A survey of local preclinical and clinical medical students' attitudes towards radiology

Lynette L S Teo, Sudhakar K Venkatesh, Poh Sun Goh, Vincent F H Chong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: This study compares the attitudes between preclinical and clinical medical students towards radiology, following the introduction of a new radiology curriculum for 1st year students. Materials and Methods: Revision of the 1st year medical school curriculum for the academic year of 2008/9 with the inclusion of 13 one-hour formal radiology lectures integrated with each body system was done in an undergraduate Southeast Asian medical school. In the old curriculum, 1st and 2nd year medical students are not exposed to radiology. They received limited radiology teaching in their 3rd and 5th years with 2 one-hour lectures as part of their medicine and surgery rotations. In the 4th year, they have a one week non-examinable posting in radiology. A survey was administered to preclinical (new curriculum) and clinical (old curriculum) students. Survey responses were tabulated and attitudes between preclinical and clinical students were compared. Results: More than half of the preclinical students (155 out of 270 students, 59%) and 90 out of 720 clinical students (12.5%) responded. Students exposed to the new curriculum had attended one or two dedicated radiology lectures and were considering radiology as a clinical elective. Both groups of students did not feel familiar with radiology as with other specialties, were not considering radiology as a career, but felt that radiology was interesting and important to the overall practice of medicine. Conclusions: Exposure of 1st year students to radiology increases their interest in the subject. Further intervention, fi ne-tuning of the curriculum and follow-up surveys will be carried out to see if this interest persists throughout their clinical years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)692-695
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore
Volume39
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Students
Radiology
Curriculum
Students
Medical Schools
Surveys and Questionnaires
Medicine
Teaching

Keywords

  • Curriculum
  • Medical schoo1
  • Undergraduate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A survey of local preclinical and clinical medical students' attitudes towards radiology. / Teo, Lynette L S; Venkatesh, Sudhakar K; Goh, Poh Sun; Chong, Vincent F H.

In: Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, Vol. 39, No. 9, 09.2010, p. 692-695.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c71f1e6a0271458f88fb1d1e6b1f49ef,
title = "A survey of local preclinical and clinical medical students' attitudes towards radiology",
abstract = "Introduction: This study compares the attitudes between preclinical and clinical medical students towards radiology, following the introduction of a new radiology curriculum for 1st year students. Materials and Methods: Revision of the 1st year medical school curriculum for the academic year of 2008/9 with the inclusion of 13 one-hour formal radiology lectures integrated with each body system was done in an undergraduate Southeast Asian medical school. In the old curriculum, 1st and 2nd year medical students are not exposed to radiology. They received limited radiology teaching in their 3rd and 5th years with 2 one-hour lectures as part of their medicine and surgery rotations. In the 4th year, they have a one week non-examinable posting in radiology. A survey was administered to preclinical (new curriculum) and clinical (old curriculum) students. Survey responses were tabulated and attitudes between preclinical and clinical students were compared. Results: More than half of the preclinical students (155 out of 270 students, 59{\%}) and 90 out of 720 clinical students (12.5{\%}) responded. Students exposed to the new curriculum had attended one or two dedicated radiology lectures and were considering radiology as a clinical elective. Both groups of students did not feel familiar with radiology as with other specialties, were not considering radiology as a career, but felt that radiology was interesting and important to the overall practice of medicine. Conclusions: Exposure of 1st year students to radiology increases their interest in the subject. Further intervention, fi ne-tuning of the curriculum and follow-up surveys will be carried out to see if this interest persists throughout their clinical years.",
keywords = "Curriculum, Medical schoo1, Undergraduate",
author = "Teo, {Lynette L S} and Venkatesh, {Sudhakar K} and Goh, {Poh Sun} and Chong, {Vincent F H}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "692--695",
journal = "Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore",
issn = "0304-4602",
publisher = "Academy of Medicine Singapore",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A survey of local preclinical and clinical medical students' attitudes towards radiology

AU - Teo, Lynette L S

AU - Venkatesh, Sudhakar K

AU - Goh, Poh Sun

AU - Chong, Vincent F H

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Introduction: This study compares the attitudes between preclinical and clinical medical students towards radiology, following the introduction of a new radiology curriculum for 1st year students. Materials and Methods: Revision of the 1st year medical school curriculum for the academic year of 2008/9 with the inclusion of 13 one-hour formal radiology lectures integrated with each body system was done in an undergraduate Southeast Asian medical school. In the old curriculum, 1st and 2nd year medical students are not exposed to radiology. They received limited radiology teaching in their 3rd and 5th years with 2 one-hour lectures as part of their medicine and surgery rotations. In the 4th year, they have a one week non-examinable posting in radiology. A survey was administered to preclinical (new curriculum) and clinical (old curriculum) students. Survey responses were tabulated and attitudes between preclinical and clinical students were compared. Results: More than half of the preclinical students (155 out of 270 students, 59%) and 90 out of 720 clinical students (12.5%) responded. Students exposed to the new curriculum had attended one or two dedicated radiology lectures and were considering radiology as a clinical elective. Both groups of students did not feel familiar with radiology as with other specialties, were not considering radiology as a career, but felt that radiology was interesting and important to the overall practice of medicine. Conclusions: Exposure of 1st year students to radiology increases their interest in the subject. Further intervention, fi ne-tuning of the curriculum and follow-up surveys will be carried out to see if this interest persists throughout their clinical years.

AB - Introduction: This study compares the attitudes between preclinical and clinical medical students towards radiology, following the introduction of a new radiology curriculum for 1st year students. Materials and Methods: Revision of the 1st year medical school curriculum for the academic year of 2008/9 with the inclusion of 13 one-hour formal radiology lectures integrated with each body system was done in an undergraduate Southeast Asian medical school. In the old curriculum, 1st and 2nd year medical students are not exposed to radiology. They received limited radiology teaching in their 3rd and 5th years with 2 one-hour lectures as part of their medicine and surgery rotations. In the 4th year, they have a one week non-examinable posting in radiology. A survey was administered to preclinical (new curriculum) and clinical (old curriculum) students. Survey responses were tabulated and attitudes between preclinical and clinical students were compared. Results: More than half of the preclinical students (155 out of 270 students, 59%) and 90 out of 720 clinical students (12.5%) responded. Students exposed to the new curriculum had attended one or two dedicated radiology lectures and were considering radiology as a clinical elective. Both groups of students did not feel familiar with radiology as with other specialties, were not considering radiology as a career, but felt that radiology was interesting and important to the overall practice of medicine. Conclusions: Exposure of 1st year students to radiology increases their interest in the subject. Further intervention, fi ne-tuning of the curriculum and follow-up surveys will be carried out to see if this interest persists throughout their clinical years.

KW - Curriculum

KW - Medical schoo1

KW - Undergraduate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149247998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149247998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 692

EP - 695

JO - Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore

JF - Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore

SN - 0304-4602

IS - 9

ER -