be aware of key clinical and radiologic features predictive of poor outcome. There has not been a critical review of the data used to make decisions of withdrawal of care in patients with severe strokes. Data Source: Literature review. Data Synthesis: Although in many instances the studies that validate these prognosticators represent class III or class IV evidence, there are several clinico-radiologic profiles that have consistently been predictive of mortality or dependency after cerebrovascular catastrophes. Conclusions: Inconclusiveness remains in the determination of futility of care after major stroke. However, predictors of dismal outcome after several types of stroke have been identified and are relevant information in regard to withdrawal of care.",
keywords = "Futility, Hemorrhage, Intensive care unit outcome, Resuscitation, Stroke",
author = "Wijdicks, {E. F M} and Alejandro Rabinstein",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.CCM.0000145949.34618.E1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "2332--2342",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absolutely no hope? Some ambiguity of futility of care in devastating acute stroke

AU - Wijdicks, E. F M

AU - Rabinstein, Alejandro

PY - 2004/11/1

Y1 - 2004/11/1

N2 - Objective: Devastating stroke can produce irreversible brain damage of massive proportions. In those patients, continuation of aggressive medical or surgical care may be futile and may unnecessarily prolong the suffering of families. Therefore, it is essential for clinicians to be aware of key clinical and radiologic features predictive of poor outcome. There has not been a critical review of the data used to make decisions of withdrawal of care in patients with severe strokes. Data Source: Literature review. Data Synthesis: Although in many instances the studies that validate these prognosticators represent class III or class IV evidence, there are several clinico-radiologic profiles that have consistently been predictive of mortality or dependency after cerebrovascular catastrophes. Conclusions: Inconclusiveness remains in the determination of futility of care after major stroke. However, predictors of dismal outcome after several types of stroke have been identified and are relevant information in regard to withdrawal of care.

AB - Objective: Devastating stroke can produce irreversible brain damage of massive proportions. In those patients, continuation of aggressive medical or surgical care may be futile and may unnecessarily prolong the suffering of families. Therefore, it is essential for clinicians to be aware of key clinical and radiologic features predictive of poor outcome. There has not been a critical review of the data used to make decisions of withdrawal of care in patients with severe strokes. Data Source: Literature review. Data Synthesis: Although in many instances the studies that validate these prognosticators represent class III or class IV evidence, there are several clinico-radiologic profiles that have consistently been predictive of mortality or dependency after cerebrovascular catastrophes. Conclusions: Inconclusiveness remains in the determination of futility of care after major stroke. However, predictors of dismal outcome after several types of stroke have been identified and are relevant information in regard to withdrawal of care.

KW - Futility

KW - Hemorrhage

KW - Intensive care unit outcome

KW - Resuscitation

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8544263850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8544263850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.CCM.0000145949.34618.E1

DO - 10.1097/01.CCM.0000145949.34618.E1

M3 - Review article

VL - 32

SP - 2332

EP - 2342

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 11

ER -