A quick, reliable, and automated method for fat cell sizing

Yourka D. Tchoukalova, Deborah A. Harteneck, R. A. Karwoski, J. Tarara, Michael Dennis Jensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mean diameters of fat cells from abdominal tissues from 31 volunteers were determined by three methods based on fat cell isolation after collagenase digestion and methylene blue staining. The three methods were direct microscopy (Micro), manual measurement of diameters from digital images by using the public domain NIH Image program (Scion), and automated measurement of diameters from digital images using a customized program developed by Biomedical Imaging Resource at Mayo Clinic (AdCount). There was excellent agreement between the methods' measurement of mean abdominal fat cell diameter (concordance correlation coefficient >0.84). The Scion method gave slightly but systematically lower mean abdominal fat cell diameters than did either AdCount or Micro. The AdCount approach produced results that are comparable to those from Micro. Comparison of AdCount and Micro in measuring diameters of fat cells from thigh confirmed the good comparability between the two methods independent of fat depot. AdCount is very reliable, and the quickest and most objective of the three methods in measuring fat cell diameters from various depots. - Tchoukalova, Y. D., D. A. Harteneck, R. A. Karworski, J. Tatara, and M. D. Jensen. A quick, reliable and automated method for fat cell sizing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1795-1801
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Lipid Research
Volume44
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2003

Fingerprint

Adipocytes
Fats
Microscopy
Microscopic examination
Abdominal Fat
Cell Separation
Public Sector
Methylene Blue
Collagenases
Thigh
Digestion
Volunteers
Staining and Labeling
Tissue
Imaging techniques

Keywords

  • Adipocyte
  • Collagenase
  • Fat cell diameter
  • Fat tissue cellularity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology

Cite this

Tchoukalova, Y. D., Harteneck, D. A., Karwoski, R. A., Tarara, J., & Jensen, M. D. (2003). A quick, reliable, and automated method for fat cell sizing. Journal of Lipid Research, 44(9), 1795-1801. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.D300001-JLR200

A quick, reliable, and automated method for fat cell sizing. / Tchoukalova, Yourka D.; Harteneck, Deborah A.; Karwoski, R. A.; Tarara, J.; Jensen, Michael Dennis.

In: Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 44, No. 9, 01.09.2003, p. 1795-1801.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tchoukalova, YD, Harteneck, DA, Karwoski, RA, Tarara, J & Jensen, MD 2003, 'A quick, reliable, and automated method for fat cell sizing', Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1795-1801. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.D300001-JLR200
Tchoukalova, Yourka D. ; Harteneck, Deborah A. ; Karwoski, R. A. ; Tarara, J. ; Jensen, Michael Dennis. / A quick, reliable, and automated method for fat cell sizing. In: Journal of Lipid Research. 2003 ; Vol. 44, No. 9. pp. 1795-1801.
@article{3bf96af490b64c6fafa587b3f1044f2d,
title = "A quick, reliable, and automated method for fat cell sizing",
abstract = "Mean diameters of fat cells from abdominal tissues from 31 volunteers were determined by three methods based on fat cell isolation after collagenase digestion and methylene blue staining. The three methods were direct microscopy (Micro), manual measurement of diameters from digital images by using the public domain NIH Image program (Scion), and automated measurement of diameters from digital images using a customized program developed by Biomedical Imaging Resource at Mayo Clinic (AdCount). There was excellent agreement between the methods' measurement of mean abdominal fat cell diameter (concordance correlation coefficient >0.84). The Scion method gave slightly but systematically lower mean abdominal fat cell diameters than did either AdCount or Micro. The AdCount approach produced results that are comparable to those from Micro. Comparison of AdCount and Micro in measuring diameters of fat cells from thigh confirmed the good comparability between the two methods independent of fat depot. AdCount is very reliable, and the quickest and most objective of the three methods in measuring fat cell diameters from various depots. - Tchoukalova, Y. D., D. A. Harteneck, R. A. Karworski, J. Tatara, and M. D. Jensen. A quick, reliable and automated method for fat cell sizing.",
keywords = "Adipocyte, Collagenase, Fat cell diameter, Fat tissue cellularity",
author = "Tchoukalova, {Yourka D.} and Harteneck, {Deborah A.} and Karwoski, {R. A.} and J. Tarara and Jensen, {Michael Dennis}",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1194/jlr.D300001-JLR200",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "1795--1801",
journal = "Journal of Lipid Research",
issn = "0022-2275",
publisher = "American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A quick, reliable, and automated method for fat cell sizing

AU - Tchoukalova, Yourka D.

AU - Harteneck, Deborah A.

AU - Karwoski, R. A.

AU - Tarara, J.

AU - Jensen, Michael Dennis

PY - 2003/9/1

Y1 - 2003/9/1

N2 - Mean diameters of fat cells from abdominal tissues from 31 volunteers were determined by three methods based on fat cell isolation after collagenase digestion and methylene blue staining. The three methods were direct microscopy (Micro), manual measurement of diameters from digital images by using the public domain NIH Image program (Scion), and automated measurement of diameters from digital images using a customized program developed by Biomedical Imaging Resource at Mayo Clinic (AdCount). There was excellent agreement between the methods' measurement of mean abdominal fat cell diameter (concordance correlation coefficient >0.84). The Scion method gave slightly but systematically lower mean abdominal fat cell diameters than did either AdCount or Micro. The AdCount approach produced results that are comparable to those from Micro. Comparison of AdCount and Micro in measuring diameters of fat cells from thigh confirmed the good comparability between the two methods independent of fat depot. AdCount is very reliable, and the quickest and most objective of the three methods in measuring fat cell diameters from various depots. - Tchoukalova, Y. D., D. A. Harteneck, R. A. Karworski, J. Tatara, and M. D. Jensen. A quick, reliable and automated method for fat cell sizing.

AB - Mean diameters of fat cells from abdominal tissues from 31 volunteers were determined by three methods based on fat cell isolation after collagenase digestion and methylene blue staining. The three methods were direct microscopy (Micro), manual measurement of diameters from digital images by using the public domain NIH Image program (Scion), and automated measurement of diameters from digital images using a customized program developed by Biomedical Imaging Resource at Mayo Clinic (AdCount). There was excellent agreement between the methods' measurement of mean abdominal fat cell diameter (concordance correlation coefficient >0.84). The Scion method gave slightly but systematically lower mean abdominal fat cell diameters than did either AdCount or Micro. The AdCount approach produced results that are comparable to those from Micro. Comparison of AdCount and Micro in measuring diameters of fat cells from thigh confirmed the good comparability between the two methods independent of fat depot. AdCount is very reliable, and the quickest and most objective of the three methods in measuring fat cell diameters from various depots. - Tchoukalova, Y. D., D. A. Harteneck, R. A. Karworski, J. Tatara, and M. D. Jensen. A quick, reliable and automated method for fat cell sizing.

KW - Adipocyte

KW - Collagenase

KW - Fat cell diameter

KW - Fat tissue cellularity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141571016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141571016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1194/jlr.D300001-JLR200

DO - 10.1194/jlr.D300001-JLR200

M3 - Article

C2 - 12777477

AN - SCOPUS:0141571016

VL - 44

SP - 1795

EP - 1801

JO - Journal of Lipid Research

JF - Journal of Lipid Research

SN - 0022-2275

IS - 9

ER -