A randomized comparison of defibrillation thresholds in the right ventricular outflow tract versus right ventricular apex

Michael Mollerus, Margaret Lipinski, Thomas Munger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) has the same defibrillation threshold (DFT) as the right ventricular apex (RVA). Background: Right ventricular ICD leads have usually been placed in the RVA. Development of active fixation technology has allowed the placement of these leads in alternate locations such as the RVOT. Methods: At time of device implantation, 26 patients with either ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy underwent DFT testing in both the RVA and RVOT using a binary search algorithm. Results: Placement of the lead in the RVA had a mean DFT of 7.6±2.8 J while the placement of the lead in the RVOT had a mean DFT of 10.3±3.0 J. The median (25th and 75th percentiles) DFTs in the RVA and RVOT were 7.5 J (6 and 11 J) and 11 J (9 and 14 J), respectively (p=0.0002). Conclusions: Placement of the right ventricular lead in the RVA has a significantly lower DFT than placement of the lead in the RVOT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-225
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Technology
Equipment and Supplies
Lead

Keywords

  • Defibrillation threshold testing
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Right ventricular outflow tract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

A randomized comparison of defibrillation thresholds in the right ventricular outflow tract versus right ventricular apex. / Mollerus, Michael; Lipinski, Margaret; Munger, Thomas.

In: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, Vol. 22, No. 3, 09.2008, p. 221-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d5b207f517a3423b9b6a0b7f19673ef1,
title = "A randomized comparison of defibrillation thresholds in the right ventricular outflow tract versus right ventricular apex",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether the placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) has the same defibrillation threshold (DFT) as the right ventricular apex (RVA). Background: Right ventricular ICD leads have usually been placed in the RVA. Development of active fixation technology has allowed the placement of these leads in alternate locations such as the RVOT. Methods: At time of device implantation, 26 patients with either ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy underwent DFT testing in both the RVA and RVOT using a binary search algorithm. Results: Placement of the lead in the RVA had a mean DFT of 7.6±2.8 J while the placement of the lead in the RVOT had a mean DFT of 10.3±3.0 J. The median (25th and 75th percentiles) DFTs in the RVA and RVOT were 7.5 J (6 and 11 J) and 11 J (9 and 14 J), respectively (p=0.0002). Conclusions: Placement of the right ventricular lead in the RVA has a significantly lower DFT than placement of the lead in the RVOT.",
keywords = "Defibrillation threshold testing, Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, Right ventricular outflow tract",
author = "Michael Mollerus and Margaret Lipinski and Thomas Munger",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s10840-008-9254-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "221--225",
journal = "Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology",
issn = "1383-875X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized comparison of defibrillation thresholds in the right ventricular outflow tract versus right ventricular apex

AU - Mollerus, Michael

AU - Lipinski, Margaret

AU - Munger, Thomas

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - Objective: To determine whether the placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) has the same defibrillation threshold (DFT) as the right ventricular apex (RVA). Background: Right ventricular ICD leads have usually been placed in the RVA. Development of active fixation technology has allowed the placement of these leads in alternate locations such as the RVOT. Methods: At time of device implantation, 26 patients with either ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy underwent DFT testing in both the RVA and RVOT using a binary search algorithm. Results: Placement of the lead in the RVA had a mean DFT of 7.6±2.8 J while the placement of the lead in the RVOT had a mean DFT of 10.3±3.0 J. The median (25th and 75th percentiles) DFTs in the RVA and RVOT were 7.5 J (6 and 11 J) and 11 J (9 and 14 J), respectively (p=0.0002). Conclusions: Placement of the right ventricular lead in the RVA has a significantly lower DFT than placement of the lead in the RVOT.

AB - Objective: To determine whether the placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) has the same defibrillation threshold (DFT) as the right ventricular apex (RVA). Background: Right ventricular ICD leads have usually been placed in the RVA. Development of active fixation technology has allowed the placement of these leads in alternate locations such as the RVOT. Methods: At time of device implantation, 26 patients with either ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy underwent DFT testing in both the RVA and RVOT using a binary search algorithm. Results: Placement of the lead in the RVA had a mean DFT of 7.6±2.8 J while the placement of the lead in the RVOT had a mean DFT of 10.3±3.0 J. The median (25th and 75th percentiles) DFTs in the RVA and RVOT were 7.5 J (6 and 11 J) and 11 J (9 and 14 J), respectively (p=0.0002). Conclusions: Placement of the right ventricular lead in the RVA has a significantly lower DFT than placement of the lead in the RVOT.

KW - Defibrillation threshold testing

KW - Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

KW - Right ventricular outflow tract

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48349099869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48349099869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10840-008-9254-x

DO - 10.1007/s10840-008-9254-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18470602

AN - SCOPUS:48349099869

VL - 22

SP - 221

EP - 225

JO - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

JF - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

SN - 1383-875X

IS - 3

ER -