A randomized pilot study of near activities versus non-near activities during patching therapy for amblyopia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To plan a future randomized clinical trial, we conducted a pilot study to determine whether children randomized to near or non-near activities would perform prescribed activities. A secondary aim was to obtain a preliminary estimate of the effect of near versus non-near activities on amblyopic eye visual acuity, when combined with 2 hours of daily patching. Methods: Sixty-four children, 3 to less than 7 years of age, with anisometropic, strabismic, or combined amblyopia (20/40 to 20/400) were randomly assigned to receive either 2 hours of daily patching with near activities or 2 hours of daily patching without near activities. Parents completed daily calendars for 4 weeks recording the activities performed while patched and received a weekly telephone call in which they were asked to describe the activities performed during the previous 2 hours of patching. Visual acuity was assessed at 4 weeks. Results: The children assigned to near visual activities performed more near activities than those assigned to non-near activities (by calendars, mean 1.6 ± 0.5 hours versus 0.2 ± 0.2 hours daily, P < 0.001; by telephone interviews, 1.6 ± 0.4 hours versus 0.4 ± 0.5 hours daily, P < 0.001). After 4 weeks of treatment, there was a suggestion of greater improvement in amblyopic eye visual acuity in those assigned to near visual activities (mean 2.6 lines versus 1.6 lines, P = 0.07). The treatment group difference in visual acuity was present for patients with severe amblyopia but not moderate amblyopia. Conclusions: Children patched and instructed to perform near activities for amblyopia spent more time performing those near activities than children who were instructed to perform non-near activities. Our results suggest that performing near activities while patched may be beneficial in treating amblyopia. Based on our data, a formal randomized amblyopia treatment trial of patching with and without near activities is both feasible and desirable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-136
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of AAPOS
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Amblyopia
Visual Acuity
Therapeutics
Telephone
Randomized Controlled Trials
Parents
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

A randomized pilot study of near activities versus non-near activities during patching therapy for amblyopia. / Holmes, Jonathan M.

In: Journal of AAPOS, Vol. 9, No. 2, 04.2005, p. 129-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d514d13371d4f608983a4c7f233e028,
title = "A randomized pilot study of near activities versus non-near activities during patching therapy for amblyopia",
abstract = "Background: To plan a future randomized clinical trial, we conducted a pilot study to determine whether children randomized to near or non-near activities would perform prescribed activities. A secondary aim was to obtain a preliminary estimate of the effect of near versus non-near activities on amblyopic eye visual acuity, when combined with 2 hours of daily patching. Methods: Sixty-four children, 3 to less than 7 years of age, with anisometropic, strabismic, or combined amblyopia (20/40 to 20/400) were randomly assigned to receive either 2 hours of daily patching with near activities or 2 hours of daily patching without near activities. Parents completed daily calendars for 4 weeks recording the activities performed while patched and received a weekly telephone call in which they were asked to describe the activities performed during the previous 2 hours of patching. Visual acuity was assessed at 4 weeks. Results: The children assigned to near visual activities performed more near activities than those assigned to non-near activities (by calendars, mean 1.6 ± 0.5 hours versus 0.2 ± 0.2 hours daily, P < 0.001; by telephone interviews, 1.6 ± 0.4 hours versus 0.4 ± 0.5 hours daily, P < 0.001). After 4 weeks of treatment, there was a suggestion of greater improvement in amblyopic eye visual acuity in those assigned to near visual activities (mean 2.6 lines versus 1.6 lines, P = 0.07). The treatment group difference in visual acuity was present for patients with severe amblyopia but not moderate amblyopia. Conclusions: Children patched and instructed to perform near activities for amblyopia spent more time performing those near activities than children who were instructed to perform non-near activities. Our results suggest that performing near activities while patched may be beneficial in treating amblyopia. Based on our data, a formal randomized amblyopia treatment trial of patching with and without near activities is both feasible and desirable.",
author = "Holmes, {Jonathan M}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.12.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "129--136",
journal = "Journal of AAPOS",
issn = "1091-8531",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized pilot study of near activities versus non-near activities during patching therapy for amblyopia

AU - Holmes, Jonathan M

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - Background: To plan a future randomized clinical trial, we conducted a pilot study to determine whether children randomized to near or non-near activities would perform prescribed activities. A secondary aim was to obtain a preliminary estimate of the effect of near versus non-near activities on amblyopic eye visual acuity, when combined with 2 hours of daily patching. Methods: Sixty-four children, 3 to less than 7 years of age, with anisometropic, strabismic, or combined amblyopia (20/40 to 20/400) were randomly assigned to receive either 2 hours of daily patching with near activities or 2 hours of daily patching without near activities. Parents completed daily calendars for 4 weeks recording the activities performed while patched and received a weekly telephone call in which they were asked to describe the activities performed during the previous 2 hours of patching. Visual acuity was assessed at 4 weeks. Results: The children assigned to near visual activities performed more near activities than those assigned to non-near activities (by calendars, mean 1.6 ± 0.5 hours versus 0.2 ± 0.2 hours daily, P < 0.001; by telephone interviews, 1.6 ± 0.4 hours versus 0.4 ± 0.5 hours daily, P < 0.001). After 4 weeks of treatment, there was a suggestion of greater improvement in amblyopic eye visual acuity in those assigned to near visual activities (mean 2.6 lines versus 1.6 lines, P = 0.07). The treatment group difference in visual acuity was present for patients with severe amblyopia but not moderate amblyopia. Conclusions: Children patched and instructed to perform near activities for amblyopia spent more time performing those near activities than children who were instructed to perform non-near activities. Our results suggest that performing near activities while patched may be beneficial in treating amblyopia. Based on our data, a formal randomized amblyopia treatment trial of patching with and without near activities is both feasible and desirable.

AB - Background: To plan a future randomized clinical trial, we conducted a pilot study to determine whether children randomized to near or non-near activities would perform prescribed activities. A secondary aim was to obtain a preliminary estimate of the effect of near versus non-near activities on amblyopic eye visual acuity, when combined with 2 hours of daily patching. Methods: Sixty-four children, 3 to less than 7 years of age, with anisometropic, strabismic, or combined amblyopia (20/40 to 20/400) were randomly assigned to receive either 2 hours of daily patching with near activities or 2 hours of daily patching without near activities. Parents completed daily calendars for 4 weeks recording the activities performed while patched and received a weekly telephone call in which they were asked to describe the activities performed during the previous 2 hours of patching. Visual acuity was assessed at 4 weeks. Results: The children assigned to near visual activities performed more near activities than those assigned to non-near activities (by calendars, mean 1.6 ± 0.5 hours versus 0.2 ± 0.2 hours daily, P < 0.001; by telephone interviews, 1.6 ± 0.4 hours versus 0.4 ± 0.5 hours daily, P < 0.001). After 4 weeks of treatment, there was a suggestion of greater improvement in amblyopic eye visual acuity in those assigned to near visual activities (mean 2.6 lines versus 1.6 lines, P = 0.07). The treatment group difference in visual acuity was present for patients with severe amblyopia but not moderate amblyopia. Conclusions: Children patched and instructed to perform near activities for amblyopia spent more time performing those near activities than children who were instructed to perform non-near activities. Our results suggest that performing near activities while patched may be beneficial in treating amblyopia. Based on our data, a formal randomized amblyopia treatment trial of patching with and without near activities is both feasible and desirable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17444367711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17444367711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.12.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.12.014

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 129

EP - 136

JO - Journal of AAPOS

JF - Journal of AAPOS

SN - 1091-8531

IS - 2

ER -