A Survey of Patient and Partner Outcome and Treatment Preferences in Mild Cognitive Impairment

Glenn E. Smith, Melanie J. Chandler, Julie A Fields, Jeremiah Aakre, Dona E Locke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The patient-centered movement in health care is increasing efforts to design studies and interventions that address the outcomes that matter most to patients and their families. Research has not adequately addressed Alzheimer's disease patient and caregiver preferences. Objective: To survey the outcome and treatment preferences of patients and caregivers who had completed a multicomponent behavioral intervention for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: Extending prior work, we conducted an online survey regarding outcome and intervention preferences. Participants were patients with MCI and partners who completed the HABIT Healthy Action to Benefit Independence & Thinking ® program. Results: Both patient and partner respondents ranked patient quality of life as the highest priority, followed by patient self-efficacy, functional status, patient mood, and patient memory performance. Distressing behaviors and caregiver outcomes (burden, mood, and self-efficacy) had low rankings. Regarding the importance of HABIT ® program components, memory compensation training was ranked highest and wellness education lowest by all groups. Conclusion: Additional research should compare patient preference for patient reported outcomes, traditional neuropsychological and clinician outcomes, and modern biomarker outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1459-1468
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Alzheimer's Disease
Volume63
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Patient Preference
Caregivers
Self Efficacy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Cognitive Dysfunction
Research
Alzheimer Disease
Biomarkers
Quality of Life
Learning
Delivery of Health Care
Education

Keywords

  • Behavioral intervention
  • caregiver
  • daily function
  • mild cognitive impairment
  • patient preference
  • quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

A Survey of Patient and Partner Outcome and Treatment Preferences in Mild Cognitive Impairment. / Smith, Glenn E.; Chandler, Melanie J.; Fields, Julie A; Aakre, Jeremiah; Locke, Dona E.

In: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, Vol. 63, No. 4, 01.01.2018, p. 1459-1468.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{44b7babbfcc7470a9f4120f8d0bef9ad,
title = "A Survey of Patient and Partner Outcome and Treatment Preferences in Mild Cognitive Impairment",
abstract = "Background: The patient-centered movement in health care is increasing efforts to design studies and interventions that address the outcomes that matter most to patients and their families. Research has not adequately addressed Alzheimer's disease patient and caregiver preferences. Objective: To survey the outcome and treatment preferences of patients and caregivers who had completed a multicomponent behavioral intervention for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: Extending prior work, we conducted an online survey regarding outcome and intervention preferences. Participants were patients with MCI and partners who completed the HABIT Healthy Action to Benefit Independence & Thinking {\circledR} program. Results: Both patient and partner respondents ranked patient quality of life as the highest priority, followed by patient self-efficacy, functional status, patient mood, and patient memory performance. Distressing behaviors and caregiver outcomes (burden, mood, and self-efficacy) had low rankings. Regarding the importance of HABIT {\circledR} program components, memory compensation training was ranked highest and wellness education lowest by all groups. Conclusion: Additional research should compare patient preference for patient reported outcomes, traditional neuropsychological and clinician outcomes, and modern biomarker outcomes.",
keywords = "Behavioral intervention, caregiver, daily function, mild cognitive impairment, patient preference, quality of life",
author = "Smith, {Glenn E.} and Chandler, {Melanie J.} and Fields, {Julie A} and Jeremiah Aakre and Locke, {Dona E}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3233/JAD-171161",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "1459--1468",
journal = "Journal of Alzheimer's Disease",
issn = "1387-2877",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Survey of Patient and Partner Outcome and Treatment Preferences in Mild Cognitive Impairment

AU - Smith, Glenn E.

AU - Chandler, Melanie J.

AU - Fields, Julie A

AU - Aakre, Jeremiah

AU - Locke, Dona E

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: The patient-centered movement in health care is increasing efforts to design studies and interventions that address the outcomes that matter most to patients and their families. Research has not adequately addressed Alzheimer's disease patient and caregiver preferences. Objective: To survey the outcome and treatment preferences of patients and caregivers who had completed a multicomponent behavioral intervention for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: Extending prior work, we conducted an online survey regarding outcome and intervention preferences. Participants were patients with MCI and partners who completed the HABIT Healthy Action to Benefit Independence & Thinking ® program. Results: Both patient and partner respondents ranked patient quality of life as the highest priority, followed by patient self-efficacy, functional status, patient mood, and patient memory performance. Distressing behaviors and caregiver outcomes (burden, mood, and self-efficacy) had low rankings. Regarding the importance of HABIT ® program components, memory compensation training was ranked highest and wellness education lowest by all groups. Conclusion: Additional research should compare patient preference for patient reported outcomes, traditional neuropsychological and clinician outcomes, and modern biomarker outcomes.

AB - Background: The patient-centered movement in health care is increasing efforts to design studies and interventions that address the outcomes that matter most to patients and their families. Research has not adequately addressed Alzheimer's disease patient and caregiver preferences. Objective: To survey the outcome and treatment preferences of patients and caregivers who had completed a multicomponent behavioral intervention for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: Extending prior work, we conducted an online survey regarding outcome and intervention preferences. Participants were patients with MCI and partners who completed the HABIT Healthy Action to Benefit Independence & Thinking ® program. Results: Both patient and partner respondents ranked patient quality of life as the highest priority, followed by patient self-efficacy, functional status, patient mood, and patient memory performance. Distressing behaviors and caregiver outcomes (burden, mood, and self-efficacy) had low rankings. Regarding the importance of HABIT ® program components, memory compensation training was ranked highest and wellness education lowest by all groups. Conclusion: Additional research should compare patient preference for patient reported outcomes, traditional neuropsychological and clinician outcomes, and modern biomarker outcomes.

KW - Behavioral intervention

KW - caregiver

KW - daily function

KW - mild cognitive impairment

KW - patient preference

KW - quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048640444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048640444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/JAD-171161

DO - 10.3233/JAD-171161

M3 - Article

C2 - 29843239

AN - SCOPUS:85048640444

VL - 63

SP - 1459

EP - 1468

JO - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

JF - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

SN - 1387-2877

IS - 4

ER -