Abdominal CT: Comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients

Yoshiko Sagara, Amy K. Hara, William Pavlicek, Alvin C Silva, Robert G. Paden, Qing Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

295 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to retrospectively compare radiation dose, noise, and image quality of abdominal low-dose CT reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) and routine-dose CT reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-three patients (37 men and 16 women; mean age, 60.8 years) underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal low-dose CT with 40% ASIR. All 53 patients had previously undergone contrast-enhanced routine-dose CT with FBP. With the scanning techniques masked, two radiologists independently graded images for sharpness, image noise, diagnostic acceptability, and artifacts. Quantitative measures of radiation dose and image noise were also obtained. All results were compared on the basis of body mass index (BMI). RESULTS. The volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product, and radiation dose for low-dose CT with ASIR were 17 mGy, 860 mGy, and 13 mSv, respectively, compared with 25 mGy, 1,193 mGy, and 18 mSv for routine-dose CT with FBP, representing an approximate overall dose reduction of 33%. Low-dose CT with ASIR had significantly reduced (p < 0.001) quantitative and qualitative assessment of image noise. Image sharpness, however, was significantly reduced for low-dose CT with ASIR (p < 0.001), although diagnostic acceptability and artifact scores were nearly identical to those for routine-dose CT with FBP. The average CTDIvol dose reduction was 66% for patients with a BMI of less than 20 and 23% for patients with a BMI of 25 or greater. CONCLUSION. Compared with routine-dose CT with FBP, abdominal low-dose CT with ASIR significantly reduces noise, thereby permitting diagnostic abdominal examinations with lower (by 23-66%) radiation doses. Despite reduced image sharpness in average and small patients, low-dose CT with ASIR had diagnostic acceptability comparable to that of routine-dose CT with FBP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)713-719
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume195
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Radiation
Body Mass Index
Artifacts
Noise
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Radiologists

Keywords

  • CT
  • Iterative reconstruction
  • Radiation dose

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Abdominal CT : Comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. / Sagara, Yoshiko; Hara, Amy K.; Pavlicek, William; Silva, Alvin C; Paden, Robert G.; Wu, Qing.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 195, No. 3, 09.2010, p. 713-719.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1ce72d73323743189ef0a2d42a1e4987,
title = "Abdominal CT: Comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to retrospectively compare radiation dose, noise, and image quality of abdominal low-dose CT reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) and routine-dose CT reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-three patients (37 men and 16 women; mean age, 60.8 years) underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal low-dose CT with 40{\%} ASIR. All 53 patients had previously undergone contrast-enhanced routine-dose CT with FBP. With the scanning techniques masked, two radiologists independently graded images for sharpness, image noise, diagnostic acceptability, and artifacts. Quantitative measures of radiation dose and image noise were also obtained. All results were compared on the basis of body mass index (BMI). RESULTS. The volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product, and radiation dose for low-dose CT with ASIR were 17 mGy, 860 mGy, and 13 mSv, respectively, compared with 25 mGy, 1,193 mGy, and 18 mSv for routine-dose CT with FBP, representing an approximate overall dose reduction of 33{\%}. Low-dose CT with ASIR had significantly reduced (p < 0.001) quantitative and qualitative assessment of image noise. Image sharpness, however, was significantly reduced for low-dose CT with ASIR (p < 0.001), although diagnostic acceptability and artifact scores were nearly identical to those for routine-dose CT with FBP. The average CTDIvol dose reduction was 66{\%} for patients with a BMI of less than 20 and 23{\%} for patients with a BMI of 25 or greater. CONCLUSION. Compared with routine-dose CT with FBP, abdominal low-dose CT with ASIR significantly reduces noise, thereby permitting diagnostic abdominal examinations with lower (by 23-66{\%}) radiation doses. Despite reduced image sharpness in average and small patients, low-dose CT with ASIR had diagnostic acceptability comparable to that of routine-dose CT with FBP.",
keywords = "CT, Iterative reconstruction, Radiation dose",
author = "Yoshiko Sagara and Hara, {Amy K.} and William Pavlicek and Silva, {Alvin C} and Paden, {Robert G.} and Qing Wu",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.09.2989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "195",
pages = "713--719",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Abdominal CT

T2 - Comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients

AU - Sagara, Yoshiko

AU - Hara, Amy K.

