A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: Many informative elements missing

David Allan Cook, Thomas J. Beckman, Georges Bordage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Informative titles and abstracts facilitate reading and searching the literature. Objective: To evaluate the quality of titles and abstracts of full-length reports of experimental studies in medical education. Methods: We used a random sample of 110 articles (of 185 eligible articles) describing education experiments. Articles were published in 2003 and 2004 in Academic Medicine, Advances in Health Sciences Education, American Journal of Surgery, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Medical Education and Teaching and Learning in Medicine. Titles were categorised as informative, indicative, neither, or both. Abstracts were evaluated for the presence of a rationale, objective, descriptions of study design, setting, participants, study intervention and comparison group, main outcomes, results and conclusions. Results: Of the 105 articles suitable for review, 86 (82%) had an indicative title and 10 (10%) had a title that was both indicative and informative. A rationale was present in 66 abstracts (63%), objectives were present in 84 (80%), descriptions of study design in 20 (19%), setting in 29 (28%), and number and stage of training of participants in 42 (40%). The study intervention was defined in 55 (52%) abstracts. Among the 48 studies with a control or comparison group, this group was defined in 21 abstracts (44%). Study outcomes were defined in 64 abstracts (61%). Data were presented in 48 (46%) abstracts. Conclusions were presented in 97 abstracts (92%). Conclusions: Reports of experimental studies in medical education frequently lack the essential elements of informative titles and abstracts. More informative reporting is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1074-1081
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Education
Volume41
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Medical Education
Medicine
medicine
education
Internal Medicine
Health Education
Reading
Teaching
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Learning
Group
Education
health science
random sample
surgery
lack
experiment
learning

Keywords

  • *education, medical
  • *research
  • Journalism, medical/*standards
  • Research design
  • Review [publication type]

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Education
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education : Many informative elements missing. / Cook, David Allan; Beckman, Thomas J.; Bordage, Georges.

In: Medical Education, Vol. 41, No. 11, 11.2007, p. 1074-1081.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{99c28a0bf61c43c8b3a9250a346ebbe4,
title = "A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: Many informative elements missing",
abstract = "Context: Informative titles and abstracts facilitate reading and searching the literature. Objective: To evaluate the quality of titles and abstracts of full-length reports of experimental studies in medical education. Methods: We used a random sample of 110 articles (of 185 eligible articles) describing education experiments. Articles were published in 2003 and 2004 in Academic Medicine, Advances in Health Sciences Education, American Journal of Surgery, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Medical Education and Teaching and Learning in Medicine. Titles were categorised as informative, indicative, neither, or both. Abstracts were evaluated for the presence of a rationale, objective, descriptions of study design, setting, participants, study intervention and comparison group, main outcomes, results and conclusions. Results: Of the 105 articles suitable for review, 86 (82{\%}) had an indicative title and 10 (10{\%}) had a title that was both indicative and informative. A rationale was present in 66 abstracts (63{\%}), objectives were present in 84 (80{\%}), descriptions of study design in 20 (19{\%}), setting in 29 (28{\%}), and number and stage of training of participants in 42 (40{\%}). The study intervention was defined in 55 (52{\%}) abstracts. Among the 48 studies with a control or comparison group, this group was defined in 21 abstracts (44{\%}). Study outcomes were defined in 64 abstracts (61{\%}). Data were presented in 48 (46{\%}) abstracts. Conclusions were presented in 97 abstracts (92{\%}). Conclusions: Reports of experimental studies in medical education frequently lack the essential elements of informative titles and abstracts. More informative reporting is needed.",
keywords = "*education, medical, *research, Journalism, medical/*standards, Research design, Review [publication type]",
author = "Cook, {David Allan} and Beckman, {Thomas J.} and Georges Bordage",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02861.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "1074--1081",
journal = "Medical Education",
issn = "0308-0110",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education

T2 - Many informative elements missing

AU - Cook, David Allan

AU - Beckman, Thomas J.

AU - Bordage, Georges

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Context: Informative titles and abstracts facilitate reading and searching the literature. Objective: To evaluate the quality of titles and abstracts of full-length reports of experimental studies in medical education. Methods: We used a random sample of 110 articles (of 185 eligible articles) describing education experiments. Articles were published in 2003 and 2004 in Academic Medicine, Advances in Health Sciences Education, American Journal of Surgery, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Medical Education and Teaching and Learning in Medicine. Titles were categorised as informative, indicative, neither, or both. Abstracts were evaluated for the presence of a rationale, objective, descriptions of study design, setting, participants, study intervention and comparison group, main outcomes, results and conclusions. Results: Of the 105 articles suitable for review, 86 (82%) had an indicative title and 10 (10%) had a title that was both indicative and informative. A rationale was present in 66 abstracts (63%), objectives were present in 84 (80%), descriptions of study design in 20 (19%), setting in 29 (28%), and number and stage of training of participants in 42 (40%). The study intervention was defined in 55 (52%) abstracts. Among the 48 studies with a control or comparison group, this group was defined in 21 abstracts (44%). Study outcomes were defined in 64 abstracts (61%). Data were presented in 48 (46%) abstracts. Conclusions were presented in 97 abstracts (92%). Conclusions: Reports of experimental studies in medical education frequently lack the essential elements of informative titles and abstracts. More informative reporting is needed.

AB - Context: Informative titles and abstracts facilitate reading and searching the literature. Objective: To evaluate the quality of titles and abstracts of full-length reports of experimental studies in medical education. Methods: We used a random sample of 110 articles (of 185 eligible articles) describing education experiments. Articles were published in 2003 and 2004 in Academic Medicine, Advances in Health Sciences Education, American Journal of Surgery, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Medical Education and Teaching and Learning in Medicine. Titles were categorised as informative, indicative, neither, or both. Abstracts were evaluated for the presence of a rationale, objective, descriptions of study design, setting, participants, study intervention and comparison group, main outcomes, results and conclusions. Results: Of the 105 articles suitable for review, 86 (82%) had an indicative title and 10 (10%) had a title that was both indicative and informative. A rationale was present in 66 abstracts (63%), objectives were present in 84 (80%), descriptions of study design in 20 (19%), setting in 29 (28%), and number and stage of training of participants in 42 (40%). The study intervention was defined in 55 (52%) abstracts. Among the 48 studies with a control or comparison group, this group was defined in 21 abstracts (44%). Study outcomes were defined in 64 abstracts (61%). Data were presented in 48 (46%) abstracts. Conclusions were presented in 97 abstracts (92%). Conclusions: Reports of experimental studies in medical education frequently lack the essential elements of informative titles and abstracts. More informative reporting is needed.

KW - education, medical

KW - research

KW - Journalism, medical/standards

KW - Research design

KW - Review [publication type]

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35649021876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35649021876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02861.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02861.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 17973768

AN - SCOPUS:35649021876

VL - 41

SP - 1074

EP - 1081

JO - Medical Education

JF - Medical Education

SN - 0308-0110

IS - 11

ER -