A survey of case reports and case series of therapeutic interventions in the Archives of Dermatology

Joerg Albrecht, Alexander Meves, Michael Bigby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Case reports and case series are often the first line of clinical evidence in the medical literature and, until stronger evidence becomes available, are the only guidance to new therapies. Aim: To determine how case reports and case series are reported, what kind of information is provided, and what the authors conclude. Methods: All case reports and series (n ≤ 10 patients) that described new or innovative therapies were selected from the online version of the Archives of Dermatology published from January 1998 to June 2001. Data were extracted according to a predefined protocol. Results: Sixty-two case reports and 38 case series were identified. Four of the 100 articles reported treatment failure; 25 reports (40%) and 19 series (50%) concluded that the treatment was efficacious or useful. Systemic treatment was used in 28 reports (45%) and 19 series (50%). Twelve series (32%) reported treatment of consecutive patients. Follow-up could not be assessed in seven case reports (11%). Sixteen reports (26%) and 15 series (39%) reported patients' experiences; 14 reports (23%) and 10 series (26%) indicated some consent. Conclusions: This small survey confirms a strong publication bias that favors positive results, exaggerated claims of efficacy and safety, underreporting of patient-centered outcomes, and inadequate reporting of consent. We hope to stimulate a discussion of the quality standards for reporting single cases and case series, and of how information from case reports can be used best to improve patient care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)592-597
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Dermatology
Volume48
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 16 2009

Fingerprint

Dermatology
Publication Bias
Investigational Therapies
Therapeutics
Patient Safety
Treatment Failure
Patient Care
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

A survey of case reports and case series of therapeutic interventions in the Archives of Dermatology. / Albrecht, Joerg; Meves, Alexander; Bigby, Michael.

In: International Journal of Dermatology, Vol. 48, No. 6, 16.06.2009, p. 592-597.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5de802dd302640d99011ab60753b88c2,
title = "A survey of case reports and case series of therapeutic interventions in the Archives of Dermatology",
abstract = "Background: Case reports and case series are often the first line of clinical evidence in the medical literature and, until stronger evidence becomes available, are the only guidance to new therapies. Aim: To determine how case reports and case series are reported, what kind of information is provided, and what the authors conclude. Methods: All case reports and series (n ≤ 10 patients) that described new or innovative therapies were selected from the online version of the Archives of Dermatology published from January 1998 to June 2001. Data were extracted according to a predefined protocol. Results: Sixty-two case reports and 38 case series were identified. Four of the 100 articles reported treatment failure; 25 reports (40{\%}) and 19 series (50{\%}) concluded that the treatment was efficacious or useful. Systemic treatment was used in 28 reports (45{\%}) and 19 series (50{\%}). Twelve series (32{\%}) reported treatment of consecutive patients. Follow-up could not be assessed in seven case reports (11{\%}). Sixteen reports (26{\%}) and 15 series (39{\%}) reported patients' experiences; 14 reports (23{\%}) and 10 series (26{\%}) indicated some consent. Conclusions: This small survey confirms a strong publication bias that favors positive results, exaggerated claims of efficacy and safety, underreporting of patient-centered outcomes, and inadequate reporting of consent. We hope to stimulate a discussion of the quality standards for reporting single cases and case series, and of how information from case reports can be used best to improve patient care.",
author = "Joerg Albrecht and Alexander Meves and Michael Bigby",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04031.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "592--597",
journal = "International Journal of Dermatology",
issn = "0011-9059",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A survey of case reports and case series of therapeutic interventions in the Archives of Dermatology

AU - Albrecht, Joerg

AU - Meves, Alexander

AU - Bigby, Michael

PY - 2009/6/16

Y1 - 2009/6/16

N2 - Background: Case reports and case series are often the first line of clinical evidence in the medical literature and, until stronger evidence becomes available, are the only guidance to new therapies. Aim: To determine how case reports and case series are reported, what kind of information is provided, and what the authors conclude. Methods: All case reports and series (n ≤ 10 patients) that described new or innovative therapies were selected from the online version of the Archives of Dermatology published from January 1998 to June 2001. Data were extracted according to a predefined protocol. Results: Sixty-two case reports and 38 case series were identified. Four of the 100 articles reported treatment failure; 25 reports (40%) and 19 series (50%) concluded that the treatment was efficacious or useful. Systemic treatment was used in 28 reports (45%) and 19 series (50%). Twelve series (32%) reported treatment of consecutive patients. Follow-up could not be assessed in seven case reports (11%). Sixteen reports (26%) and 15 series (39%) reported patients' experiences; 14 reports (23%) and 10 series (26%) indicated some consent. Conclusions: This small survey confirms a strong publication bias that favors positive results, exaggerated claims of efficacy and safety, underreporting of patient-centered outcomes, and inadequate reporting of consent. We hope to stimulate a discussion of the quality standards for reporting single cases and case series, and of how information from case reports can be used best to improve patient care.

AB - Background: Case reports and case series are often the first line of clinical evidence in the medical literature and, until stronger evidence becomes available, are the only guidance to new therapies. Aim: To determine how case reports and case series are reported, what kind of information is provided, and what the authors conclude. Methods: All case reports and series (n ≤ 10 patients) that described new or innovative therapies were selected from the online version of the Archives of Dermatology published from January 1998 to June 2001. Data were extracted according to a predefined protocol. Results: Sixty-two case reports and 38 case series were identified. Four of the 100 articles reported treatment failure; 25 reports (40%) and 19 series (50%) concluded that the treatment was efficacious or useful. Systemic treatment was used in 28 reports (45%) and 19 series (50%). Twelve series (32%) reported treatment of consecutive patients. Follow-up could not be assessed in seven case reports (11%). Sixteen reports (26%) and 15 series (39%) reported patients' experiences; 14 reports (23%) and 10 series (26%) indicated some consent. Conclusions: This small survey confirms a strong publication bias that favors positive results, exaggerated claims of efficacy and safety, underreporting of patient-centered outcomes, and inadequate reporting of consent. We hope to stimulate a discussion of the quality standards for reporting single cases and case series, and of how information from case reports can be used best to improve patient care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66849113827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66849113827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04031.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04031.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19538367

AN - SCOPUS:66849113827

VL - 48

SP - 592

EP - 597

JO - International Journal of Dermatology

JF - International Journal of Dermatology

SN - 0011-9059

IS - 6

ER -