AU - Pavlicek, William

AU - Silva, Alvin C

AU - Paden, Robert G.

AU - Wu, Qing

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to retrospectively compare radiation dose, noise, and image quality of abdominal low-dose CT reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) and routine-dose CT reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-three patients (37 men and 16 women; mean age, 60.8 years) underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal low-dose CT with 40% ASIR. All 53 patients had previously undergone contrast-enhanced routine-dose CT with FBP. With the scanning techniques masked, two radiologists independently graded images for sharpness, image noise, diagnostic acceptability, and artifacts. Quantitative measures of radiation dose and image noise were also obtained. All results were compared on the basis of body mass index (BMI). RESULTS. The volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product, and radiation dose for low-dose CT with ASIR were 17 mGy, 860 mGy, and 13 mSv, respectively, compared with 25 mGy, 1,193 mGy, and 18 mSv for routine-dose CT with FBP, representing an approximate overall dose reduction of 33%. Low-dose CT with ASIR had significantly reduced (p < 0.001) quantitative and qualitative assessment of image noise. Image sharpness, however, was significantly reduced for low-dose CT with ASIR (p < 0.001), although diagnostic acceptability and artifact scores were nearly identical to those for routine-dose CT with FBP. The average CTDIvol dose reduction was 66% for patients with a BMI of less than 20 and 23% for patients with a BMI of 25 or greater. CONCLUSION. Compared with routine-dose CT with FBP, abdominal low-dose CT with ASIR significantly reduces noise, thereby permitting diagnostic abdominal examinations with lower (by 23-66%) radiation doses. Despite reduced image sharpness in average and small patients, low-dose CT with ASIR had diagnostic acceptability comparable to that of routine-dose CT with FBP.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to retrospectively compare radiation dose, noise, and image quality of abdominal low-dose CT reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) and routine-dose CT reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-three patients (37 men and 16 women; mean age, 60.8 years) underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal low-dose CT with 40% ASIR. All 53 patients had previously undergone contrast-enhanced routine-dose CT with FBP. With the scanning techniques masked, two radiologists independently graded images for sharpness, image noise, diagnostic acceptability, and artifacts. Quantitative measures of radiation dose and image noise were also obtained. All results were compared on the basis of body mass index (BMI). RESULTS. The volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product, and radiation dose for low-dose CT with ASIR were 17 mGy, 860 mGy, and 13 mSv, respectively, compared with 25 mGy, 1,193 mGy, and 18 mSv for routine-dose CT with FBP, representing an approximate overall dose reduction of 33%. Low-dose CT with ASIR had significantly reduced (p < 0.001) quantitative and qualitative assessment of image noise. Image sharpness, however, was significantly reduced for low-dose CT with ASIR (p < 0.001), although diagnostic acceptability and artifact scores were nearly identical to those for routine-dose CT with FBP. The average CTDIvol dose reduction was 66% for patients with a BMI of less than 20 and 23% for patients with a BMI of 25 or greater. CONCLUSION. Compared with routine-dose CT with FBP, abdominal low-dose CT with ASIR significantly reduces noise, thereby permitting diagnostic abdominal examinations with lower (by 23-66%) radiation doses. Despite reduced image sharpness in average and small patients, low-dose CT with ASIR had diagnostic acceptability comparable to that of routine-dose CT with FBP.

KW - CT

KW - Iterative reconstruction

KW - Radiation dose

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956841482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956841482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.09.2989

DO - 10.2214/AJR.09.2989

M3 - Article

C2 - 20729451

AN - SCOPUS:77956841482

VL - 195

SP - 713

EP - 719

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 3

ER -